Daniel 8 is the eighth
chapter of the
Book of Daniel. It tells of
Daniel's vision of a two-horned ram destroyed by a one-horned goat, followed by the history of the "little horn", which is Daniel's code-word for the
Greek king
Antiochus IV Epiphanes.[1]
Although set during the reign or regency of
King Belshazzar (who probably died in 539 BCE), the subject of the vision is Antiochus' oppression of the Jewish people during the second century BCE: he outlawed Jewish customs such as circumcision, the Jewish festival calendar, dietary restrictions, and
Sabbath observance,[Notes 1] made ownership of the
Torah scroll a capital offense, and built an altar to Zeus in the Temple (the "
abomination of desolation").[2] His program sparked a popular uprising which led to the retaking of Jerusalem and the Temple by
Judas Maccabeus (164 BCE).[3]
Summary
In the third year of
Belshazzar, king of Babylon, Daniel in a vision sees himself in
Susa, which is in
Elam, in modern-day western
Iran. In his vision he sees a
ram with two horns, one greater than the other; the ram charges to the west, north and south, and no other beast can stand against it. Daniel then sees a male
goat with a single horn come from the west without touching the ground; it strikes the ram and destroys it. At the height of his power the goat's horn is broken and in its place four horns grow.[4] One of the horns is small but grows great and prospers in everything it does, throwing stars down to the earth, stopping the daily sacrifice, destroying the sanctuary and throwing truth to the ground.[5] Daniel is told the vision will be fulfilled in 2,300 evenings and mornings, when the sanctuary will be cleansed.[6] The angel
Gabriel appears and tells Daniel that this is a vision about the
time of the end.[7]
The
Book of Daniel originated as a collection of
folktales among the Jewish community in Babylon and Mesopotamia in the Persian and early
Hellenistic periods (5th to 3rd centuries BCE), and was later expanded by the visions of chapters 7–12 in the
Maccabean era (mid-2nd century).[8] Daniel is a legendary figure[9] and his name was presumably chosen for the hero of the book because of his reputation as a wise seer in Hebrew tradition.[10] The structure of the chapter can be described as follows:[11]
I. Introduction: date and place (verses 1–2);
II. Vision report: ram, he-goat, angelic conversation (3–12);
III. Epiphany (appearance) of interpreter: circumstances and desire for interpretation, epiphany (15–17);
IV. Interpretation: circumstances, interpretation of images, concluding statement by the angel (18–26);
V. Concluding statement of visionary's reaction, v.27.
Genre and themes
The Book of Daniel is an
apocalypse, a literary genre in which a heavenly reality is revealed to a human recipient; such works are characterized by visions, symbolism, an other-worldly mediator, an emphasis on cosmic events, angels and demons, and pseudonymity (false authorship).[12] Apocalypses were common from 300 BCE to 100 CE, not only among Jews and Christians, but Greeks,
Romans, Persians and
Egyptians.[13] Daniel, the book's hero, is a representative apocalyptic seer, the recipient of the divine revelation: has learned the wisdom of the Babylonian magicians and surpassed them, because his God is the true source of knowledge; he is one of the maskil, the wise, whose task is to teach righteousness.[13] The book is also an
eschatology, meaning a divine revelation concerning the end of the present age, a moment in which God will intervene in history to usher in the final kingdom.[14]
Daniel 8 conforms to the type of the "symbolic dream vision" and the "regnal" or "dynastic" prophecy, analogous to a work called the "Babylonian Dynastic Prophecy"–a more extensive example appears in Daniel 11. For its sources it draws on Daniel 7, which supplies the symbolism of the "little horn" and the "holy ones" (angels), as well as on the
Book of Ezekiel, which provides the location by a river and the epiphany of the angel, and on the
Book of Habakkuk with its concern with the "end of time." The "little horn" which casts some of the stars to the ground recalls
Isaiah 14:12 and
Lucifer, which in turn presupposes the
Ugaritic (Canaanite) myth of Attar's attempt to take the throne of
Baal.[15]
Chapter 8 is about the actions of the world-powers at the "end-time".[16] The course of history is pre-determined, and Antiochus is merely playing a role in the unwinding of God's plan.[17] Daniel 8 is thus a reinterpretation and expansion of Daniel 7:[18] where chapter 7 spoke only cryptically of the change-over from the Medo-Persian empire to the age of the Greek kings, chapter 8 makes this explicit; by the same token, chapter 8 speaks cryptically of the "little horn," whose story will be taken up in detail in the following chapters.[16]
Interpretation
Historical background
Daniel 8 is an interpretation of the author's own time, 167–164 BCE, with a claim that God will bring to an end the oppression of the Jewish people.[19] It begins with the Greek conquest of the
Persian empire, touches on the rise of the four Greek successor-kingdoms, and then focuses on the career of
Antiochus IV Epiphanes, who took the throne of
Seleucid Syria in 175 BCE.[20] Antiochus found himself in conflict with the Jews, and while the details are obscure, it appears that there was a revolt in
Jerusalem, he sent troops to suppress it, and as a result the daily Jewish sacrifice was stopped and the
Temple polluted.[21] The date for this is usually given as 167 BCE.[21] The attempt to wipe out traditional religion and culture inevitably provoked a reaction, and the rebel Jews, led by
Judas Maccabee and his brothers, won sufficient military victories over the Seleucids to take back and purify the temple three years later.[21]
The ram, the he-goat, the great horn and the four new horns
The symbols of the ram and he-goat, explained in the text of Daniel 8 as representing the kings of
Persia and
Greece, are apparently drawn from the
constellations that preside over
Persia and
Syria in
Hellenistic astrology.[22] Scholars are agreed that the goat's first horn (the horn which is broken) is
Alexander the Great, and the four horns which then arise are the four generals who divided his empire.[23] The detail that the goat does not touch the ground as he attacks the ram may reflect the speed of Alexander's conquest.[24]
The "little horn" and his war on God
The "little horn" which arises from the four horns is
Antiochus Epiphanes.[22] It "grows in power to the south and to the east and towards the beautiful land", reflecting Antiochus' campaigns in Egypt (169–168 BCE), Persia (166 BCE) and Israel (the "beautiful land").[25] "Truth was flung to the ground" by the little horn as it tramples the land: this is probably a reference to the
Torah, the Law of Moses.[26]
Daniel 8:13's "holy ones" most likely means
angels, rather than saints, as in the King James Version.[27] Sometimes in the Hebrew Bible it seems to refer to the Israelites.[28] Stars were commonly identified with angels in ancient Israel, and in 8:10 the reader is told that the little horn "grew great ... and some of the host of the stars it cast down to the ground and trampled upon them", indicating that Antiochus fights against the "heavenly host" of God's angels.[29] Indeed, he "aspired to be as great as the Prince of the host," God himself.[25]
Daniel is the only book in the Hebrew Bible which gives names to angels.
Gabriel may have received his because he "has the appearance of a man" (Hebrew gaber); he appears here as a messenger and interpreter of God's message, the same role he was later given by the author of
Luke's
annunciation scene (
Luke 1:19,
26).[30] Michael is depicted as Israel's
guardian angel and a warrior.[30] The prominence given these divine beings in Daniel is typical of Hellenistic Jewish literature, but much more restricted than in contemporary works such as
First Enoch.[30]
The 2,300 evenings and mornings
In verse 13 Daniel overhears two "holy ones" (angels). One asks" "For how long is this vision concerning the regular burnt offering, the transgression that makes desolate, and the giving over the sanctuary and host to be trampled?" and Daniel is informed that it will be "for 2,300 evenings and mornings," or 1,150 days.[31] This is contradicted (twice in one sentence) at the end of Daniel 12, which says that "from the time the regular burnt offering is taken away ... there shall be 1,290 days; happy are those that persevere and attain the 1,335 days" (
Daniel 12:11–12): the different numbers, first 1,150 days, then 1,290, finally 1,335, are presumably revisions made when the earlier numbers passed without fulfillment.[32]
The period in question was initially the duration of the desecration of the Temple, but 1,150 days is slightly less than three and a half years, while the desecration lasted only three years.[31] It seems likely that the focus of the author shifted from the desecration and re-dedication of the Temple to the end of history, which would be marked by the resurrection of the dead: the final number in
Daniel 12:12 is followed by the instruction to Daniel to "go your way and rest; you shall rise for your reward at the end of days."[32]
The interpretation of the 2,300 evenings and mornings as equivalent to half that number of days–1150 days–appears to be the most common, but
C. L. Seow, a leading Daniel scholar, takes it to mean 2,300 full days. This would be equivalent to about seven years; assuming that the end-point is the re-dedication of the Temple and restoration of sacrifices in 164 BCE, the starting point would then be the murder of the high priest
Onias III in 171, another notable year in the events leading up to the desecration.[33]
Christian eschatological readings
The Book of Daniel, and along with
Revelation, formed one of the foundations of
Christianeschatology.[34][Notes 2] The authors of the
Gospels identified
Jesus with
Daniel 7's "one like a
son of man", and by the 3rd century CE the stone of
Daniel 2 and the fourth figure in the furnace in Daniel 3 were interpreted as
Christ, the fourth kingdom of Daniel 7 was
Rome, and the "little horn" was the
Antichrist (his identification as Antiochus was denied by
Jerome in a famous exchange with the pagan philosopher
Porphyry).[35] Daniel's timetable was reinterpreted to fit Christian expectations: the prophecy of 70 weeks in
Daniel 9:20–27, for example, was commonly held to end either with the life and death of Christ or with the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 CE.[36]
In the
Middle Ages dissident
Catholics, and later
Martin Luther, identified the
pope as the Antichrist, while the "little horn" included
Mohammed, Antiochus, and the papacy, depending on which chapter of Daniel involved.[36] In the 17th century the English
Puritans interpreted their struggle in terms of God's army (themselves) battling the
Antichrist (the pope) and his ally (the king), and the
Fifth Monarchy Men took their name and ideal of government from Daniel 7.[37]
Carroll, John T. (2000).
"Eschatology". In Freedman, David Noel; Myers, Allen C. (eds.). Eerdmans Dictionary of the Bible. Eerdmans.
ISBN978-90-5356-503-2.
Collins, John J. (2013).
"Daniel". In Lieb, Michael; Mason, Emma; Roberts, Jonathan (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of the Reception History of the Bible. Oxford UNiversity Press.
ISBN978-0-19-164918-9.
Crawford, Sidnie White (2000).
"Apocalyptic". In Freedman, David Noel; Myers, Allen C. (eds.). Eerdmans Dictionary of the Bible. Eerdmans.
ISBN978-90-5356-503-2.
Grabbe, Lester L. (2002b).
"A Dan(iel) For All Seasons". In Collins, John J.; Flint, Peter W.; VanEpps, Cameron (eds.). The Book of Daniel: Composition and Reception. BRILL.
ISBN90-04-11675-3.
Hill, Andrew E. (2009).
"Daniel". In Garland, David E.; Longman, Tremper (eds.). Daniel—Malachi. Zondervan.
ISBN978-0-310-59054-5.
Hill, Charles E. (2000).
"Antichrist". In Freedman, David Noel; Myers, Allen C. (eds.). Eerdmans Dictionary of the Bible. Eerdmans.
ISBN978-90-5356-503-2.
Kratz, Reinhard (2001).
"The Visions of Daniel". In Collins, John J.; Flint, Peter W.; VanEpps, Cameron (eds.). The Book of Daniel: Composition and Reception. BRILL.
ISBN90-04-11675-3.
Levine, Amy-Jill (2010).
"Daniel". In Coogan, Michael D.; Brettler, Marc Z.; Newsom, Carol A. (eds.). The new Oxford annotated Bible with the Apocryphal/Deuterocanonical books: New Revised Standard Version.
Oxford University Press.
ISBN978-0-19-937050-4.
Rowland, Christopher (2007).
"Apocalyptic Literature". In Hass, Andrew; Jasper, David; Jay, Elisabeth (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of English Literature and Theology. Oxford University Press.
ISBN978-0-19-927197-9.
Spencer, Richard A. (2002).
"Additions to Daniel". In Mills, Watson E.; Wilson, Richard F. (eds.). The Deuterocanonicals/Apocrypha. Mercer University Press.
ISBN978-0-86554-510-6.
Casey, Maurice (1980). Son of Man: The interpretation and influence of Daniel 7. Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge. p. 272.
ISBN0-281-03697-7. lists ten commentators of the 'Syrian Tradition' who identify the fourth beast of chapter 7 as Greece, the little horn as Antiochus, and – in the majority of instances – the "saints of the Most High" as Maccabean Jews.
Dougherty, Raymond Philip (1929). Nabonidus and Belshazzar: A Study of the Closing Events of the Neo- Babylonian Empire. Yale University Press. p. 216.
ASINB000M9MGX8.
Kenneth Sylvan Guthrie (1987). David R. Fideler (ed.). The Pythagorean sourcebook and library: an anthology of ancient writings which relate to Pythagoras and Pythagorean philosophy. Translated by Guthrie; Thomas Taylor; Arthur Fairbanks Jr. (New ed.). Grand Rapids:
Phanes Press.
ISBN978-0-933999-51-0.
Louis F. Hartman and Alexander A. Di Lella, "Daniel", in
Raymond E. Brown et al., ed., The New Jerome Biblical Commentary, 1990, pp. 406–20.
Hoppe, Leslie J. (1992).
"Deuteronomy"(Google On-line Books). In Bergant, Dianne (ed.). The Collegeville Bible commentary: based on the New American Bible: Old Testament. Liturgical Press. p. 464.
ISBN0-8146-2211-9. Retrieved 2010-06-24.
Keil, C. F.; Delitzsch, Franz (2006) [1955]. Ezekiel and Daniel. Commentary on the Old Testament. Vol. 9. Hendrickson Publishers.
ISBN0-913573-88-4.
Longman III, Tremper; Dillard, Raymond B. (2006) [1995]. An Introduction to the Old Testament (2nd ed.). Zonderman. p. 528.
Lucas, Ernest (2002). Daniel. Leicester, England: Apollos.
ISBN0-85111-780-5.
Notes (1992). The New American Bible. Catholic Book Publishing Co. p. 1021.
ISBN978-0-89942-510-8.
Oppenheim, A. Leo (1966). "Babylonian and Assyrian Historical Texts". In James B. Pritchard (ed.). Ancient Near Eastern Texts (2nd ed.; 3rd print ed.). Princeton University Press. p. 308.
Rowley, H. H. (1959). Darius the Mede and the Four World Empires in the Book of Daniel: A Historical Study of Contemporary Theories. University of Wales Press. p. 195.
ISBN1-59752-896-X.
Rowley, Harold Henry (1963). The Growth of the Old Testament. Harper & Row.
Shea, William H. (1986). "The Prophecy of Daniel 9:24–27". In Holbrook, Frank (ed.). The Seventy Weeks, Leviticus, and the Nature of Prophecy. Daniel and Revelation Committee Series. Vol. 3. Review and Herald Publishing Association.
Manser, Martin H. (2009). David Barratt; Pieter J. Lalleman; Julius Steinberg (eds.). Critical companion to the Bible: a literary reference. New York:
Facts On File.
ISBN978-0-8160-7065-7.
Holbrook, Frank B., ed. (1986). Symposium on Daniel. Daniel & Revelation Committee Series. Vol. 2. Biblical Research Institute: Review and Herald Publishing Association. p. 557.
ISBN0-925675-01-6.