In 1923, during the
American Museum of Natural History expedition by
Roy Chapman Andrews to
Inner Mongolia, Peter Kaisen discovered numerous theropod remains in three quarries. They consist of the largely disarticulated remains of several individuals and material of the skull and the lower jaws is lacking. These were named and shortly described by
Charles Whitney Gilmore in 1933 as a new species of Ornithomimus: Ornithomimus asiaticus. The
specific name refers to the Asian provenance.[1] The species was placed in the new genus Archaeornithomimus by
Dale Russell in 1972, making Archaeornithomimus asiaticus the
type species of the genus. The generic name combines that of Ornithomimus with a Greek ἀρχαῖος (archaios), "ancient", because Russell believed that the layers in which Archaeornithomimus was found dated to the
Cenomanian-
Turonian ages, about 95 million years ago, making it one of the oldest ornithomimids known at the time.[2] Gilmore had not assigned a
holotype specimen; in 1990 David Smith and
Peter Galton in the first comprehensive description of the fossils, choose specimen AMNH 6565, a foot, as the
lectotype.[3] The fossils were found in the
Iren Dabasu Formation, which has been dated to the Cenomanian age, around 95.8 ± 6.2
million years ago.[4]
Foot bones found in the
Early CretaceousArundel Formation of
Maryland were referred by
Othniel Charles Marsh to Allosaurus medius in 1888.[5] In 1911
Richard Swann Lull named these as a new species of Dryptosaurus: Dryptosaurus grandis.[6] In 1920 Gilmore renamed them to a new species of Ornithomimus. However, because Ornithomimus grandis already existed, he renamed the species Ornithomimus affinis.[7] In 1972 Dale Russell renamed them as a second species of Archaeornithomimus: Archaeornithomimus affinis.[2] However, in 1990 Smith and Galton concluded that the remains were not ornithomimosaurian and came from some other small theropod.[3]
In 1995 a supposed third species of Archaeornithomimus was named by Lev A. Nesov: Archaeornithomimus bissektensis, based on the holotype N 479/12457, a
femur and
metatarsals of a juvenile, found in the
Bissekty Formation of
Uzbekistan, dating to the
Turonian-
Coniacian.[8] Nevertheless, the affinity of A. bissektensis is generally doubted or not mentioned.[9][10][11]
Description
Archaeornithomimus was a medium sized ornithomimosaur, reaching 3.4 m (11 ft) long and weighing over 71.5 kilograms (158 lb).[12][13] Solid evidence coming from other ornithomimosaurian relatives suggest that Archaeornithomimus was a feathered animal, with very
ratite-like feathers[14][15] and equipped with a keratinous beak.[16][17]
The hindlimbs were robustly built. The third
metatarsal was not pinched at the upper end, so the foot was not
arctometatarsalian.[3] The
cervical vertebrae are highly
pneumatized with very complex internal chambers across the
neural arches and the
centrum (body of the vertebra), indicating the presence of cervical
air sacs. The anterior
dorsal and some
caudal vertebrae features some degree of pneumacity, however, the
sacral vertebrae are apneumatic.[10]
In a 2001 study conducted by Bruce Rothschild and other paleontologists, 229 foot bones referred to Archaeornithomimus were examined for signs of
stress fracture, but none were found.[18]
Classification
Russell assigned Archaeornithomimus to the
Ornithomimidae.[2] Recent
cladistic analyses either confirm this or recover the species outside of the Ornithomimidae, basal in the
Ornithomimosauria. During the description of Hesperornithoides, an extensive
Coelurosauria phylogenetic analysis (also known as the Lori matrix) was conducted in order to determine the position of this paravian. Here, Archaeornithomimus was recovered within the
Garudimimidae being a relative of Arkansaurus:[11]
The remains of Archaeornithomimus were found in the
Iren Dabasu Formation, which dates back to the
Cenomanian stage about 96 million years ago during the
Late Cretaceous period.[4] The environments present on the formation were mainly large
floodplain terrains with
braided rivers and
meanders[19][20] that were connected to the ocean,[21] supporting extensive vegetation as seen on the
palaeosol development and the numerous remains from
herbivorous dinosaurs such as hadrosauroids.[19]
Like other members of the Ornithomimosauria, Archaeornithomimus was likely an
omnivore equipped with a
horny beak, eating everything from small mammals, to plants and fruit, to eggs, and even hatchlings of other Asian dinosaurs.[16][17]
^Gilmore, C. W. (1933). "On the dinosaurian fauna of the Iren Dabasu Formation". Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History. 67 (2): 23–78.
hdl:
2246/355.
^Nesov, L. A. (1995). "Dinozavri severnoi Yevrazii: Novye dannye o sostave kompleksov, ekologii i paleobiogeografii". Institute for Scientific Research on the Earth's Crust. St Petersburg State University: 1–156.
^Lee, Y.-N.; Barsbold, R.; Currie, P. J.; Kobayashi, Y.; Lee, H.-J.; Godefroit, P.; Escuillié, F.; Chinzorig, T. (2014). "Resolving the long-standing enigmas of a giant ornithomimosaur Deinocheirus mirificus". Nature. 515 (7526): 257–260.
Bibcode:
2014Natur.515..257L.
doi:
10.1038/nature13874.
PMID25337880.
S2CID2986017.
^Zelenitsky, D. K.; Therrien, F.; Erickson, G. M.; DeBuhr, C. L.; Kobayashi, Y.; Eberth, D. A.; Hadfield, F. (2012). "Feathered Non-Avian Dinosaurs from North America Provide Insight into Wing Origins". Science. 338 (6106): 510–514.
Bibcode:
2012Sci...338..510Z.
doi:
10.1126/science.1225376.
PMID23112330.
S2CID2057698.
^Van der Reest, A. J.; Wolfe, A. P.; Currie, P. J. (2016). "A densely feathered ornithomimid (Dinosauria: Theropoda) from the Upper Cretaceous Dinosaur Park Formation, Alberta, Canada". Cretaceous Research. 58: 108–117.
doi:
10.1016/j.cretres.2015.10.004.
^Rothschild, B.; Tanke, D. H.; Ford, T. L. (2001). "Theropod stress fractures and tendon avulsions as a clue to activity". In Tanke, D. H.; Carpenter, K.; Skrepnick, M. W. (eds.). Mesozoic Vertebrate Life. Indiana University Press. pp. 331–336.
ISBN9780253339072.