- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was merge to
Template:Infobox region symbols.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:13, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
reply
Propose merging
Template:Infobox U.S. state symbols with
Template:Infobox region symbols.
Template:Infobox region symbols accomplishes much of the same job, but can be embedded in other infobox templates. The global template has 1195 transclusions in the article space, the U.S. specific one has 51. The fields that
Template:Infobox U.S. state symbols offers that
Template:Infobox region symbols would be missing are Amphibian, Cactus, Cat, Crustacean, Dog, Domestic animal, Horse, Marsupial, Mushroom, Pet, Reptile, Dinosaur, Firearm, Poem, Shell, Ship, Slogan, Soil, and Tartan. The first 12 of those I envision states using the existing "animal" or "plant" fields with a bulleted list in a
Template:Plainlist wrapper and parentheses if necessary. The other seven I feel could be added to
Template:Infobox region symbols without too much fuss, I envision modeling the U.S. additions after the India-specific additions.
I think we can also take the opportunity to leave behind the U.S. state quarters. They were interesting in the early aughts, but I don't think they will continue to be symbols of the states in decades to come, the way a flag or anthem are likely to be. One idea
Template:Infobox region symbols might take from
Template:Infobox U.S. state symbols is the divide between living and inanimate insignia. This merger was actually
suggested by
Frietjes
in August 2020 in an ultimately unsuccessful merge proposal with
Template:Infobox settlement.--
Patrick Neil,
oѺ∞/Talk 20:54, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Support Merge, but oppose getting rid of the state quarters because of
WP:NTEMP (once notable, always notable)
Atavoidturk (
talk) 14:50, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 23:02, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Oppose Unnecessary.
2001:8003:913E:5D01:E459:423D:A45E:2DDF (
talk) 05:33, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Support per
Atavoidturk.
Thrakkx (
talk) 15:47, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on
2023 February 1.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:12, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:12, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
reply
No transclusions, documentation, categories, or incoming links. Created in 2016. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 20:22, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Delete, probably a remmant of the notorios MDWiki translation project, not needed, not used.
SandyGeorgia (
Talk) 21:02, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- That is extremely disrespectful, uncivil, and most of all a false description of the project. If you could please consider that others, even if inactive, may get mail about these things. This is not related to MDwiki.
CFCF (
talk) 11:25, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- For what it's worth: This template appears to have been related to the
Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/Translation task force, a page that links to
a site called mdwiki.org. The page was originally created at
Wikipedia:TTF/Direct translation link (
Wikipedia:TTF is a redirect to
Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/Translation task force). The page was moved from the original location, which seems like a sensible place for it to have been if it was used for that task force, to a somewhat reasonable template name (
Template:TTF direct translation link), and then to the current inscrutable template name. For what it's worth. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 02:51, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Delete as unused.
Izno (
talk) 03:51, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nomination. --
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 00:19, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Delete —
DaxServer (
t ·
m ·
c) 20:41, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:11, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
reply
Template without content and not in use.
Pelmeen10 (
talk) 18:11, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Currently empty, but could be expanded with info from
[1] and
[2]. This section
w:MC Saïda § Current squad is also not helpful because it, too, is empty.
BhamBoi (
talk) 06:03, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:11, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
reply
Replaced by
Module:Adjacent stations/Bangladesh Railways. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 17:15, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:49, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
unused after being merged with the parent article with attribution.
Frietjes (
talk) 16:22, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:49, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
unused after being merged with the parent article with attribution.
Frietjes (
talk) 16:22, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:49, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
unused after being merged with the parent article with attribution.
Frietjes (
talk) 16:22, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:48, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
unused after being merged with the parent article with attribution.
Frietjes (
talk) 16:22, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was keep.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:11, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
reply
Serves no purpose - none of the articles listed are "about" Cain to any particular extent, and are or can be wikilinked in the article
ITBF (
talk) 13:28, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 15:25, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
1952 Summer Olympics field hockey game reference templates
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:47, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
Former single use templates which have been substed in
Field hockey at the 1952 Summer Olympics with attribution. No longer needed, content can be reused in other articles using
WP:LST if necessary.
ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (
talk) 06:48, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 14:16, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
Single-use templates. Subst and delete.
Izno (
talk) 04:06, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).