Page extended-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Requests for permissions

    This page enables administrators to handle requests for permissions on the English Wikipedia. Administrators are able to modify account creator, autopatrolled, confirmed, file mover, extended confirmed, mass message sender, new page reviewer, page mover, pending changes reviewer, rollback, and template editor rights, and AutoWikiBrowser access.

    Editors wishing to request a permission flag here should do so following the procedure below. Editors requesting permissions are advised to periodically revisit the requests page, as notifications will not always be given after a decision is made. Editors should not expect their request to be answered right away and should remember to be patient when filing a request. To find out what permissions your account has, go to Special:Preferences, where your permissions are listed in the user profile tab under "Member of groups".

    Requests for permissions are archived regularly; please see Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Archive for an index of past requests.

    Bot report: No errors! Report generated at 18:20, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

    Permissions

    Handled here

    • Account creator ( add requestview requests): The account creator flag is granted to users who are active in the request an account process. The flag removes the limit on the maximum number of new accounts that can be created in a 24 hour period. It also allows users to make accounts with names similar to other accounts. The account creator flag is only given to users who participate in the ACC process and may be removed without notice should a user's participation in the account creation process cease.
    • Autopatrolled ( add requestview requests): The autopatrolled flag is granted to users who are active in the creation of new articles. This tool is granted so their creations are auto patrolled in Special:NewPages. Unlike other requests, any user may nominate an editor for Autopatrolled, even without that user's consent. A user who wishes to have this flag generally should have created at least 25 articles and must be trusted, experienced, and must have demonstrated they are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, especially WP:BLP and Wikipedia:Notability.
    • AutoWikiBrowser ( add requestview requests): AutoWikiBrowser is a semi-automated MediaWiki editor for Microsoft Windows, designed to make tedious repetitive tasks quicker and easier. It is essentially a browser that automatically opens up a new page when the last is saved. When set to do so, it suggests some changes (typically formatting) that are generally meant to be incidental to the main change. Please read the rules of use and registration requirements on the main page before requesting permission. This is not a true user right, but access needs to be granted by administrators just like other permissions. If approved, your name will be added to the CheckPage. Users with under 250 non-automated mainspace edits or 500 total mainspace edits are rarely approved. You will need to give a reason for wanting AWB access.
    • Confirmed ( add requestview requests): The confirmed flag may be granted to new users who have not yet hit the threshold for autoconfirmed status. These are users who have not had both 10 edits and 4 days experience. People with this flag can upload files and edit semi-protected pages before hitting the autoconfirmed flag. Users requesting this flag must indicate clearly why they should be exempted from the customary confirmation period.
    • Event coordinator ( add requestview requests): The event coordinator user right allows editors to create multiple new accounts, and to temporarily confirm accounts so that they can create new articles.
    • Extended confirmed ( add requestview requests): The extended confirmed flag is normally automatically added to accounts after 500 edits and 30 days, but may be added to legitimate alternate accounts of users that already have this access. The flag allows users to edit pages under extended confirmed protection.
    • File mover ( add requestview requests): The file mover user right is intended to allow users experienced in working with files to rename them, subject to policy, with the ease that autoconfirmed users already enjoy when renaming Wikipedia articles.
    • Mass message sender ( add requestview requests): Mass message sender enables users to send messages to multiple users at once. This flag is given to users who have made requests for delivery in the past, clearly showing an understanding of the guidance for use.
    • New page reviewer ( add requestview requests): The new page reviewer user right allows users to mark pages as patrolled and use the page curation toolbar. At administrators' discretion, the right may be accorded on a time limited basis or indefinite.
    • Page mover ( add requestview requests): The page mover user right allows users experienced in working with article names to move them, subject to policy, without leaving behind a redirect. They may also move all subpages when moving the parent page(s). General guidelines include making 3,000 edits and 6 months of editing history. At administrators' discretion, the right may be accorded on a time limited basis or indefinite.
    • Pending changes reviewer ( add requestview requests): The reviewer flag is granted to users who are experienced enough with Wikipedia editing and its policies for contributing to the process of reviewing articles placed under pending changes.
    • Rollback ( add requestview requests): Rollback enables users to remove vandalism much more quickly and efficiently than by undoing it. Users who do not demonstrate an understanding of what constitutes capable vandalism fighting, either because they have no or little history of doing so, or show a poor ability to discern between good and bad faith edits will not be granted this right. Also, it is unlikely that editors with under 200 mainspace edits will have their request granted. For a more detailed explanation of rollback and information about when it is appropriate to use the tool, see Wikipedia:Rollback. For information about the technical details of the feature, see here.
    • Template editor ( add requestview requests): The template editor flag allows users to edit protected templates and Lua modules. General guidelines for granting include making at least 1,000 edits overall (with at least 150 to templates or modules), being a registered user for over a year, and having a record of successfully proposing significant edits to several protected templates. Users should demonstrate proficiency with template syntax and an understanding of the need for caution when editing heavily-used templates.

    Handled elsewhere

    Several permissions are requested and handled elsewhere:

    Removal of permissions

    If you wish to have any of your permission flags (except administrator) removed, you should contact an administrator. If you want your administrator flag removed, you should contact a bureaucrat.

    This is not the place to request review of another user's rights. If you believe someone's actions merit removal of a permission flag, you should raise your concern at the incidents noticeboard.

    The bureaucrat, checkuser, and oversight flags are removed at meta:Steward requests/Permissions. Stewards will typically not carry out such requests unless they are made on behalf of the Arbitration Committee, by a user who is requesting their own access be removed, or in cases of an emergency.

    Process

    Requestors

    To make a request for a permission, click "add request" next to the appropriate header and fill in the reason for wanting permission.

    Any editor may comment on requests for permission.

    Administrators

    Administrators are permitted to grant account creator, autopatrolled, confirmed, event coordinator, file mover, mass message sender, new page reviewer, page mover, pending changes reviewer, rollback and template editor flags to any user who meets the criteria explained above and can be trusted not to abuse the tool(s). Administrators may either grant these permissions permanently or temporarily. For convenience, a bot will automatically comment with relevant data if the user does not meet configurable qualifications. Even if the bot does not comment, administrators should review the user's contributions and logs to ensure the tools will be used appropriately and check for any indication of potential misuse.

    Once an administrator has granted a permission or decided to deny a request, they should add {{ done}} or {{ not done}} respectively under the request with their comments. If a user already has the requested permission, or is autoconfirmed and requesting confirmed, {{ already done}} should be used. N hours after the last comment was made (as specified by the config), the request will be archived automatically: approved requests will be placed here; declined requests will go here. See User:MusikBot/PermClerk#Archiving for more information on archiving functionality.

    Other editors

    Requests for permissions is primarily intended for editors requesting a permission for their own account. Other editors are welcome to comment if they have specific information that is relevant to that request that a patrolling administrator is unlikely to discover for themselves. Otherwise, since only administrators can effectively respond to these requests, general comments or 'clerking' by other users are rarely helpful. Non-administrators cannot "decline" to grant a request, because they're not in a position to accept it.

    A limited exception to this is Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled, where third party nominations are encouraged. Other editors should still avoid offering general remarks on requests and leave the final decision to an administrator.

    Current requests

    Account creator


    Autopatrolled

    User:Wikipedialuva

    Creates short, focussed article that are consistently suitable during patrol; an experienced editor most active in areas other than page creation. Klbrain ( talk) 14:17, 24 April 2024 (UTC) reply


    AutoWikiBrowser


    User:Dxneo

    I would like to help with fixing typos. I want to spread my wings and work on the other side of the encyclopedia. dxneo ( talk) 01:03, 22 April 2024 (UTC) reply

     Done. Primefac ( talk) 07:30, 22 April 2024 (UTC) reply

    User:A smart kitten

    I'd like to request AWB permissions, in order to be able to make repetitive and non-controversial changes more efficiently than by hand. I sometimes come across situations where this would be beneficial - e.g., a couple of months ago, I noticed that there were a number of featured lists that were only marked as List-Class in {{WikiProject Lists}}. My current reason for requesting is in order to perform cleanup following the closure of this RfD discussion - to migrate the redirects on this list to use {{ R from subtitle alone}}, & to migrate the rest of the transclusions of {{ R from subtitle}} to {{ R from title and subtitle}}. I have read through and understand the AWB Guide & the AWB Rules.

    If this request is granted, please can my alt account a smart kitten (AWB) [ verify be added to the checkpage? (Also, as my alt, please can it be granted confirmed and XC in case any pages are protected?)

    Let me know if there are any queries. All the best, ‍—‍ a smart kitten[ meow 10:50, 24 April 2024 (UTC) reply



    Confirmed


    Event coordinator


    Extended confirmed


    File mover


    Mass message sender



    New page reviewer

    User:Aplucas0703

    I have made many constructive edits to Wikipedia, and have a decent amount of experience in Articles for Creation, and I have approved AfC reviewer for nearly 1 year. I have had no controversy thus far while working in this area. I mainly want to focus on patrolling the backlog of redirects, but occasionally I would also review articles. I also know my limits, and only work in the areas I am confident in, or I seek help. I am big on assuming the good faith of editors and pointing them in the right direction if their efforts are misguided, as I often do at AfC. aaronneallucas ( talk) 04:40, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

    User:Dan Leonard

    I'm nearing the end of my trial period just as the May backlog begins and I'd like to keep my permissions to participate. I've been intermittently active with new page patrol and I think my page curation log should show fairly uncontroversial activity and AfDs with consensus for my proposals. Reviewing the log myself there are two articles I marked as reviewed but were later deleted, but both appear to have been deleted for G5 (created by banned user) and not for notability or other content reasons. Dan 06:05, 15 April 2024 (UTC) reply

     Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Spicy (expires 14:12, 18 April 2024 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 06:10, 15 April 2024 (UTC) reply
     Done Hey man im josh ( talk) 15:54, 23 April 2024 (UTC) reply

    User:Klbrain

    I'm coming to the end of a two-month trial, and write to request that this access be extended. I've worked on NPP and, as asked, AfD. Many of these AfDs have been my proposals, which has been a helpful learning experience! Klbrain ( talk) 09:44, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

     Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Hey man im josh (expires 00:00, 27 April 2024 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 10:22, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply
     Done. Hey man im josh ( talk) 15:56, 23 April 2024 (UTC) reply

    User:Grahaml35

    Hello! In December of 2023 I applied for New Page Reviewer Rights and given a 1 month trial period then again in January of 2024 I was granted 3 months. I am here today to apply for permanent rights. Over the last 90 days I have reviewed 370 articles. A short background on myself I've been on Wikipedia for over eight years and have created 47 active article on EN Wikipedia. I have strong knowledge of the policies that a NPP reviewer must follow and how each article should be treated. I would like to to continue to help decease the large article backlog currently on Wikipedia. I would be happy to answer any questions. Thank you! Grahaml35 ( talk) 17:17, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply

     Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 18 April 2024 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 17:20, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply
     Done Hey man im josh ( talk) 16:00, 23 April 2024 (UTC) reply

    User:Knowledgegatherer23

    I would like to participate in the upcoming backlog drive. I have done a trial period before. Knowledgegatherer23 ( Say Hello) 17:46, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply

    User:Orange sticker

    Hi, I'd like to help with the backlog, I enjoy doing maintenance tasks like WP:CAT and WP:ORPHAN and I've submitted AfDs for articles I've come across in this process:

    as well as taking part in more contentious deletions. Obviously still learning but have experience of quite a few different outcomes now such as redirect, merge and transwiki options. Orange sticker ( talk) 11:33, 18 April 2024 (UTC) reply

     Not done. Thank you for volunteering, but I'm going to deny this for now due to a lack of experience with the policy process (I'm seeing only 4 AFDs participated in). You're making good contributions, but I'd like to see more activity at WP:AFD to demonstrate an understanding of notability and relevant guidelines before you re-apply. Hey man im josh ( talk) 17:09, 23 April 2024 (UTC) reply

    User:SafariScribe

    Hi, I'm volunteering to help in patrolling new pages on Wikipedia. Over the months I have stayed here, I've learnt much on relating with editors including the early mistakes I did at first; those have improved my person. It's also pleasing participating in the May drive. Thanks for considering me.—  Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 15:40, 18 April 2024 (UTC) reply

    Thank you for volunteering,  Done for a 2-month trial. You are encouraged to re-apply roughly a week before the permission is set to expire. Hey man im josh ( talk) 16:43, 23 April 2024 (UTC) reply

    User:NYMan6

    Hi, I would like to start start volunteering to help patrol pages across the Wikipedia site. I've been on the site for quite some time, sometimes I may make some mistakes around but it has led me to create more pages and overall be a more active person. I find it pleasing to help Wikipedia more and make it a more pleasing, friendly and diligent environment of people. Thank you for looking through, and hope whoever sees this has a blessed day. NYMan6 ( talk) 20:59, 18 April 2024 (UTC) reply

     Not done. Thank you for volunteering, but I'm going to decline this for now. There's not enough demonstrated knowledge of content policies and guidelines for me to evaluate at this point in time. Experience with notability guidelines can be demonstrated in many ways, including participation at Articles for deletion or Articles for Creation and deletion tagging ( PROD and speedy deletion). If you're interested in re-applying at some point I encourage you to participate at WP:AFD. If you choose to do so, make sure your votes are policy based and explain why an article does or doesn't meet a specific guideline. Hey man im josh ( talk) 16:21, 23 April 2024 (UTC) reply

    User:GSS

    I was added to this group on a 2-month trial period and was instructed by Hey man im josh to re-apply a week before the permission expires. Therefore, I'm requesting to continue using this tool so I can review newly created articles. Thank you. GSS💬 05:12, 20 April 2024 (UTC) reply

     Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Hey man im josh (expires 00:00, 26 April 2024 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 05:20, 20 April 2024 (UTC) reply

    User:PharyngealImplosive7

    I was granted new page reviewer rights temporarily and I think that I'm ready to get them permanently since I've tagged and patroled over 50 pages now. I've also tagged many pages for deletion that were unfit for the wiki. Finally, I would like to participate in the May backlog drive. I thank the reviewing admin for their time and hope that I will be granted this perm. – PharyngealImplosive7 (talk) 16:45, 20 April 2024 (UTC) reply

     Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Ingenuity (expires 00:00, 29 April 2024 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 16:50, 20 April 2024 (UTC) reply

    User:Nokia621

    Hi there! I've been here since 2018 and would like to apply as a page patroller for the first time. I'd definitely want to help with that backlog. – Nokia621 ( talk) 19:40, 20 April 2024 (UTC) reply

     Not done. Thank you for volunteering, but in reviewing your editing history I wasn't able to find sufficient experience with the deletion process or evaluating content to be comfortable granting you the permission at this point in time. I encourage you to spend some time at WP:AFD and make policy based votes to show that you're comfortable evaluating notability. Alternatively, you can still apply to help out at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation. Hey man im josh ( talk) 16:29, 23 April 2024 (UTC) reply

    User:Melmann

    Hi. I generally rotate between different maintenance activities such as RC patrol, pending changes patrol, and edit request patrol, and would like to contribute to the NPP/AFC queues too. Editing Wikipedia for 15 years, but with long bouts of low activity or inactivity, but I feel I have a strong grasp on the core policies (especially copyright-related). Despite focusing on maintenance mainly, I have created/significantly contributed to few articles, most recently XZ Utils backdoor ( permalink when moved from draft to mainspace) and BG3. Thanks for your time. Melmann 22:09, 21 April 2024 (UTC) reply

    User:Kp2016rockin

    I've been editing pages since 2019 and was initially a trial user. Would like to try to clear up the backlog, especially for WP:AfC. I've read the guidelines. kpgamingz ( rant me) 23:06, 21 April 2024 (UTC) reply

     Not done. Thank you for volunteering, but in reviewing your editing history I wasn't able to find sufficient experience with the deletion process to feel comfortable granting you the permission at this point in time. I encourage you to spend some time at WP:AFD and make policy based votes to show that you're comfortable evaluating notability. Alternatively, you can still apply to help out at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation. Hey man im josh ( talk) 16:36, 23 April 2024 (UTC) reply

    User:SheriffIsInTown

    I regularly create pages and want to save others time from reveiwing pages created by me, in addition to that I would be able to help with the backlog. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 00:22, 22 April 2024 (UTC) reply

    @ SheriffIsInTown: To be clear, the NPR permission does not assist with review of your own pages. If you want to "save others time from reviewing pages created by me", then you would want to request autopatrolled at WP:PERM/AP. Hey man im josh ( talk) 16:39, 23 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    I will still want new page reviewers rights so I can possibly help with the backlog. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 16:48, 23 April 2024 (UTC) reply

    User:Викидим

    My temporary permission will expire soon. I am hereby requesting a permanent one. Викидим ( talk) 20:52, 22 April 2024 (UTC) reply

     Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Novem Linguae (expires 00:00, 6 May 2024 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 21:00, 22 April 2024 (UTC) reply
     Done Hey man im josh ( talk) 15:48, 23 April 2024 (UTC) reply

    Page mover


    User:Dxneo

    Hello sysops, I am here again (and again) regarding the same problem. As an autoreviewed user, it's really bothersome to have to request for the round-robin swap whenever I stubble across a redirect, and leaving a redirect when moving pages to draftspace. I was okay with requesting the swap but then I'd have to wait for someone to review the article. I am definitely not gonna lie and say I heavily work on WP:RM cause I hardly visit the place, but as an editor who's constantly creating (music related) articles this is draining. dxneo ( talk) 01:12, 22 April 2024 (UTC) reply

     Done, noting that this was removed by request about a year ago. Primefac ( talk) 07:36, 22 April 2024 (UTC) reply


    Pending changes reviewer

    User:2003 LN6

    I have recently received rollback rights a few weeks ago, and I would like to request for pending changes reviewer because I believe that I would be good at reviewing pending changes. With around four months of experience patrolling RecentChanges and fulfilling all of the criteria, I believe that I am a good candidate for this right. Thank you. 2003 LN 6 16:19, 24 April 2024 (UTC) reply



    Rollback

    User:MuffinHunter0

    I've been patrolling Recent Changes for around a month or so, reverting any vandalism I come across, while also warning/notifying other users about their edits and why it was reverted. Having rollback would allow me to use AntiVandal, which is quite faster in reverting vandalism than RedWarn(the script I am using currently), while also allow quickly rollback edits without having to add a reason. That helps me deal with the edit and move onto other vandalism on the RC list. Some more info that you may want is that I have no warnings, no instances of edit-warring, joined 3/12/2024, which was around 36 days ago, and a near, if not perfect, track record in notifying users. Thanks - Muffin(Spreading Democracy, one edit at a time) 19:56, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply

     Done Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 18:23, 22 April 2024 (UTC) reply

    User:ElENdElA

    To continue patrolling recent changes with semi-automated tools. ElENdElA ( talk) 18:16, 22 April 2024 (UTC) reply

     Done Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 18:28, 22 April 2024 (UTC) reply

    User:SafariScribe

    Hi and thanks for looking. I'do love to volunteer in patrolling recent changes as well as other aspect of vandalism. My previous request was followed by my bad in lacking civility over IPs, which Dan Cherek advised me. For atleast close/a month, I've taken the advice and sometimes instead of warning, I write messages to the editor in question. I'm not perfect but will do my best in patrolling Special:RecentChanges. I have maintained at least in a good capability, a track record of consistently notifying editors after reverting. Thanks for considering me also.—  Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 11:30, 24 April 2024 (UTC) reply

     Done Malinaccier ( talk) 15:48, 24 April 2024 (UTC) reply

    Template editor

    User:Nihonjoe

    I regularly edit templates while working on various articles on my watchlist, or when creating new articles that are part of something covered by a template. ··· 日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 17:26, 15 April 2024 (UTC) reply

     Automated comment This user has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days ( [1]). MusikBot talk 17:30, 15 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    Only because it was part of the admin package. ··· 日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 17:33, 15 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    I don't think this should be controversial, but pinging JJMC89 for comment as they removed this permission earlier today — Martin ( MSGJ ·  talk) 17:57, 15 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    Please run through WP:TPEGRANT 5 and 6. I'm not seeing the need based on their recent template edits. —  JJMC89( T· C) 18:16, 15 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    If you are willing to grant it it to me, fine. If not, fine. It's not worth my time to argue with you. ··· 日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 19:01, 15 April 2024 (UTC) reply
     Not done per JJMC89. - Fastily 03:54, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    I don't understand this decision. The user easily meets criterion 5. There is nothing in the guideline that says the edits need to be "recent". I don't see how criterion 6 can apply because an admin would not usually be requesting edits to template-protected templates? — Martin ( MSGJ ·  talk) 08:30, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    Perhaps you would be willing to discuss your decision, or would you mind if I overturned it? — Martin ( MSGJ ·  talk) 21:31, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    I agree with JJMC89. Rights are assigned on as-needed basis. Given that OP's admin/crat bits were just revoked for cause, I think it's completely appropriate to be discerning here - Fastily 03:53, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    The other interpretation of the ArbCom case is that the community has trusted Nihonjoe to, among other things, edit high-risk templates and the reason for desysopping gives us no reason to think Nihonjoe has lost that trust. Undecided on this request myself, but the alternate perspective shouldn't be ignored entirely. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:18, 20 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    Before I stick my neck out any further, Nihonjoe can you tell me if and how you are actually planning on using this userright if granted? — Martin ( MSGJ ·  talk) 09:12, 21 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    I've edited many different templates, and even created a bunch of them. I know some of the templates I've edited have been protected, so this right would be used to edit them when necessary. I understand being cautious, but I don't plan on doing anything controversial or against policy with this right. I'm always very cautious when making any template edit, whether the template is protected or not, because such edits have the potential to affect many articles all at once. ··· 日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 06:56, 22 April 2024 (UTC) reply
     Done Cabayi ( talk) 10:35, 22 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    Joe's competence in editing templates, and his caution in making (or not making) breaking changes was not a factor in his desysop. Let's not add unnecessary grief to the situation. Cabayi ( talk) 10:37, 22 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    I've been watching what's happened recently and believe that people have been unduly ostracizing Joe. Even though I recommended the removal of 'crat and sysop, I had no issue with the rights he gave himself. Considering the arbitration committee was aware of this fact (per an arbitrator comment at the proposed decision) and didn't take action simply proves my point. Joe lost the trust of the community to be a 'crat and sysop but the same can't be said for the usage of these other rights. The removal of these rights shouldn't have occurred in the first place since there wasn't a breach of trust related to their usage. If the committee had an issue with Joe granting himself these rights, they surely would have acted before closing the case. Noah, AA Talk 18:31, 22 April 2024 (UTC) reply

    User:Grufo

    Hi. I am the creator of Module:Params. Recently the module's permissions have been changed to “Require template editor access”, which means that I no longer have the rights to improve the module and add features to it, or – most importantly – fix possible bugs. Being able to continue working on Module:Params is the reason for which I request template editor rights. -- Grufo ( talk) 11:03, 21 April 2024 (UTC) Grufo ( talk) 11:03, 21 April 2024 (UTC) reply

     On hold reviewing ((c.f. Module_talk:Params#growth_and_sandboxes. — xaosflux Talk 13:29, 22 April 2024 (UTC) reply
     Not done primary concern has been addressed at Module talk:Params. — xaosflux Talk 14:22, 22 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    All good then, thank you. Somehow I have the feeling that I will have to be back here at some point in the future for the same reason… Well… See you again when that happens ;) -- Grufo ( talk) 14:27, 22 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    Certainly this is without prejudice for a future use-case. — xaosflux Talk 14:58, 22 April 2024 (UTC) reply