Treatment is typically with
immunosuppresive medication and, if a tumor is present, surgery to remove it.[1] With treatment, about 80% of cases have a good outcome.[1] Outcomes are better if treatment is begun earlier.[2] Long-term mental or behavioral problems may remain.[2] About 4% of those affected die from the condition.[2] Recurrence occurs in about 10% of people.[1]
The estimated number of cases of the disease is one in 1.5 million people per year.[8][6] The condition is relatively common compared to other
paraneoplastic disorders.[2] About 80% of those affected are female.[2] It typically occurs in adults younger than 45 years old, but it can occur at any age.[4][7] The disease was first described by Josep Dalmau in 2007.[1][9]
Signs and symptoms
Prior to the development of a symptom complex that is specific to anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis, people may experience prodromal symptoms, including
headaches,
flu-like illness, or symptoms similar to an
upper respiratory infection. These symptoms may be present for weeks or months prior to disease onset.[10] Beyond the
prodromal symptoms, the disease progresses at varying rates, and patients may present with a variety of neurological symptoms. During the initial stage of the disease, symptoms vary slightly between children and adults. However, behavior changes are a common first symptom within both groups. These changes often include
agitation,
paranoia,
delusions,[11]psychosis, and violent behaviors.[12] Other common manifestations include
seizures and bizarre movements, mostly of the lips and mouth, but also including pedaling motions with the legs or hand movements resembling playing a piano [citation needed]. Some other symptoms typical during the disease onset include impaired cognition, memory deficits, and speech problems (including
aphasia,
perseveration or
mutism).[13][14]
The symptoms usually appear psychiatric in nature, which may confound the differential diagnosis. In many cases, this leads to the illness going undiagnosed.[15] As the disease progresses, the symptoms become medically urgent and often include
autonomic dysfunction,
hypoventilation,
cerebellar ataxia,
loss of feeling on one side of the body,[16] loss of consciousness, or
catatonia.[17] During this acute phase, most patients require treatment in an intensive care unit to stabilize breathing, heart rate, and blood pressure.[citation needed] One distinguishing characteristic of anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis is the concurrent presence of many of the above listed symptoms. The majority of patients experience at least four symptoms, with many experiencing six or seven over the course of the disease.[13][14]
Pathophysiology
The condition is mediated by
autoantibodies that target NMDA receptors in the brain.[18] These can be produced by
cross reactivity with NMDA receptors in teratomas, which contain many cell types, including brain cells, and thus present a window in which a breakdown in
immunological tolerance can occur. Other autoimmune mechanisms are suspected for patients who do not have tumors. Whilst the exact pathophysiology of the disease is still debated, empirical evaluation of the origin of anti-NMDA receptor antibodies in
serum and
cerebrospinal fluid leads to the consideration of two possible mechanisms.[citation needed]
These mechanisms may be informed by some simple observations. Serum NMDA receptor antibodies are consistently found at higher concentrations than cerebrospinal fluid antibodies, on average ten times higher.[19][20] This strongly suggests the antibody production is systemic rather than in the brain or cerebrospinal fluid. When concentrations are normalized for total IgG, intrathecal synthesis is detected. This implies that there are more NMDA receptor antibodies in the cerebrospinal fluid than would be predicted given the expected quantities of total IgG.[citation needed]
Passive access involves the
diffusion of antibodies from the blood across a pathologically disrupted
blood-brain barrier (BBB).[21] This cellular filter, separating the central nervous system from the circulatory system, normally prevents larger molecules from entering the brain. A variety of reasons for such a collapse in integrity have been suggested, with the most likely answer being the effects of
acute inflammation of the nervous system. Likewise, the involvement of
corticotropin releasing hormone on
mast cells in acute stress has been shown to facilitate BBB penetration.[22] However, it is also possible that the autonomic dysfunction manifested in many patients during the later phases of the condition aids antibody entry. For example, an increase in blood pressure would force larger proteins, such as antibodies, to extravasate into the cerebrospinal fluid.
Intrathecal production (production of antibodies in the
intrathecal space) is also a possible mechanism.[23] Dalmau et al. demonstrated that 53 out of 58 patients with the condition had at least partially preserved BBBs, whilst having a high concentration of antibodies in the cerebrospinal fluid. Furthermore,
cyclophosphamide and
rituximab, drugs used to eliminate dysfunctional immune cells, have been shown to be successful second-line treatments in patients where first-line immunotherapy has failed.[24] These destroy excess antibody-producing cells in the
thecal sac, thus alleviating the symptoms.
A more sophisticated analysis of the processes involved in antibody presence in the cerebrospinal fluid hints at a combination of these two mechanisms in tandem.[citation needed]
Antibodies
Once the antibodies have entered the CSF, they bind to the NR1 subunit of the NMDA receptor. There are three possible methods in which neuronal damage occurs.
A reduction in the density of NMDA receptors on the post synaptic knob, due to receptor internalization once the antibody has bound. This is dependent on antibodies
cross linking.[25]
The direct
antagonism of the NMDA receptor by the antibody, similar to the action of the classic dissociative anesthetics
phencyclidine and
ketamine.
The recruitment of the
complement cascade via the classical pathway (antibody-antigen interaction). Membrane attack complex (MAC) is one of the end products of this cascade[26] and can insert into neurons as a molecular barrel, allowing water to enter. The cell subsequently lyses. Notably, this mechanism is unlikely as it causes the cell to die, which is inconsistent with current evidence.
Diagnosis
First and foremost is a high level of clinical suspicion, especially in young adults showing abnormal behavior as well as autonomic instability. Clinical examination may further reveal delusions and hallucinations, which can aid diagnostic efforts.[citation needed]
The initial investigation usually consists of clinical examination,
MRI of the brain, an
EEG, and a
lumbar puncture for
CSF analysis. MRI of the brain may show abnormalities in the temporal and frontal lobes, but do so in less than half of cases. A
FDG-PET scan of the brain may show abnormalities in cases when the MRI scan is normal.[27] EEG is abnormal in almost 90% of cases and typically shows general or focal slow wave activity.[28] CSF analysis often shows inflammatory changes with increased levels of
white blood cells, total protein and the presence of
oligoclonal bands.[29] NMDA receptor antibodies can be detected in serum and/or CSF. Whole body FDG-PET is usually performed as a part of tumor screening. Gynecological ultrasound or a pelvic MRI might be performed to search for an ovarian teratoma in women.
Diagnostic criteria for probable and definite anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis have been proposed to facilitate diagnosis at an early stage of the disease and help initiate early treatment.[30]
Management
If a person is found to have a tumor, the long-term prognosis is generally better and the chance of relapse is much lower. This is because the tumor can be removed surgically, thus eradicating the source of autoantibodies. In general, early diagnosis and aggressive treatment is believed to improve patient outcomes, but this remains impossible to know without data from randomized controlled trials.[13] Given that the majority of patients are initially seen by psychiatrists, it is critical that all physicians (especially psychiatrists) consider anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis as a possible cause of acute psychosis in young patients with no past neuropsychiatric history.[citation needed]
If a tumor is detected, its removal should occur in conjunction with first-line
immunotherapy. This involves
steroids to suppress the immune system,
intravenous immunoglobulin, and
plasmapheresis to physically remove autoantibodies. A study of 577 patients showed that over four weeks, about half the patients improved after receiving first-line immunotherapy.[13]
Second-line immunotherapy includes
rituximab, a
monoclonal antibody that targets the
CD20 receptor on the surface of
B cells, thus destroying the self-reactive B cells.
Cyclophosphamide, an
alkylating agent that cross-links DNA and is used to treat both
cancer and autoimmune diseases, has sometimes proven useful when other therapies have failed.
Other medications, such as
alemtuzumab, remain experimental.[31]
Prognosis
The recovery process from anti-NMDAR encephalitis can take many months. The symptoms may reappear in reverse order: The patient may begin to experience psychosis again, leading many people to falsely believe the patient is not recovering. As the recovery process continues on, the psychosis fades. Lastly, the person's social behavior and executive functions begin to improve.[10]
Epidemiology
The estimated number of cases of the disease is 1.5 per million people per year.[6] According to the California Encephalitis Project, the disease has a higher incidence than its individual viral counterparts in patients younger than 30.[32] The largest case series as of 2013 characterized 577 people with anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis. The data were limited, but provides the best approximation of disease distribution. It found that women make up 81% of cases. Disease onset is skewed toward children, with a median age of diagnosis of 21 years. Over a third of cases were children, while only 5% of cases were patients over the age of 45. This same review found that 394 out of 501 patients (79%) had a good outcome by 24 months.[13] 30 people (6%) died, and the rest were left with mild to severe deficits. The study mentioned that of the 38% presenting with tumors, 94% of those presented with ovarian
teratomas. Within that subset, African & Asian women were more likely to have a tumor, but this was not relevant to the prevalence of the disease within those racial groups.[13]
Dallas Cowboys defensive lineman
Amobi Okoye spent 17 months battling anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis. In addition to three months in a medically-induced coma, he experienced a 145-day memory gap and lost 78 pounds. He returned to practice on October 23, 2014.[38]
In the Japanese movie called The 8-Year Engagement, a young Japanese woman ends up being in a coma due to anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis.
Knut, a
polar bear at the
Berlin Zoological Garden that died on 19 March 2011, was diagnosed with anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis in August 2015. This was the first case discovered in a non-human animal.[39][40][41]
In Hannibal, Will Graham was affected by NMDA receptor or antibody encephalitis, also known as anti-NMDAR encephalitis.[42]
The TV series Something's Killing Me featured an episode called "Into Madness" that featured two cases of the disease.[43]
^
abcdeVenkatesan A, Adatia K (December 2017). "Anti-NMDA-Receptor Encephalitis: From Bench to Clinic". ACS Chemical Neuroscience. 8 (12): 2586–2595.
doi:
10.1021/acschemneuro.7b00319.
PMID29077387.
^Sébire G (January 2010). "In search of lost time from "Demonic Possession" to anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis". Annals of Neurology. 67 (1): 141–142.
doi:
10.1002/ana.21928.
PMID20186949.
S2CID2366741.