 |
| Bumper v. North Carolina | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued April 24–25, 1968 Decided June 3, 1968 | |
| Full case name | Bumper v. North Carolina |
| Citations | 391
U.S.
543 (
more) 88 S. Ct. 1788; 20
L. Ed. 2d 797 |
| Case history | |
| Prior | State v. Bumpers, 270 N.C. 521, 155 S.E.2d 173 (1967); cert. granted, 389 U.S. 1034 (1968). |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Stewart, joined by Warren, Brennan, Fortas, Marshall (in full); Douglas, Harlan (Part II) |
| Concurrence | Douglas |
| Concurrence | Harlan |
| Dissent | Black |
| Dissent | White |
| Laws applied | |
| U.S. Const. amend. IV | |
Bumper v. North Carolina, 391 U.S. 543 (1968), was a U.S. Supreme Court case in which a search was struck down as illegal because the police falsely claimed they had a search warrant. [1] This was tantamount to telling the subject that she had no choice but to consent. [2] Justice Potter Stewart delivered the decision for the 7-2 majority. [3]
References
- ^ Bumper v. North Carolina, 391 U.S. 543 (1968).
- ^ https://olemiss.edu/depts/ncjrl/pdf/Law%20Enforcement%20Materials/Other%20Search%20and%20Seizure%20Issues%20Likely%20to%20Arise%20in%20Digital%20Child%20Porn%20Cases%20-%20Consent%20Searches.pdf [ bare URL PDF]
- ^ https://www.oyez.org/cases/1967/1016 [ bare URL]
External links
-
Works related to
Bumper v. North Carolina at Wikisource - Text of Bumper v. North Carolina, 391 U.S. 543 (1968) is available from: Google Scholar Justia Library of Congress Oyez (oral argument audio)
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |