| |||||||||||||||||||
Two-Year State Budget Cycle Initiative | |||||||||||||||||||
Results | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Results by county | |||||||||||||||||||
[1] |
The 2012 California Proposition 31 was officially titled "State Budget. State and Local Government. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute." and was a California ballot measure that appeared on the ballot in the November 2012 California elections. The initiative would have established a two-year state budget, allowed the Governor to make budget cuts in fiscal emergencies, would have prevented the state Legislature from spending more than $25 million without creating spending cuts or other budget offsets, and would have allowed local governments the ability to transfer certain amounts of property taxes among themselves instead of the state. [2] [3] Although the law was supported by the California Republican Party multiple conservative groups came out against proposition 31 including members of the tea party movement who viewed the law as a way to undermine property rights. [4] [5] [6]
If Proposition 31 had passed it was estimated that the state government would have suffered a loss of $200 million as these funds would have been transferred to local governments. [7]
Newspaper | Position |
---|---|
Bay Area Reporter | Oppose |
Fresno Bee | Support |
Los Angeles Daily News | Support |
Los Angeles Times | Oppose |
Modesto Bee | Support |
Orange County Register | Oppose |
Sacramento Bee | Oppose |
San Diego Union-Tribune | Support |
San Francisco Bay Guardian | Oppose |
San Francisco Chronicle | Support |
San Jose Mercury News | Support |
Ventura County Star | Oppose |