From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page transcludes all of the deletion debates opened today on the English-language Wikipedia, including articles, categories, templates, and others, as a convenience to XfD-watchers. Please note that because this material is transcluded, watchlisting this page will not provide you with watchlist updates about deletions; WP:DELT works best as a browser bookmark checked regularly.


Speedy deletion candidates

Articles

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

Dedrick D. Gobert

Dedrick D. Gobert (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Although he was memorable for his collaborations with John Singleton, none of his roles are significant enough per WP:NACTOR. The Film Creator ( talk) 13:56, 9 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:17, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

WXXW-LP

WXXW-LP (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 13:39, 9 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:17, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Nils Wetterholm

Nils Wetterholm (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to meet WP:MUSICIAN or WP:ACTOR. zoglophie •talk• 10:09, 9 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:16, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Sports broadcasting contracts in the Republic of Ireland

Sports broadcasting contracts in the Republic of Ireland (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTTVGUIDE applies here. The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN. Also, sources are primary sources, nothing but news announcements and none of those assert notability. Those arguing for a keep claiming how useful it is, shall be advised to refer to WP:USEFUL. SpacedFarmer ( talk) 09:08, 9 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:15, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Sports broadcasting contracts in Germany

Sports broadcasting contracts in Germany (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTTVGUIDE applies here. The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN. Also, sources are primary sources, nothing but news announcements and none of those assert notability. Those arguing for a keep claiming how useful it is, shall be advised to refer to WP:USEFUL. SpacedFarmer ( talk) 09:08, 9 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:15, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Yu Song-chol

Yu Song-chol (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 03:54, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Jang Jong-hyok

Jang Jong-hyok (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 03:52, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Taggart Crossing, Indiana

Taggart Crossing, Indiana (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This popped up while I was trying to verify a different place, and one look at the topos shows that it is a creek crossing, not a settlement. Mangoe ( talk) 03:32, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Balitaan (2013 TV program)

Balitaan (2013 TV program) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced since 2019. No good references obtained in GSearch, GBooks, GNews and GNews Archives. Suggest List of programs broadcast by People's Television Network as plausible WP:ATD -- Lenticel ( talk) 03:32, 2 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:15, 9 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:15, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Het Arubaanse Padvindsters Gilde

Het Arubaanse Padvindsters Gilde (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No secondary sourcing--and none that I can't find. Google News offers nothing but Facebook and Wikipedia (GNews, how you have fallen), but there's nothing else I can find, not in the regular search and not in books. It's unfortunate but not all scouting organizations are notable per WP:NCORP. Drmies ( talk) 01:25, 2 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Comment: Secondary sources exist (eg [4], [5], [6]), but both my Dutch and my Papiamento skills aren't good enough to include them. The little I understand suggests at least national notability. -- jergen ( talk) 09:03, 2 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    • Those prove that the organization exists--these are run of the mill newsy notes on a social club one would expect in a local publication/website. Drmies ( talk) 14:41, 2 April 2024 (UTC) reply
      • Keep. Aruba is a really small nation with less than 200,000 inhabitants so "local publication" equals "nationwide publication". In my eyes both criteria of WP:NGO are met. Keep. -- jergen ( talk) 15:09, 2 April 2024 (UTC) reply
        • Well, this meets all the requirements of the kind of local reporting we usually discredit: a totally mundane event written up in highly promotional language--and that's the best of the three sources. Drmies ( talk) 16:03, 2 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Caribbean. WCQuidditch 04:26, 2 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:51, 9 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:15, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Sabado Barkada

Sabado Barkada (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged as unreferenced since 2009 but was actually unreferenced since 2006. No good hits on GNews and GBooks. GNews archives only turned out two ads related to it. Alternatively, Redirect to List of programs broadcast by ABS-CBN. -- Lenticel ( talk) 02:27, 9 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:12, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Alyosha (tank)

Alyosha (tank) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Questionable notability; lack of WP:RS to establish notability Amigao ( talk) 02:04, 9 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Delete or merge to T-80 models. The article is very poorly sourced, and "video footage" is not going to add reliability or credibility (it's easy to fabricate). In the doctrine of Russian military deception there is explicitly a measure named "Disinformation" (дезинформация). Under this measure, Russia actively seeks military advantage by tactics such as "untrue information to journalists". This accompanies concealment, imitation, simulation, and demonstrative manoeuvres (false trails). In other words, denial and deception come as standard in war or peace, and this is war. Do we believe that Putin congratulated some soldiers as heroes, etc? Yes. Do we believe that this was the work of one super-tankish-tank and its heroic crew? Not especially. Is this an encyclopedic article? No. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 13:33, 9 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    The purpose of this article is to tell the history of the tank similarly to other articles about named tanks such as Eagle 7 or Bomb Salfanto ( talk) 15:06, 9 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    Also I believe that wikipedia is best when not biased to one side Salfanto ( talk) 15:27, 9 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:12, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

WAST-LP

WAST-LP (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 01:45, 9 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Wisconsin. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 01:45, 9 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep I have added several references, most offline to NewsBank (Duluth paper is some of the hardest to obtain anywhere — that can be said of any Forum Communications paper!). There is SIGCOV of its very short-lived news operation. Sammi Brie (she/her •  tc) 05:55, 10 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep: Each of the sources added by Sammi provide the WP:SIGCOV needed for this subject to meet the WP:GNG. Let'srun ( talk) 04:11, 15 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: More review of new sources would be welcome.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:11, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

University of Colorado Physical Therapy Program

University of Colorado Physical Therapy Program (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite being a large article, it appears to have been mostly edited by COI editors and contains original research that isn't backed up by sources. The far majority of references are simply from the university's website, and as such notability isn't proven due to the lack of outside sourcing. ~ Eejit43 ( talk) 01:40, 9 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello Eejit43, thank you for the valuable feedback! I am presently retrieving outside sources to backup the information presented in this article. I am aware of the problem of promotion of interests on WP and how many hide their identity. My hope is that being transparent will help, along with the pending external citations that will demonstrate impact and notability both locally and nationally. Mikepascoe ( talk) 13:28, 13 April 2024 (UTC) reply
Hello all,
  • An initial draft of the article had 31 cuanschutz.edu (internal) sources + 23 external (independent) sources = 54 total.
  • The present version now has 19 internal + 42 external source = 61 total.
  • The percentage of sources from the university website (Eejit43's original comment) has decreased from 57% to 31%.
  • Further improvements can be made, thank you for your continued review
Mikepascoe ( talk) 14:49, 15 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:10, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Comment I'm not really seeing any SIGCOV from secondary sources. A selective merge might still be the best way forward.- KH-1 ( talk) 04:25, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Tsar (tank)

Tsar (tank) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG, and appears to be a WP:COATRACK article. The War Zone is the only reference that even mentions this tank in any level of detail, and even then, in an article that only relies on Twitter and Telegram posts, so no RS has covered the subject of this article to any significant degree. Loafiewa ( talk) 00:32, 9 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Keep The article simply needs more sources. Salfanto ( talk) 12:33, 9 April 2024 (UTC) reply
I say this because the story of the tank is relatively recent Salfanto ( talk) 12:50, 9 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Comment: Three questions, mostly directed to Salfanto but any editor may take them up:
  1. Do the sources this article simply needs exist? If yes, then please present them here.
  2. If the answer to the above question is no, then should we reasonably expect supporting reliable, independent sources demonstrating significant coverage to emerge in the near future? If yes, then this article was created WP:TOOSOON, but userification/draftification might be a viable alternative to deletion until such sources emerge.
  3. If the answer to the above question is no, then is a redirect to T-72 operators and variants#Soviet Union and Russia a viable alternative to deletion?
Thanks, IgnatiusofLondon (he/him☎️) 16:52, 9 April 2024 (UTC) reply
Thank you for asking these questions.
So far I have found 3 sources which call the tank Tsar.
https://en.defence-ua.com/news/characteristics_of_trophy_russian_tsar_ew_for_t_72b3m_tank_given_by_ukrainian_expert-10115.html
https://interestingengineering.com/military/russia-anti-drone-tank
https://www.twz.com/news-features/ukraine-situation-report-russian-anti-drone-electronic-warfare-tank-captured
Again, tank you for asking me those questions (pun intended) Salfanto ( talk) 12:22, 10 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Could we get a review of the sources brought to this discussion?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:06, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • delete This seems to be a single tank with a bunch of field modifications which got taken a week ago. It's way too soon to think that there is going to be lasting interest in one tank, especially given that the modifications appear not to have worked. Mangoe ( talk) 03:40, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Attack of the 5 Ft. 2 In. Women

Attack of the 5 Ft. 2 In. Women (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing in the article or my BEFORE suggests this meets WP:GNG (or WP:NFILM). Nothing in GBooks or GScholar (well, one mention in a German book?). Maybe there is some coverage in National Lampoon (magazine) ( September/October 1994), but it is a parody magazine, so not sure if it is reliable, and even if there is something there, GNG requires multiple sources (so at least one more). Can anyone find anything to rescue this - or failing that, suggest a valid redirect target? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:38, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Takeshi Nakashima

Takeshi Nakashima (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The source within the entry is the player database, I couldn't find other sources, and the player actually only kicked one season. 日期20220626 ( talk) 01:05, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Jacques Bonjawo

Jacques Bonjawo (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The sources here are primary and there is only sources about quotes online. I think this is not enough to scratch notability yet. Cleo Cooper ( talk) 00:35, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Speedy delete per G11. Pure puffery, no evidence of notability. Schrödinger's jellyfish  00:38, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Matt Purcell (businessman)

Matt Purcell (businessman) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Last AfD was no consensus. Created by a single purpose editor. An orphan article. I don't see his achievements adding to notability. Fails WP:AUTHOR and WP:BIO. Article claims he's a musician but I don't see evidence of that. LibStar ( talk) 00:28, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

World-Wide Spectrum Efficiency

World-Wide Spectrum Efficiency (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Potentially un-notable, does not cite any sources (and has not since 2021), uses the wrong tone. Though tone is less of an issue, and non-notability and no sources are the big one thetechie@wikimedia: ~/talk/ $ 00:14, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Weak Keep but burn to the ground and rewrite. This group does seem to have been discussed widely back around 2004-05: [7], [8], [9] (note that the CNet article was long before Red Ventures turned the site into an AI-generated garbage heap). The coverage may not quite be "significant" in all cases, but is there. Regardless, the article is absolutely awful and is inexcusable in its current form. Also, note that more recently the abbreviation WWiSE has been used for an unrelated software package: [10]. WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk) 00:38, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Technology. WCQuidditch 04:18, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎. theleekycauldron ( talk • she/her) 04:57, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Shipping discourse

Shipping discourse (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Again, I don't see how a bunch of bored academics+A bunch of very bored journalists with nothing better to write about+a bunch of very bored people with nothing better to talk about=The sex lives and proclivities of a bunch of imaginary people. Americanfreedom ( talk) 04:38, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Speedy keep as this article is currently on the main page ( WP:SKCRIT#6). Elli ( talk | contribs) 04:42, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Speedy keep. This nomination reads like WP:IDONTLIKEIT, no actual reason for deletion has been provided. Di (they-them) ( talk) 04:50, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Speedy keep. There are no issues with the quality or notability of this article and WP:SIGCOV is clearly satisfied here despite the topic being a relatively new internet phenomenon. "it's strange/frivolous" is not a valid deletion rationale. This AfD and Americanfreedom's repeated (ab)use of the prod tag is pure WP:IDONTLIKEIT.
(Disclaimer: I have discussed this article off-wiki with its creator, Generalissima, on several occasions, however, she did not in any way prompt me to participate in this AfD and the opinion expressed here is my own.) Ethmostigmus ( talk) 04:54, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Files

File:Komagata Maru Charterer Gurdit Singh and Passengers Landing.jpg

File:Komagata Maru Charterer Gurdit Singh and Passengers Landing.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by UpDater ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

A cropped lower resolution version of File:Sikhs aboard Komagata Maru.jpg. Magog the Ogre ( t c) 00:46, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

OK, thanks for bringing this to my attention. Let's delete File:Komagata Maru Charterer Gurdit Singh and Passengers Landing.jpg UpDater ( talk) 03:43, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

File:Lynyrd SkynyrdFreeBirdSolo.ogg

File:Lynyrd SkynyrdFreeBirdSolo.ogg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by AdamjVogt ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

De-PRODding reason from an admin was this: The article states that this is one of the greatest guitar solos of all time. It IS the song, the heart of it. This implies that, per WP:NFC#Audio clips, critical commentary should suffice to save the sample from deletion. However, even with critical commentary, I still doubt that the whole sample itself is significant contextually to the whole nine- or ten-minute song.

The whole sample sure is a portion of "one of the greatest guitar solos", but the whole song (recording) is not about that guitar solo, even as "greatest" as it may have been. The song has lyrics lasting five, six, or seven minutes.

Furthermore, the phrase "one of the greatest guitar solos" and the whole sample provide the same role: driving a reader into seeking the whole, full studio recording... or live one of the same song and letting the reader decide for oneself. Moreover, the 30-second sample either doesn't fully explain why the whole guitar solo is the "greatest" or is more about the portion itself than about the whole guitar solo (or the whole song).

Or, words are enough per WP:FREER to explain (what) the whole song (is about) or... (that) the whole song (is more than just the "greatest guitar solo"), and the sample itself doesn't need to be in the project. Speaking of "greatest", "greatest" can be subjective, yet the sample isn't that adequate, in my opinion. The whole recording at any length does the better explanation than any sample/portion.

In short, even meeting "critical commentary" rule doesn't absolve the sample's potential failures to comply with the whole NFCC, especially the "contextual significance" one. George Ho ( talk) 04:56, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

File:James Brown - It's a Man's Man's Man's World.ogg

File:James Brown - It's a Man's Man's Man's World.ogg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by RTSthestardust ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

De-PRODded for this reason: Annulation de suppression d'audio. L'audio permet au lecteur de connecter la chanson avec l'article en associant le titre à un extrait de la chanson. Helping readers identify the James Brown song It's a Man's Man's Man's World isn't sufficient to absolve the sample's potential failures to be contextually significant the whole song (recording). Rather it does the same thing that free text can do: drive readers into seeking and listening the whole song.

Furthermore, nothing in the sample indicates why omitting the sample from the article would harm readers' understanding of the whole song, honestly. Regardless of familiarity and legacy, I hear lyrics, and music simultaneously, and I hear performance. However, the content given is all I hear, and I still haven't found the sample to fulfillingly help me understand the whole song. Oh, and understanding ≠ identifying. George Ho ( talk) 05:08, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

File:Get Ready For This - 2 Unlimited.ogg

File:Get Ready For This - 2 Unlimited.ogg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by The lorax ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

De-PRODding rationale was this: Music sample should NOT be deleted as it is necessary to understand the article. Unfortunately, necessity rationale doesn't absolve the sample's potential failure to prove why omitting the sample harms the understanding of the whole song, the omission one part of WP:NFCC#8. The song was initially a composition, but then lyrics were added in another recording.

The whole sample is just music with one spoken line, and its role is the same as what free text already does: drive readers into seeking and then listening (versions of) the whole song. Furthermore, it doesn't fully represent (what) the whole song/composition (is about) and (how) the whole song/composition (had been done). George Ho ( talk) 05:24, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Categories

NEW NOMINATIONS

Category:LGBT-related music

Nominator's rationale: An odd entry in Category:LGBT arts, because of the "-related" adjective not shared by any parent category (but shared by some subcategories that may need to be renamed as well). Sister categories at that level (in LGBT arts) are just LGBT dance, LGBT literature, LGBT arts organizations, LGBT theatre, and LGBT art‎. No "-related" anywhere there. Another option would be to rename everything to the form of 'X about Y", although I am not sure if "about LGBT" sounds best (ex. "Music about LGBT"?). For now, removing "-related" from that tree might be easiest in terms of standardization. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:31, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Comment, I guess it is called "-related" because it also contains LGBT musicians and LGBT musical groups subcategories who do not necessarily create LGBT content. Marcocapelle ( talk) 04:41, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Category:Songs against capitalism

Nominator's rationale: Generally, our songs by topic categories are 'about' not 'against'. Ex. Category:Songs about poverty. This is also subcat to Category:Songs about consumerism, not Category:Songs against consumerism... Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:27, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Lean to delete, it is quite a stretch to say that these songs are about capitalism. I found several that are just critical of modern society in general, some others about the labour movement. Marcocapelle ( talk) 04:51, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Category:Songs against racism and xenophobia

Nominator's rationale: Generally our songs by topic categories are 'about' not 'against'. Ex. Category:Songs about poverty. See also Category:Songs about social issues. I suggest renaming this; the other category that may need similar treatment would be Category:Songs against capitalism (subcat to Category:Songs about consumerism, not Category:Songs against consumerism...). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:25, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Category:Dos Santos family (Angolan business family)

Nominator's rationale: No need for disambiguation. User:Namiba 00:22, 8 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 01:54, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Category:.io video games

Nominator's rationale: Non-defining trait. This simply indicates that the game in question has it's web hostname in the .io TLD. It is akin to having a category for ".com video games", ".org video games", etc. There is no connection between these games from a developer, publisher, or otherwise manner. -- ferret ( talk) 16:08, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I will note the TfD was closed as delete, FWIW.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkl talk 17:53, 8 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 01:53, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Category:Recipients of the Padma Shri in literature & education

Convert Category:Recipients of the Padma Shri in literature & education to article List of Recipients of the Padma Shri in literature and education
Nominator's rationale: WP:NONDEF. Should probably be listified. PepperBeast (talk) 19:51, 8 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per WP:OCAWARD. Lists already exist, starting with List of Padma Shri award recipients (1954–1959). Marcocapelle ( talk) 20:10, 8 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Keep as this awards are defining characteristic of recipients and they are frequently labelled as Padma Awardee in references. Another reason is lists of Padma awardees are not by their fields but by year. Each list contains all awardee of all field in a year. So field-wise categories help to find awardees in perticular field too like above literature and education.- Nizil ( talk) 11:54, 14 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, House Blaster ( talk · he/him) 01:51, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Redirects

Dale Becker

Couldn't find Wiren Dale Becker referred to with only his middle name, anywhere. jlwoodwa ( talk) 01:49, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dale Becker for the original article under that title. jlwoodwa ( talk) 01:50, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Japanator.com

Target article doesn't mention Japanator. Anyone has any idea? Neocorelight ( Talk) 01:43, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Templates and Modules

Template:Disney Adventure World

Presumably Template:Walt Disney Studios Park will be moved to this space once the park is officially renamed in 2025. This is 100% jumping the gun. GSK ( talkedits) 00:49, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Miscellany

Deletion review