From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
1962–1965 rubella epidemic
Disease Rubella
Virus strain Rubella virus
LocationUS, Europe
Date1962–1965

The 1962–1965 rubella epidemic was an outbreak of rubella across Europe and the United States. [1] [2]The Rubella virus, also known as the German measles, is a single-stranded RNA virus from the family Togaviridae and genus Rubivirus. [3] Typically, the virus is transmitted via droplets, such as coughing or sneezing, however, congenital rubella can be passed on from a pregnant woman to her fetus. The disease itself is fairly mild, usually presenting with a rash on the face and general sickness symptoms, such as coughing, fever, and fatigue, however, the real danger lies in Rubella infections in women who are pregnant. Pregnant women with Rubella are at risk of having a miscarriage or having a baby born with multiple birth defects due to Congenital rubella syndrome.

It affected around 12.5 million people in the US. An estimated 11,000 pregnancies ended in miscarriage or stillbirth, just over 2,000 newborn babies died, and of those that survived around 20,000 babies had congenital rubella syndrome (CRS). [4] [5] [6] [7] The amount of pregnant women affected by the disease had great repercussions on outlook of abortion. Roe v. Wade was passed in 1973, eight years after the Rubella epidemic that gave many Americans a different view on the termination of a pregnancy. [8]

The epidemic led the drive to develop a vaccine [9] which has helped the United States to see as little as 10 new Rubella cases a year. [4]

History

Due to the mild symptoms of Rubella, the disease was able to exist in many countries without much notice or attention. However, in 1942 an Australian Ophthalmologist, Norman Gregg, realized that the virus caused birth defects. [10] This led to many scientists and doctors putting more effort into understanding the disease and finding ways to prevent it. Twenty years after this discovery, an outbreak of Rubella took place in Europe and eventually made it way over to the United States. [11] In the few years it ran rampant, the Rubella virus affected millions of people and left 20,000 infants with CRS. As this epidemic took place after the successful isolation of the virus, scientists were able to work hard on developing a vaccine.

Abortion as Treatment

With new information out about the effects of the Rubella virus on a fetus, some expectant women and physicians wanted the termination of the pregnancy to be an option. Abortion was illegal in the United States at the height of this epidemic, however, physicians were allowed to perform therapeutic abortions if the believed the mother would be in danger or the fetus would be non-viable or suffer sever damage. [12] This allowed for some women to get an abortion when exposed to Rubella, but not all women who sought this treatment out succeeded, as the choice ultimately laid in the hands of the physicians and their personal views on abortion or the viability of the fetus.

The Rubella virus showed the American people that they needed abortion laws that didn't vary from physician to physician. It also helped in normalizing the idea of abortions in the United States, due to the sheer amount of women infected that sought out an abortion. It allowed some people to realize that abortion is a medical procedure that can be used when the pregnancy is dangerous.

See also

References

  1. ^ Howson, Christopher P.; Howe, Cynthia J.; Fineberg, Harvey V. (1991). "2. Histories of Pertussis and Rubella Vaccines". Adverse Effects of Pertussis and Rubella Vaccines: A Report of the Committee to Review the Adverse Consequences of Pertussis and Rubella Vaccines. National Academies Press (US). pp. 9–31.
  2. ^ Plotkin, S. A. (14 May 2001). "Rubella eradication". Vaccine. 19 (25–26): 3311–3319. doi: 10.1016/s0264-410x(01)00073-1. ISSN  0264-410X. PMID  11348695.
  3. ^ Parkman, Paul D. (1996), Baron, Samuel (ed.), "Togaviruses: Rubella Virus", Medical Microbiology (4th ed.), Galveston (TX): University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, ISBN  978-0-9631172-1-2, PMID  21413314, retrieved 2024-04-30
  4. ^ a b "Rubella in the United States | CDC". www.cdc.gov. 23 November 2022. Retrieved 23 September 2023.
  5. ^ "Rashes to Research: Scientists and Parents Confront the 1964 Rubella Epidemic | NLM". www.nlm.nih.gov. Retrieved 23 September 2023.
  6. ^ Sever, John L.; Nelson, Karin B.; Gilkeson, Mary Ruth (1 October 1965). "Rubella Epidemic, 1964: Effect on 6,000 Pregnancies: I. Preliminary Clinical and Laboratory Findings Through the Neonatal Period: A Report From the Collaborative Study on Cerebral Palsy". American Journal of Diseases of Children. 110 (4): 395–407. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1965.02090030415009. ISSN  0002-922X. PMID  4158019.
  7. ^ Reagan, Leslie J. (2012). Dangerous Pregnancies: Mothers, Disabilities, and Abortion in Modern America. University of California Press. ISBN  978-0-520-27457-0.
  8. ^ "Roe v. Wade v. Rubella". Science History Institute. Retrieved 2024-04-30.
  9. ^ Vesikari, Timo; Usonis, Vytautas (2021). "9. Measles-Mumps-Rubella vaccine". In Vesikari, Timo; Damme, Pierre Van (eds.). Pediatric Vaccines and Vaccinations: A European Textbook (Second ed.). Switzerland: Springer. pp. 82–83. ISBN  978-3-030-77172-0.
  10. ^ Cooper, L. Z. (1985). "The history and medical consequences of rubella". Reviews of Infectious Diseases. 7 (Suppl 1): S2–10. doi: 10.1093/clinids/7.supplement_1.s2. ISSN  0162-0886. PMID  3890105.
  11. ^ academic.oup.com https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/43/Supplement_3/S164/288915. Retrieved 2024-04-30. {{ cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= ( help)
  12. ^ Devereux, Mary (2011-03-01). "Dangerous pregnancies". The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 121 (3): 826. doi: 10.1172/JCI46158. ISSN  0021-9738. PMC  3049382.

Further reading