The article was kept by Nikkimaria via FACBot ( talk) 0:46, 15 May 2015 (UTC) [1].
I am nominating this featured article for review because there are whole sections not sourced: Track listing, all but 2 on Personnel are unsourced. There are unreliable sources: IMDb, and techdirt; and sources not formatted correctly. LADY LOTUS • TALK 11:35, 9 April 2015 (UTC) reply
Placing this on hold to allow talk-page step to occur. Nikkimaria ( talk) 15:25, 9 April 2015 (UTC) reply
Off hold. Nikkimaria ( talk) 22:04, 30 April 2015 (UTC) reply
References
Status: I have fixed various issues with broken links and out-of-date information in the article, plus done some random editing. Hopefully everyone's concerns have been addressed. Lady Lotus, it would be nice to get an update from you regarding your satisfaction with the article's current state. -- Laser brain (talk) 17:21, 5 May 2015 (UTC) reply
Since the original nominator is gone, who is keeping this watchlisted, so we don't end up right back here next year? SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 18:33, 5 May 2015 (UTC) reply
The article was kept by Nikkimaria 12:46, 9 May 2015 (UTC) reply
Notified: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ice Hockey, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject New Jersey, User talk:Sportskido8
The article was promoted in November 2006 and has not been kept up to featured article standards. I'll outline below some specific issues, but overall there are a lot of citation issues, dead links, and prose problems.
I don't believe this article would even pass a good article nomination in its' current state. A lot of work needs to be done here. Gloss 00:34, 11 January 2015 (UTC) reply
Image review. I have nominated File:KovalchuckMapleLeafs.png for deletion. The others seem OK. DrKiernan ( talk) 20:00, 1 February 2015 (UTC) reply
It looks grand to me. @ Gloss: the nominator. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 22:47, 1 May 2015 (UTC) reply
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot ( talk) 1:11, 30 May 2015 (UTC) [3].
This is a 2006 promotion with numerous issues noted on talk over a long period of time. These include biomedical claims that need MEDRS-compliant sources. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 23:00, 21 April 2015 (UTC) reply
PMID 25072266 could be addressed for comprehensiveness. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 13:21, 22 April 2015 (UTC) reply
PMID 23538079 needs to be examined for MEDRS. Adverse effects per PMID 23472485 should be discussed. PMID 22432635 and PMID 23971874 are not used.There are numerous harv ref errors, so it's unclear which sources are being used without checking one by one. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 13:41, 22 April 2015 (UTC) reply
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot ( talk) 1:12, 30 May 2015 (UTC) [4].
This is a 2006 promotion that has taken on some uncited text, unaddressed since talk notification. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 22:56, 21 April 2015 (UTC) reply
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot ( talk) 1:12, 30 May 2015 (UTC) [5].
This is a 2006 promotion that has not been maintained to FA standards; see talk page notice from March 2015. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 21:47, 14 April 2015 (UTC) reply
No edits yet. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 21:20, 27 April 2015 (UTC) reply
Still needing citation. Mav, I'm confused about this article organization:
Can that be instead:
Move to FARC to keep process on track; work still to be done, no recent work. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 13:31, 7 May 2015 (UTC) reply
Mav has not edited since April 28. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 00:45, 17 May 2015 (UTC) reply
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot ( talk) 1:12, 30 May 2015 (UTC) [6].
This is a 2006 promotion that has not been maintained to FA standards; see talk page notice March 2015. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 21:49, 14 April 2015 (UTC) reply
Comment not relevant to WP:WIAFA moved to talk. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 18:19, 16 April 2015 (UTC) reply
@ WP:FAR coordinators: because the original nominator seems concerned that I may be expressing personal preference, additional commentary from someone other than MOI on issues or deficiencies in this article might be helpful. There is a lengthy section on article talk. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 14:26, 17 April 2015 (UTC) reply
Move to FARC, at the two-week mark, there has been some improvement, but in spite of walls of text on the talk page outlining the problems with MOS, prose, citations, and comprehensiveness, the substantive issues have not been addressed, and some unwillingness to address those issues is apparent. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 21:19, 27 April 2015 (UTC) reply
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot ( talk) 0:56, 15 May 2015 (UTC) [7].
This is a 2006 promotion that has not been maintained to standards; see talk page notice from March 2015. There are problems beyond the lack of citations, which I will list if someone engages to improve the article. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 18:40, 4 April 2015 (UTC) reply
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot ( talk) 2:45, 9 May 2015 (UTC) [8].
I am nominating this featured article for review because it is currently in nine clean up categories: Articles needing additional references (January 2015), Pages with citations having bare URLs, Pages with citations lacking titles, Articles lacking reliable references (January 2015), Articles with unsourced statements (January 2015), Articles that may contain original research (October 2014), Wikipedia articles needing factual verification (October 2014, January 2015), Articles with failed verification (January 2015). DrKiernan ( talk) 07:46, 8 March 2015 (UTC) reply
Comments Having worked on the article for a couple of days now, I've realised that its problems run very deep.
Keeping this at FA standard will require more of a rewrite-from-the-ground-up effort than merely finding some missing sources. OK Computer should be a good model.— indopug ( talk) 06:42, 12 March 2015 (UTC) reply
Update: Popcornduff did an excellent job rewriting the Release section and seems to have more work lined up. I myself want to concentrate on The Communist Manifesto till 14 April (when the WP:Core Contest ends), but will try to chip in with copyedits etc after that.— indopug ( talk) 10:25, 25 March 2015 (UTC) reply
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot ( talk) 2:45, 9 May 2015 (UTC) [9].
This is a 2006 promotion that has not been kept at standard; see the talk page note from Jan 2015. There is uncited text (some without attribution and amounting to hagiography) and a MOS tune-up is needed. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 13:08, 21 March 2015 (UTC) reply
The article was delisted by DrKiernan via FACBot ( talk) 0:12, 11 May 2015 (UTC) [10].
I am nominating this featured article for review because: 1. There's a lot uncited sentences; 2. The lead is too short, doesn't covered even half of the article. Promoted December 14, 2006, talk page notice March 2. Nominator still very active, notefied. Jarodalien ( talk) 00:56, 10 April 2015 (UTC) reply