The Christensen failure criterion is a material failure theory for isotropic materials that attempts to span the range from ductile to brittle materials. [1] It has a two-property form calibrated by the uniaxial tensile and compressive strengths T and C .
The theory was developed by Stanford professor Richard. M. Christensen and first published in 1997. [2] [3]
The Christensen failure criterion is composed of two separate subcriteria representing competitive failure mechanisms. when expressed in principal stress components, it is given by :
For
|
(1)
|
For
|
(2)
|
The geometric form of ( 1) is that of a paraboloid in principal stress space. The fracture criterion ( 2) (applicable only over the partial range 0 ≤ T/C ≤ 1/2 ) cuts slices off the paraboloid, leaving three flattened elliptical surfaces on it. The fracture cutoff is vanishingly small at T/C=1/2 but it grows progressively larger as T/C diminishes.
The organizing principle underlying the theory is that all isotropic materials admit a distinct classification system based upon their T/C ratio. The comprehensive failure criterion ( 1) and ( 2) reduces to the Mises criterion at the ductile limit, T/C = 1. At the brittle limit, T/C = 0, it reduces to a form that cannot sustain any tensile components of stress.
Many cases of verification have been examined over the complete range of materials from extremely ductile to extremely brittle types. [1] Also, examples of applications have been given. Related criteria distinguishing ductile from brittle failure behaviors have been derived and interpreted.
Applications have been given by Ha [4] to the failure of the isotropic, polymeric matrix phase in fiber composite materials.