I noticed that a message you recently left to a newcomer may have been unduly harsh. Please remember not to bite the newcomers. If you see others making a common mistake, consider politely pointing out what they did wrong and showing them how to correct it. It takes more time, but it helps us retain new editors. Thank you.

Exsqueeze me? This "newcomer" was actually a sock puppet of a known vandal who was impersonating an administrator. I realize two wrongs don't make a right, but still. - Jasonbres ( talk) 04:44, 21 February 2019 (UTC) reply

Dear Jasonbres: welcome to Wikipedia, a free and open-content encyclopedia. I hope you enjoy contributing. To help get you settled in, I thought you might find the following pages useful:

• Wikipedia:Introduction
• Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• Frequently Asked Questions
  • How do you edit a page?
  • How do you revert to a previous version of a page?
  • What about copyrights?
• Community Portal

Don't worry too much about being perfect. Very few of us are! Just in case you are not perfect, click here to see how you can avoid making common mistakes.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user talk (discussion) page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. A third option is to ask a more experienced user such as an administrator.

One last bit of advice: please sign any discussion comment with four tildes (~~~~). The software will automatically convert this into your signature which can be altered in the "Preferences" tab at the top of the screen. I hope I have not overwhelmed you with information. If you need any help just let me know. Once again welcome to Wikipedia, and don't forget to tell us about yourself and be BOLD!   -- SatyrTN ( talk | contribs) 01:22, 17 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Jason: I've removed the "alternate future" occupations you added to several character infoboxes for Heroes. This sort of information isn't really needed in the 'box, especially since we have no idea how "stable" the possible futures are. If group consensus is in favour of such a change, I won't object, but I think you should probably discuss it first. Thoughts? -- Ckatz ^chat _spy 21:04, 30 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Pushing Daisies logo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:11, 26 May 2007 (UTC) reply

Do not create new articles about television episodes unless you can assert notability through reliable sources. There is no getting around it. TTN 19:04, 16 October 2007 (UTC) reply

If you disagree with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines then I suggest you go to the talk pages of those guidelines. -- Ned Scott 01:14, 3 November 2007 (UTC) reply

All of the character articles and episode articles (except for the first episode) have been nominated for deletion. The discussion is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Misc Pushing Daisies articles. -- Ned Scott 02:11, 3 November 2007 (UTC) reply

Thats what fans call it and the creator never said the "Pushing Daisies time." Obviously it is the Pushing Daisies time. Daisyverse is just a more specific word that fans call it. Look at the pushing daisies talk page.-- Mugatu3333 ( talk) 19:02, 21 January 2008 (UTC) reply

We seriously need to do something about this guy and his dumb edits.--Hailey 02:41, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Which "guy" and "edits" are you referring to? -- Jasonbres ( talk)

User:66.245.195.50, the "Cartoon All-Stars 2000s" guy!--Hailey 03:05, 7 March 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hailey C. Shannon ( talk • contribs)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information about living persons, especially if controversial, to any page on Wikipedia, as you did to Saturday Night Live season 33. Ward3001 ( talk) 04:51, 16 March 2008 (UTC) reply

On another topic, you really shouldn't have removed the sketches. ---- DanTD ( talk) 16:38, 16 March 2008 (UTC) reply

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Lindsay Lohan. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ward3001 ( talk) 19:11, 3 May 2008 (UTC) reply

I added the material about the title reference back. I don't think your comment

You know what? I don't think we should assume what the title is referring to until we listen to the commentary on the DVD.

makes much sense; (1) what's known publicly about the plot makes it completely obvious that the Othello reference is intentional; (2) the inference that the 1955 film is also being referenced is no less conjectural than a dozen similar statements made about other episode titles; and (3) the notion that we must wait for a DVD commentary to divine the intention of a title seems to me to defy common sense. Let me know if and why you disagree.

Randompeeler ( talk) 04:05, 20 May 2008 (UTC) reply

This is a free image under Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code. The work is in the public domain because it is a work of the United States Federal Government. (taken by a federal gov. employee for federal government buisness). The image comes directly from the White House's website. Nrswanson ( talk) 18:37, 27 June 2008 (UTC) reply

Stop pestering me I can put anything I want on the page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.47.88.195 ( talk) 09:57, 16 July 2008 (UTC) reply

No you can't. That's called vandalism, stupid. - Jasonbres ( talk) 13:50, 17 July 2008 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked for a period of 24 hours for edit warring on Saturday Night Live (Season 34). It is essential that you are more careful to discuss controversial changes with the user in question, rather than simply revert them repeatedly: this applies even if you think or know you are correct. Edit warring helps nobody, and actually harms the page in question, and the encyclopedia. To contest this block please place {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Tiptoety ^talk 22:59, 11 September 2008 (UTC) reply

FYI, the standard format for listing stars is alphabetical. Please don't just revert against this long-standing custom; if you do not agree with it, the better option is to open a discussion through the television project. Thanks. -- Ckatz ^chat _spy 08:13, 14 September 2008 (UTC) reply

But everyone's going to think that Kristin is the star if it's written that way. Look at the credits to Ugly Betty, Futurama, and The Simpsons. Also look at the film credits. Those things have very clear cut stars as well. - Jasonbres ( talk) 14:07, 14 September 2008 (UTC) reply

I apologise for butting in, but putting them in alphabetical order is just ridiculous. It should be kept in the way they appear in the opening credits, and I am not aware of any other show on wikipedia that has its cast displayed in alphabetical order. - Loveem 16:22, 22 September 2008 (BST)

Be careful with the name-calling as you did here. Just a friendly reminder. I also happen to agree with Levineps adding Affleck's parody of Keith Olbermann. Please read the edit again; it doesn't say that Affleck hosted the show. If it had said that I would agree with you. Thanks. Ward3001 ( talk) 15:20, 4 November 2008 (UTC) reply

Do you have a reliable cite for a new album you can add to the article? Barring one, or a reply here, we'll have to remove it until such arrives. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 04:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC) reply

And you do. I just got to you before you got to it. Sorry! — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 04:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC) reply

Are you going to build an album page at this time, or wait for more information? I'll be more than happy to create it, either in the articlespace or my userspace (is there isn't enough info yet). Say? — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 04:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC) reply

I'd rather wait for more info, including the track listing. - Jasonbres ( talk) 04:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC) reply

That's fine with me. In the interim (probably tomorrow), I'll store a work-in-progress at User:pd_THOR/Bo Burnham (album). — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 04:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC) reply

Hello Mate

Can you please stop including spoiler information in the cast list. You seem to have a strange idea of what a spoiler is. It means it gives away information that is not immediately obvious to a new viewer to the series. Obviously if you have watched all the episodes then it is not a spoiler. But, in that case, what would be? Ask yourself: do you think it is reasonable that somebody, after watching the 1st episode of pushing daisies, is told that Lily is Chuck's aunt? If not, then do not put it in the cast list. If you don't agree with this then please post your reasoning on the discussion page before reverting. Thank you

I listed Lily as Vivian's sister. Are you satisfied? - Jasonbres ( talk) 22:26, 3 February 2009 (UTC) reply

Hi there. Please do not remove information like you did with this edit just because you think it spoils the plot. Wikipedia has a strict guideline for these things, see Wikipedia:Spoiler. It does not matter, if the movie has been released already, just if the information is verifiable. You might not know this, but the movie has been leaked on the internet and while I personally did not download it, it is safe to assume that many many people did so and thus already have access to information you do not possess. Also, you need to consider that movies are given out in advance to journalists and magazines, just check how many reports on the movie's plot already exist at Google News. IGN for example is a reliable source. So please refrain from removing information that might spoil the plot - Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a TV guide, our goal is completeness of information. Regards So Why 15:09, 13 February 2009 (UTC) reply

Please quit editing this information on his page, his show's page, or the page on prop comedy. Demetri Martin uses props in many of his stand up routines. This doesn't mean that is all he does, but her certainly uses props more than standard stand-up comedians. Describing him as a stand up and prop comedian does nothing to take away from any of the three articles. As a matter of fact, it only adds to them. Please quit editing the pages just because you do not believe it belongs there. When Demetri Martin stops using props in his comedy, maybe it would make sense to remove that information. FreddyPickle ( talk) 23:23, 26 February 2009 (UTC) reply

Since when? I've only seen him use drawings and musical instruments, but those aren't really props. Plus, Demetri has never once labelled himself as a prop comic. Carrot Top on the other hand IS definitely a prop comic. And a very s****y one at that, too. - Jasonbres ( talk) 23:36, 26 February 2009 (UTC) reply

The pen, the pad, the bottles, the instruments.....these are all props. As I stated above, he may not use as many props as Carrot Top or Gallagher, but he certainly uses more props than Sam Kennison, Artie Lange, Jerry Seinfeld or Tracy Morgan. One term is not exclusive to the other. He can be both a stand up and a prop comedian. Steve Martin is a good example of this. FreddyPickle ( talk) 03:06, 27 February 2009 (UTC) reply

Your edit summary here really isn't appropriate at all. Your edit is correct (because adding the date is original research), but I would except better conduct from a longer term editor such as yourself. Please remember to assume good faith, and not bite the newbies. Prodego ^talk 04:19, 6 March 2009 (UTC) reply

Looking at some of your other edit summaries, there are quite a few other issues going on, which I will try to address concisely:

• (Nuh-uhh-uhh, no spoily-woilys.)

"It is not acceptable to delete information from an article because you think it spoils the plot" ^[1]

• Undid revision 274604156 by 164.107.143.110 (talk) GO FUCK YOURSELF!

Obviously totally unacceptable under WP:AGF, WP:BITE, WP:NPA...

• No need for wikilinking coz they don't have articles.

"In general, red links should not be removed from articles if they link to something that could plausibly sustain an article." ^[2]

Please make sure you actually understand what you are doing before undoing others edits. It makes things difficult for everyone. If you aren't sure about something, ask for outside input, perhaps on a talk page, don't just act. Prodego ^talk 04:44, 6 March 2009 (UTC) reply

You're a regular here and fine as an editor, so this is not a criticism, just a friendly reminder. It's true that a warrant was issued for her, but remember that " the threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth". It needs a reliable source. Thanks. Ward3001 ( talk) 01:38, 15 March 2009 (UTC) reply

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Ocean's Three and a Half. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Cirt ( talk) 00:19, 7 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Phoenix (band) is French, although I agree it is not notable. Ward3001 ( talk) 18:28, 9 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Okay. - Jasonbres ( talk) 18:29, 9 April 2009 (UTC) reply

FoxFlash is often innacurate (e.g., in several releases they tend to say "Lila" rather than "Tabitha") whenever revealing new information about a series or episode. So your saying that your YouTube video and your source is (somehow) more correct than my YouTube video and my source. Please explain your rational - Arnett himself says here "Ennis rhymes with a male body part". I saw a YouTube video as well saying Happy's name is spelt with two "m"s - plus, how they pronounced it at the 09' WonderCon. Your not making sense. But you still seem to think that your right with everything. Please explain. -- A ^talk/ _contribs 21:33, 13 April 2009 (UTC) reply

On second thought, nevermind. I see that the video you've cited is a more recent one, unlike the one I watched. I hadn't even bothered to look at the source you've added. My sincere apologies. -- A ^talk/ _contribs 21:37, 13 April 2009 (UTC) reply

It's okay, we all make mistakes. - Jasonbres ( talk) 21:39, 13 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to Pushing Daisies. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed even if some believe it to be contentious. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. You also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. Thank you. Also, please see Wikipedia:Spoiler for policy reasons why your edits have been reverted. TheRealFennShysa ( talk) 16:30, 13 May 2009 (UTC) reply

What am I supposed to do then? I'm in a no-win situation here! - Jasonbres ( talk) 21:05, 13 May 2009 (UTC) reply

Template:Family Guy Star Wars has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. KMFDM FAN ^{( talk!)} 09:52, 21 June 2009 (UTC) reply

I was trying to figure out the right deletion format to use. KMFDM FAN ^{( talk!)} 09:54, 21 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Hello Jason. I'd like to say I'm sorry. I know we have had our editing disagreements in the past and I wanted to apologize. I realize now that we're both just attempting to better the quality of Wikipedia. I'd also like to thank you for both watching and changing the List of Seth MacFarlane's Cavalcade of Cartoon Comedy episodes page to correctly fit with the MOS. Once again, I apologize and thank you. I hope we can continue to work together in the future. Happy editing. -- H E L LØ Ŧ H E R E 01:01, 2 July 2009 (UTC) reply

Unless the divorce has been finalized, Jon and Kate Gosselin are still married and cannot have any denotation of divorced or "ex" in the articles. Once the divorce has officially gone through, then it can be changed. Thanks. -- 13 ² 19:02, 5 August 2009 (UTC) reply

Mentioning this as I see it has been brought up before on your talk page - please use edit summaries for their intended purpose. Summaries such as [1] are unhelpful and far from civil. Thanks. Frickative 18:13, 1 October 2009 (UTC) reply

My apologies. I just get so sick and tired of people spelling her name wrong. - Jasonbres ( talk) 18:38, 1 October 2009 (UTC) reply

Thanks. Apologies too for spelling it wrong in the first place. I'll copy-edit more carefully in future. While I'm here, I've been meaning to say for a while, great work on maintaining all the Glee articles :) Frickative 19:07, 1 October 2009 (UTC) reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sit Down Shut Up logo 2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Skier Dude ( talk) 06:08, 11 November 2009 (UTC) reply

Hey JasonBres! I was just wondering if you've noticed what is going on with the page for the new series of SNL ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturday_Night_Live_(season_35)). A user named Compfunk has deleted all the notes next to the list of episodes, but only that page and not the previous seasons. He does not think it is necessary. He seems to have strong reservations. What are your thoughts. Could you look at the page and his edits and maybe discuss it with him? 65.92.21.111 ( talk) 20:28, 4 December 2009 (UTC)SAMUSEK2 reply

A proposal has been created for WikiProject Saturday Night Live. Please leave comments, and consider joining as a potential project member. Mainly.generic ( talk) 13:52, 15 December 2009 (UTC) reply

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is From Bed to Worse. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and " What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/From Bed to Worse. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 01:10, 19 December 2009 (UTC) reply

Please do not just copy and paste plot summaries from Fox. It is a copyright violation. Thank you, CTJF83 chat 22:10, 11 January 2010 (UTC) reply

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. The leftorium 20:26, 22 February 2010 (UTC) reply

You completely reverted my edit to Loretta Brown. I made numerous grammatical corrections that were necassary. I’m hoping that wasn’t your intention. Please be more careful next time. If there’s something I’m missing, feel free to let me know here. Thank you. Geeky Randy ( talk) 05:10, 13 April 2010 (UTC) reply

That's not Loretta. It's just some random black girl with a similar hairstyle. - Jasonbres ( talk) 13:07, 13 April 2010 (UTC) reply

Again, feel free to reply to my talk page since there might be a chance I won't get your reply when you respond on your talk page. Please refer to WP:CK for the disagreement and WP:NEU might be beneficial too. I'm allowing one week for a citation that it is Loretta, and if no verifiable source(s) surface that say it is her, it'll be taken down and not put back up. Unless you can find a screen shot to prove it's not her or some other kind of verifiable source, then you can hang tight for a week until I can verify it. In accordance with WP:Citation needed, we can allow a window of time for this to be proven/disproven—and in this case it's relevant because cartoons do have these kind of continuity errors. An example would be Francis Griffin and Sarah Bennett (from " I Am Peter, Hear Me Roar") both appear in " Perfect Castaway" as background characters with no lines, despite already being established characters in episodes prior. You can also see Larry Burns from The Simpsons for an example on another show. Also, there seems to be no proof that the events in " April in Quahog" immediately follow " Gone With the Wind". Thank you for not completely reverting my edit like last time. Geeky Randy ( talk) 01:30, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply

You'll be happy to know I've confirmed something you've edited as correct; when you posted that the U2 version of One was used in Laryngitis, and someone later removed that information (prompting you to remove it from the episode page, I'm sure), I went today to confirm it a week to the episode's air date. I located this confirming it. It's another Wiki, so I've made a point to presume that the other Wiki (dedicated to Glee, interestingly) has researched this and if a better source is needed someone else will provide it...so thanks for that edit and I will now defend it myself. =) CycloneGU ( talk) 13:03, 4 May 2010 (UTC) reply

Hi Cyclone, (and Jason, I hope you don't mine me replying on your talk page - apologies if so!) thank you for trying to source the information. If you look at the reliable source and verifiability guidelines, however, they both note that open wikis like the Glee Wikia are considered self-published sources that shouldn't be used on Wikipedia. From my experience, the standards external wikis use for inclusion are usually far less stringent than Wikipedia itself, and they often include speculation and outright rumour. It may well transpire in the end that it is the U2 version they're performing, and that's fine, but we can't say so until we have a suitably reliable source confirming it. The most recent reliable source I've found discussing it is this one, which notes that five days ago, no one connected with the show would give an official comment on whether it's the U2 version or not. So we really need something more solid than the word of a fansite wiki to counter that. Frickative 13:56, 4 May 2010 (UTC) reply

Frickative, I've placed a note on your talk page. I've changed my source to the FOX site specifically; echoing my remark at your page, it's hilarious that the only thing we're disagreeing about is who wrote and sang ONE song. *LOL* CycloneGU ( talk) 14:20, 4 May 2010 (UTC) reply

[Outdent] You might be interested in the discussion here, particularly the latter part.

Since it sounds like you haven't visited my talk page yet - where I specifically talk about the Glee Music confirmation, and it's also here...

I contacted FOX by e-mail yesterday directly from the main Web page (basically I went to www.fox.com) and inquired about it. While the second message was a little bit on the rude side in terms of how it came across (whether intended or not, but what do I know since FOX News is itself rude and unbalanced), a specific quote from the reply in question was, "The U2-written song was covered" (yes, they bolded it). I don't care whether they publish it or not; this is a good enough confirmation for me since we can't use Wikis as sources for obvious reasons. We just don't have a good way of verifying personal research on Wikipedia.

If you are still not satisfied with this explanation, I challenge you to use the Ask FOX feature and get the same confirmation. CycloneGU ( talk) 15:48, 5 May 2010 (UTC) reply

I forgot to sign my last comment, so I've put a sig on it based on my edit time.

I noticed the last edit and I agree my detail addon was unneeded there, so I won't challenge that removal. It just seemed silly to me that in the week preceeding a show that was taped over two months ago, we were challenging every source out there because the newspapers and reporters never cover this thing. *LOL* I had a discussion at length about "The Lady Is A Tramp" with Frickative as well since there are other versions of that not noted as covers...but I did not challenge the information specifically because (a) they are likely covers NEway, (b) the show uses show tunes frequently. No offense was meant in any of this, BTW, and thanks for doing the second step that I did as well. =) CycloneGU ( talk) 23:51, 6 May 2010 (UTC) reply

I have nominated The other guy from Wham (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. ~ Amory ( u • t • c) 02:01, 5 May 2010 (UTC) reply

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Krusty Gets Kancelled. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- Cirt ( talk) 18:41, 9 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Hi. Can you please tell me how adding that "Grilled Cheesus" is a religion-based episode is considered too much information? If you take a look at featured article Glee (season 1), you will see that the episode summary contain much, much more information than any of the ones in Glee (season 2). Thank you. Yvesnimmo ( talk) 00:16, 20 September 2010 (UTC) reply

It just makes the synopsis way too long. - Jasonbres ( talk) 00:24, 20 September 2010 (UTC) reply

Clearly not, if the Glee (season 1) article has passed rigorous reviewing to become an example of one of the best works on the English Wikipedia. I don't know of any rule that defines "too long" for episode summaries, or prohibits them. Yvesnimmo ( talk) 00:26, 20 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The relevant guideline here is WP:MOSTV, which states that plot summaries in tables should be 100-200 words, or 350 for complicated storylines. It's currently 28 words, and was 45 - definitely not way too long. Frickative 01:05, 20 September 2010 (UTC) reply

Right. I do not think it was too long. The summary will get changed anyway—very likely completely rewritten—after the episode airs to encompass more precisely the plot of the episode, and at that point, it will be even longer. Yvesnimmo ( talk) 01:11, 20 September 2010 (UTC) reply

Please do not remove sources from articles. Sources don't expire; things like participants in an episode must be sourced. A statement of "confirmed on air" is not a source. Please read WP:Citing sources and WP:Reliable sources for additional information. Acps110 ^{( talk • contribs)} 13:02, 26 September 2010 (UTC) reply

Not if the episode already aired. Then references are no longer necessary. It's been that way for years on these SNL season pages. - Jasonbres ( talk) 16:01, 26 September 2010 (UTC) reply

That's not the way it's done on Wikipedia; WP:Verifiability! If you remove a source, anyone can remove the people from the episodes as being unsourced. Acps110 ^{( talk • contribs)} 16:10, 26 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The previous SNL seasons have no references. So do you want us to find archival evidence that THOSE hosts and musical guests appeared on the show? Of course not. It's a pain to do so. - Jasonbres ( talk) 16:31, 26 September 2010 (UTC) reply

P.S. Also, the cameos and musical performances are also unsourced. Ergo, everyone agrees that this is correct information. - Jasonbres ( talk) 16:35, 26 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The article Nick Swardson's Pretend Time has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia isn't a crystal ball.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{ dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{ dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{ Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 03:23, 8 October 2010 (UTC) reply

1. Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to List of songs in Glee (season 2). Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Yves ( talk) 15:21, 19 October 2010 (UTC) reply

   Hi there. I would like to ask you to please stop adding original research to Wikipedia like you did here; it is not allowed, as is WP:SYNTH. Thank you. Yves ( talk) 15:21, 19 October 2010 (UTC) reply

How can you possibly listen to "Sweet Transvestite" and say that's NOT Amber? - Jasonbres ( talk) 15:36, 19 October 2010 (UTC) reply

That is still original research. Maybe it is someone with a remarkably similar voice that has never been on the show before. Trust me, I have been listening to the song for a week now, and I know it is Riley, but the truth does not go on Wikipedia over verifiability. Yves ( talk) 17:32, 19 October 2010 (UTC) reply

I have reverted some of your good faith edits to List of songs in Glee (season 2): this edit is using a blog as a source and this one still doesn't mention Riley's performance of "Sweet Transvestite". It may be obvious, yes, but it does not directly state it without requiring WP:SYNTH. And what makes BroadwayWorld a reliable website? Yves ( talk) 14:40, 21 October 2010 (UTC) reply

Hi there. I would just like to remind you to read, if you haven't done so, or reread, if you have, WP:OR and WP:SYNTH. Your contributions are certainly appreciated in good faith, but unfortunately, we cannot accept either of these things on Wikipedia. Hope you understand. Yves ( talk) 03:42, 21 October 2010 (UTC) reply

I would also like to add that, when adding content, to never revert back to a previous revision if there are edits in between. Your edit, for example, reverted constructive edits like the addition a performer, the addition of a two-column reference list, and the omission of unsourced performers per a request on the talk page. Please do not add to Wikipedia like this. Thank you. Yves ( talk) 03:55, 21 October 2010 (UTC) reply

Legitimate question: do you not understand Wikipedia's policies on verification? And providing reliable sources? Yves ( talk) 01:30, 27 October 2010 (UTC) reply

It's NOT original research!! The episode already aired! THAT'S the source! - Jasonbres ( talk) 03:14, 27 October 2010 (UTC) reply

Only the primary source, which is not helpful. Yves ( talk) 18:17, 8 November 2010 (UTC) reply

Hi Jason, just alerting you to a slight problem at Glee (season 2). With this edit you've added a new title for episode 8, but seemingly forgotten to include the actual reference :) This has prompted a none too clever bot to substitute in a 1997 review of Evita?!. I've checked MSN TV but can't see the title listed there, so perhaps you'd like to add it back in with whatever source you'd found? Cheers. Frickative 14:52, 3 November 2010 (UTC) reply

ETA - just noticed that the TV Guide source previously in use has updated the page to reflect the "Furt" title, so nothing to change now! Frickative 15:03, 3 November 2010 (UTC) reply

Please check the references provided before you revert any changes, including this. An edit like that is not appreciated. If you click the link, you will see that it has indeed been released on the ninth of November. Yves ( talk) 22:57, 13 November 2010 (UTC) reply

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to List of songs in Glee (season 2). Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Yves ( talk) 22:58, 15 November 2010 (UTC) reply

I request that you please take the time and read the above article on original research and what it is. This is not an assumption of bad faith, but this has been a recurring issue, and I think you need to be aware of that to improve your skills as a Wikipedian. Thanks. Yves ( talk) 22:58, 15 November 2010 (UTC) reply

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Glee (season 2). Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Yves ( talk) 19:56, 23 November 2010 (UTC) reply

Again, please stop with the original research. Yves ( talk) 19:56, 23 November 2010 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thanks for taking the time to ensure that we have proper sources for content about Winnie the Pooh (film). However, regarding this change, you reverted a lot of valid changes as well. I assume you only meant to revert the changes to the cast list, as all the other changes look good, AFAICT. Please restore the other changes. -- Mepolypse ( talk) 20:21, 21 November 2010 (UTC) reply

Thank you, and keep up the good work. -- Mepolypse ( talk) 20:48, 21 November 2010 (UTC) reply

You're very welcome. - Jasonbres ( talk) 00:57, 22 November 2010 (UTC) reply

I know how frustrating it is to know something is right, yet not be allowed to include it in the article. Before Journey aired, I had read on blogs from people who had physically attended the taping and scanned copies of the programs they'd received. Based on those blogs, I insisted that the information was valid as they actually got the info from the event and shared it with everyone. It however was considered "original research" or "invalid source" (because it was a blog). The big one for me was knowing who all of the judges were, including Rod Remington, but it wasn't allowed to add his name to the article because it wasn't properly sourced. Of course, he appeared in the episode itself as a judge, and only then did I get to finally add it to the article and it stuck.

Similarly, I found the "Glee Volume 4" article on tommy2.net which has been very accurate with its listings for Glee. They even included the album cover! Unfortunately, tommy2.net is still marked as an invalid source and therefore the page was not created until Amazon and iTunes caught up and released pre-order pages for it. I fought for this one as well in favour of tommy2.net because of its history, but to no avail.

Just be careful to only add anything that is properly sourced. Even Jimbo Wales has an article that he and those who know him can't add certain information to, and a discussion came up once as to whether his daughter in fact existed because the source was in question. *LOL* CycloneGU ( talk) 16:34, 30 November 2010 (UTC) reply

Jasonbres, you really, really need to stop with the original research. This is becoming a regular problem with you. Yves ( talk) 19:50, 3 December 2010 (UTC) reply

I'm sorry, I accidentally changed that page but I forgot to click on preview button. I want to chat with you few moments about Amy Adams. I know she engaged Darren Le Gallo in 2001. But I forgotten that name of that guy who's married her that I have changed. Did you know what is the name of that guy have married Amy Adams that I've changed? -- AndyTheCop ( talk) 18:05, 19 January 2011 (UTC) reply

Now I remember that name, I got it, his name is Jonas Andromeda.

Maybe I thought Jonas Andromeda is a new boyfriend of Amy Adams. She engaged him on January 14, 2011. Now I know she hasn't married yet. -- AndyTheCop ( talk) 19:17, 19 January 2011 (UTC) reply

When Amy Adams engaged her new boyfriend, Jonas Andromeda on January 14, 2011, her daughter Aviana Olea Le Gallo might be renamed to Aviana Olea Andromeda. -- AndyTheCop ( talk) 20:17, 19 January 2011 (UTC) reply

Where's your source? - Jasonbres ( talk) 20:34, 19 January 2011 (UTC) reply

I'm just looking for it. -- AndyTheCop ( talk) 02:16, 20 January 2011 (UTC) reply

In other words, it's all bullshit you pulled outta your ass, right? - Jasonbres ( talk) 02:26, 20 January 2011 (UTC) reply

No. As I said I have to looking for sources. If I found that source, I will add it to that page if it's true. If I found no source, I don't add it to that page. -- AndyTheCop ( talk) 05:25, 20 January 2011 (UTC) reply

It is simply not appropriate to put dummy text relating to events that haven't occurred yet into Wikipedia articles. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz ( talk) 03:22, 6 March 2011 (UTC) reply

I've been doing it for years to save time and NOW you tell me it's a no-no?! - Jasonbres ( talk) 03:25, 6 March 2011 (UTC) reply

Good find on the Fox press release as displayed by The Futon Critic, which calls the episode "Pot of Gold". ("Pot 'O Gold" looked so wrong. It still does, for that matter.) It meant for some last-minute scrambling to fix the Did You Know? entry, which was already in the queue when you made the necessary move, but it got done in time.

Since the "Pot of Gold" article is currently a "Did You Know?" entry on the Wikipedia main page, if another even more authoritative source turns up in the next 10+ hours with yet another rendering, please hold off further renaming until the next batch of DYKs are moved to the main page; we don't want to have the article become unavailable, even temporarily, while it's being featured there. Thanks! BlueMoonset ( talk) 13:57, 16 October 2011 (UTC) reply

Jason, there is enough conflicting information out there that I thought it best to remove your inclusion of episode 8 for the time being. These include:

• the information that Morrison has said he's directing episode 8 (he said it a month ago; is it still true?)
• the information that Overstreet is returning in episode 8 (also true according to Murphy)
• the episode is still being written (again, true according to Murphy)
• Harmony reappears in episode 8, which is apparently Sectionals: "She is sort of the Rachel of her school, and she's so amazing, and she will be competing against our groups," Murphy says. (zap2it's quote, from the 300th song interviews.)
• episodes 10 and 11 will be in January, and Samuel's character will first be seen in one of them (Murphy via zap2it and others)
• the Christmas episode is being done in December (true according to Ausiello and also The Futon Critic)
• the Christmas episode is the ninth episode (true according to The Futon Critic)
• it "looks like" Morrison is directing the Christmas episode (Ausiello again)

As you can see, the first and last two simply do not add up: someone's wrong here. And if we know that we're operating on partially bad information, it seems to me best to hold off until we get something better. According to a Lea Michele tweet, they finish episode 7 this week...or were going to until Naya Rivera came down sick. So episode 8 will have to start shooting soon...

If there had been an episode title included—reliably sourced, naturally—I'd probably have left it and cut out the Christmas info, but without that and with the new uncertainty about which episode Morrison was doing, there wasn't enough meat left.

Logic tells me that it's unlikely you'd have all the Christmas songs and all the Sectionals songs in a single episode: it's just not practical, especially if you want to feature Warblers, Harmony, and New Directions: the Christmas album has 12 songs on it, and you know they're going to feature four or five minimum. However, logic has a funny way of not always applying to Glee. And, of course, if episode 9 is the Christmas one, they certainly haven't finished writing it if episode 8 is also undone. BlueMoonset ( talk) 19:22, 27 October 2011 (UTC) reply

Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Pan Am (TV series), please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. The link you added was dead and the content you added subsequently removed. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Lhb1239 ( talk) 20:16, 29 November 2011 (UTC) reply

Jasonbres, instead of a wholesale revert in " Extraordinary Merry Christmas", I should have deleted just the information that wasn't supported by the cited reference. I apologize. Thanks for restoring the Production sentence, minus Mayhew; it's important to have it. (Mayhew's living in Texas these days, according to his website, and has become a US citizen.) BlueMoonset ( talk) 02:00, 3 December 2011 (UTC) reply

It's okay. I forgive you. - Jasonbres ( talk) 02:02, 3 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Hi. When you recently edited List of Smash episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Mayer ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:47, 8 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Jason, just wanted to let you know that I reversed my reversion and let stand your addition of "2Cellos" to the guest star list for "Michael". Fox is notoriously inaccurate (they omitted Grant Gustin from the episode's guest star list!), and the Production section has from the beginning mentioned their appearance. Since Sony/Columbia is Glee's label, they may have a better insight as to whether they are indeed treated like "guest artists", which ought to translate as guest stars... but it may not.

I think, however, that we have to give TV Guide and the Hollywood Reporter more weight than Amazon on "Human Nature" / "Nature Boy" for the present. Amazon has made mistakes before on song titles, and Hollywood Reporter generally confirms scoops from other sources before repeating information such as there being a mash-up, which they do state. I'm hoping we get more definitive statements soon confirming all ten songs; I'm sure there's going to be a lot released over the next ten days... BlueMoonset ( talk) 02:55, 21 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi. When you recently edited Characters of Glee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Summer Nights ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:20, 1 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi. When you recently edited Callbacks (Smash), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page On Air with Ryan Seacrest ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:45, 11 February 2012 (UTC) reply

I know you undid this edit I made in the infobox: [2]. I don't disagree with it, since I introduced the story and teleplay infobox parameters to the article in the first place. I just added the small text mentioning the Teleplay and Television Story just to make it more clear to the other readers. Teleplay and Story credits usually aren't credited to solely one person as is the case with Theresa Rebeck with this pilot episode. The term "Television Story" is generally used when the episode writer actually adapted the show from another work. Smash is actually adapted from a book, I believe. Quasy Boy 20:23, 14 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Okay, I understand. - Jasonbres ( talk) 20:41, 14 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Check article title vs. first few words in lede. Zad68 ( talk) 18:36, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply

How embarrasing. Thanks for telling me. I fixed it. - Jasonbres ( talk) 18:38, 6 March 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi. When you recently edited Once (musical), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Carney ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:11, 11 March 2012 (UTC) reply

You deleted Blake Andrew Johnson as a recurring. Please note IMDB is a reliable source as the SMASH imdb is manitained by the show staff. Also, if you need more proof of him being on episodes 3, 6, 7 $8 as a recurring and Principal as stated on his script, see the nbc website for the show http://www.nbc.com/smash/photos/enter-mr-dimaggio/9885#item=224316 . You can also check the article in Newsday about him http://long-island.newsday.com/things-to-do/local-4-year-old-model-now-an-actor-too-1.3538441 . thank you Ltlwmn2002 ( talk) 15:02, 3 April 2012 (UTC)ltlwmn2002 reply

Hi. When you recently edited Glee (season 3), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rex Lee ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:31, 24 April 2012 (UTC) reply

On 25 April 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Saturday Night Glee-ver, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that " Saturday Night Glee-ver" is Glee's tribute to the Bee Gees and Saturday Night Fever? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Saturday Night Glee-ver.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Casliber ( talk · contribs) 08:05, 25 April 2012 (UTC) reply

On 4 May 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Choke (Glee), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that to film her role on the Glee episode " Choke", Whoopi Goldberg traveled by bus from New York to Los Angeles? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Choke (Glee).You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Panyd ^{The muffin is not subtle} 00:06, 4 May 2012 (UTC) reply

On 7 May 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Prom-asaurus, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Glee episode " Prom-asaurus" features a dinosaur-themed senior prom and the song "Dinosaur" by Kesha? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Prom-asaurus.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Panyd ^{The muffin is not subtle} 08:05, 7 May 2012 (UTC) reply

On 8 May 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Dance with Somebody (Glee), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that " Dance with Somebody", Glee's tribute episode to the late Whitney Houston, features an a cappella version of " How Will I Know"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dance with Somebody (Glee).You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Casliber ( talk · contribs) 16:03, 8 May 2012 (UTC) reply

On 11 May 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Nationals (Glee), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Lindsay Lohan is one of three celebrity judges appearing in the " Nationals" competition episode of Glee? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Nationals (Glee).You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 08:03, 11 May 2012 (UTC) reply

Hearfourmewesique ( talk) 17:52, 11 May 2012 (UTC) reply

On 17 May 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Goodbye (Glee), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Gloria Estefan's guest-starring role as the mother of Santana Lopez in the season finale of Glee was originally planned for an early 2012 episode? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Goodbye (Glee).You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Casliber ( talk · contribs) 09:03, 17 May 2012 (UTC) reply

The article The Half Hour has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't appear to meet the notability guideline for TV shows or the general notability guideline

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –  hysteria18 ( talk) 18:48, 21 May 2012 (UTC) reply

Could you provide a link proving your claim that we MUST use real words, like you stated on [[Glee (season 4}]]?. LiamNolan24 ( talk) 02:35, 8 September 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pitch Perfect, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Don't Stop the Music ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:48, 30 September 2012 (UTC) reply

Jason, I like to have Glee articles up when there's real information in them, but not when the information is not only unsourced but inaccurate. Having noticed a number of inaccuracies in the unsourced production section of " Dynamic Duets", I'm going to have to revert your second attempt to start the article. It's a shame, since the episode will air in a week, but their are certain minimal standards that need to be maintained. If the same is true of "Thanksgiving", it too will have to revert to redirect status. BlueMoonset ( talk) 06:06, 16 November 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The First Christmas: The Story of the First Christmas Snow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page White Christmas ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 17:21, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Glee, Actually ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Feliz Navidad

Thanksgiving (Glee) ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Promises, Promises

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:24, 1 December 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Crossroads Guitar Festival, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Booker T ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:23, 8 December 2012 (UTC) reply

Your source saying that Frozen will be a 2014 film is probably because they made a mistake in the release. You must think outside the box. (Thinking inside the box here would be assuming that the mention of 2014 was purposely that time in 2014; which would be almost 2015.) Georgia guy ( talk) 17:29, 29 May 2013 (UTC) reply

Can you tell me where you got the idea that Disney Channel made a mistake on the press release? Give me a source to prove this. Keenan202 ( talk) 18:47, 23 January 2014 (UTC) reply

https://twitter.com/nickandmore/status/426188049895026688 You may have noticed how the episode seems to overlap with an episode of Fish Hooks airing at the same time. - Jasonbres ( talk) 18:49, 23 January 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Frozen (2013 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Digital download ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:06, 26 February 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Jimmy Fallon sketches, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Your Body ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:53, 18 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Are you Jason Breslin from Phineas and Ferb Wiki? - EvilLair ( talk) 05:52, 21 July 2014 (UTC) reply

Yes. Yes, I am. :) - Jasonbres ( talk) 12:13, 21 July 2014 (UTC) reply

I removed it due to some-one adding a 'citation needed' next to the "Shoichet also provides the singing voice of Twilight Sparkle." part. Asaraullo05 ( talk) 03:25, 29 July 2014 (UTC) reply

I would like to tell you that in your contributing to Glee (season 3) and that the prom episode was called "Prom-asaurus" so that means I was right and you were wrong, saying that wasn't the episode! Entertainer91 ( talk) 01:49, 28 April 2012 (UTC) reply

Why did you erase the absent on Rainbow Rocks shorts? -- 24.170.75.206 ( talk) 01:40, 23 August 2014 (UTC) reply

Because nopony cares about that. It is unnecessary. - Jasonbres ( talk) 02:08, 24 August 2014 (UTC) reply

Why did you erase mind control? -- 24.170.75.206 ( talk) 22:10, 23 September 2014 (UTC) reply

Because they are not mind controlling. They are using the power of persuasion. Big difference! - Jasonbres ( talk) 22:14, 23 September 2014 (UTC) reply

They're like Mr. Big from WordGirl to me. -- 24.170.75.206 ( talk) 22:17, 23 September 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Simpsons Guy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Patrick Meighan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:22, 5 September 2014 (UTC) reply

There is a place for it on MLP Wikia; but sadly there's no chart like the one that was seen here on Wikipedia. Here is the link... ( http://mlp.wikia.com/wiki/My_Little_Pony_Friendship_is_Magic_Wiki:Workshop/The_Mane_Event) Prince Silversaddle ( talk) 03:30, 4 October 2014 (UTC) reply

I saw you add transcript information for Doof 101 and Tales from the Resistance on the Phineas and Ferb Wiki. Yeah, I thought the Star Wars DVD was supposed to release November 11th, not now. How do you already have it? -- EvilLair ( ✉ | c) 00:30, 31 October 2014 (UTC) reply

I saw the DVD at Target yesterday and I bought it. - Jasonbres ( talk) 00:34, 31 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Thanks. -- EvilLair ( ✉ | c) 00:40, 31 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a " cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut-and-paste-move repair holding pen. Thank you. Jackmcbarn ( talk) 02:21, 19 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi Jasonbres, I'm inviting you to comment at this RfC about Phineas and Ferb season numbering, since I noticed that you had expressed an opinion in a discussion thread about the matter. That discussion quickly deteriorated, so I opened an RfC. One user thought it necessary to start using sockpuppets to vote up his POV, which has cast some shadows on the discussion and the RfC. Anyhow, you're pretty much up to date. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 16:03, 26 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Saturday Night Live (season 40), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ready to Run. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:01, 21 December 2014 (UTC) reply

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Fat Kid from Stand By Me. Since you had some involvement with the The Fat Kid from Stand By Me redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. – Majora4 ( leave a message) 20:10, 2 January 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi Jasonbres, a quick note re: this edit at Phineas and Ferb (season 4). As you have previously been made aware, future events must be sourced per WP:CRYSTAL. Additionally, we are not allowed to copy content from another source and present it as our own, nor are we allowed to closely paraphrase it as both scenarios present copyright violation problems. The better approach is to wait until the episode airs to provide a summary, or, to take reasonable excerpts and present them as quotations, with the appropriate attribution in the form of a reference. This quotation would then have to be changed when the episode airs, because we cannot base the bulk of an article's content on excerpted, copyrighted content. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 20:46, 7 May 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Muppets (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matt Vogel. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:55, 9 July 2015 (UTC) reply

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Untitled Amy Poehler Project. Since you had some involvement with the The Untitled Amy Poehler Project redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 14:35, 22 July 2015 (UTC) reply

Hello, Jasonbres. Could you consider weighing in on this proposal at the List of Muppets discussion page? ~ Jedi94 ( Want to tell me something?) 18:33, 12 September 2015 (UTC) reply

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Francesca Capaldi#Name. Thanks. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 04:46, 8 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Saturday Night Live (season 41), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sam Smith. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:13, 15 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the The Night Before (2015 film) page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error ( help). ( Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:32, 17 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Whoever you are, I love your contributions about "Saturday Night Live". I read the Wikipedia articles all the time. I have watched that show since it first premiered. Great job, keep up the good work. Wikipedia is so lucky to have you. JGKlein JGKlein 13:59, 22 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Thank you. I'm honored. :blushes: - Jasonbres ( talk) 17:22, 22 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC) reply

You wrote on the article for The Ridiculous 6, "To no one's surprise, this film has been slammed by critics."

I don't doubt that, since the movie went straight to Netflix, but I'm sure you understand we need citations in reliable third party sources and we can't just give our own opinion. Jonathunder ( talk) 23:14, 11 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Thanks for clarifying how the cast members are credited. The place I got the episodes from apparently cuts the end credits off, and the only legitimate way available to view the episodes here is to wait until they air on the local Disney Channel. nyuszika7h ( talk) 17:20, 17 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a " cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Gial Ackbar ( talk) 18:26, 13 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt into List of Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt episodes. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{ copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa ( talk) 23:49, 13 April 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of BoJack Horseman episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mike Hollingsworth. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:32, 23 July 2016 (UTC) reply

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. ∼∼∼∼ Eric0928 Talk 22:42, 29 January 2017 (UTC) reply

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The other guy from Wham. Since you had some involvement with the The other guy from Wham redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 ( talk) 22:18, 4 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Not the White House Correspondents’ Dinner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TBS. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:49, 20 April 2017 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited (I've Had) The Time of My Life, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Larry Murphy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:26, 1 May 2017 (UTC) reply

By mistake, you pasted the ref link in edit summary. I already fixed it. :-)
Just wanted to let you know. :-) —usernamekiran (talk) 20:35, 10 May 2017 (UTC) reply

I need to ask you something,

Do you know how to add references? Austin012599 ( talk) 15:29, 10 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Will you please cut out trying to take away the reference I've been making about Joe Ballarini!

I've found a reference, and it's on Rotten Tomatoes. Why are you not content? Austin012599 ( talk) 02:58, 18 June 2017 (UTC) Austin012599 ( talk) 02:58, 18 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Because Rotten Tomatoes is more reliable for critics' scores, not film credits. - Jasonbres ( talk) 11:11, 18 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Yay. Okay then.

You know, I wish things didn't have to be so conflicting over this particular person.

I can't understand why nobody can just go to Twitter, and simply ask the writer team about Joe Ballarini with a simple push of the button. I'm sure they'd be happy to answer the question. Austin012599 ( talk) 14:45, 18 June 2017 (UTC) reply

I was basing it on how Lab Rats one hour specials work, where they have versions that are split into two parts, same with Phineas and Ferb (some Phineas hour-long episodes are on Netflix, and iTunes in France/Germany, in separate parts, forgot which ones it is as those are some of the few countries besides the US that has TV shows on iTunes). I guess we can wait to see how they'll handle this one before listing two parts for each half hour time frame. Cosmic Clone ( talk) 19:32, 26 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Thanks, I didn't know that "Celestial Advice" page was deleted. Sorry for inconvenience! Pure conSouls ( talk) 06:58, 28 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Here's the source: http://www.tvguide.com/tvshows/my-little-pony-friendship-is-magic/episode-12-season-7/discordant-harmony/307115/ - Although, we're still waiting on Discovery Family's August 2017 Programming Highlights PDF for confirmation.

Thanks for creating Rocko's Modern Life: Static Cling, Jasonbres!

Wikipedia editor Insertcleverphrasehere just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

A good start. Nice article so far.

To reply, leave a comment on Insertcleverphrasehere's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

— Insert CleverPhrase Here 02:03, 21 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Thank you very much. Looking forward to expanding it as soon as we get more info. - Jasonbres ( talk) 02:05, 21 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Join Wikipedia:WikiProject My Little Pony! ☺️ -- Eflyjason ( talk) 10:27, 11 September 2017 (UTC) reply

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Little Rocket Man. Since you had some involvement with the Little Rocket Man redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{( talk) ( contributions) ( logs)} 03:14, 12 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Thanks for creating Little Rocket Man, Jasonbres!

Wikipedia editor Chris troutman just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Clearly you put no thought into this.

To reply, leave a comment on Chris troutman's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Chris Troutman ( talk) 08:15, 12 October 2017 (UTC) reply

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic (season 8), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) ( talk • contribs) 17:50, 28 October 2017 (UTC) reply

My intention was not to vandalize. My intention was to request the article be deleted since there was not enough info. - Jasonbres ( talk) 17:54, 28 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Thank you for clarifying. My solution: just add the template without blanking the page. Blanking can be seen as vandalism to some editors. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) ( talk • contribs) 17:55, 28 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Hey, I'm not sure what's wrong with the edits I made. I realize the run time is affected by ads, which is why I put approximately. I also fail to see how I plagiarized anything... All I did was put, in my opinion, a better synopsis of the movie overall than just that it's after the show and answers questions left behind. Eternal Flame Baby ( talk) 23:53, 16 November 2017 (UTC) reply

Don't mean to come off as rude btw! Just legitimately confused. Eternal Flame Baby ( talk) 23:55, 16 November 2017 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited GEICO advertising campaigns, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page I'm with Stupid ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:18, 29 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Is San Lorenzo supposed to be in South America or Central America? I haven't seen the movie, but I read elsewhere in Wikipedia that San Lorenzo is in Central America (which is considered part of North America). Goustien ( talk) 06:30, 26 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Hi. You just removed episode information about the latest episode of DuckTales 2017, which aired on Disney XD Scandinavia (and possibly other places) Wednesday 21st March at 4PM CET, due to a lack of source. What kind of source would be acceptable to demonstrate that the episode exists and has been aired? Disney's Scandinavian webpages are ridiculously light on information, so there's no help to be found there. Reruns are scheduled every day until next Wednesday, when another new episode is scheduled. I have a full recording of the episode, but obviously I can't link to that as a reference on Wikipedia. Would a screengrab of the title card do? https://twitter.com/trondmm/status/976478065630031877 TrondM ( talk) 10:06, 23 March 2018 (UTC) reply

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 06:17, 4 May 2018 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Darkwing Duck characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Keith Ferguson ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 11:19, 12 May 2018 (UTC) reply

Done. - Jasonbres ( talk) 16:34, 12 May 2018 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Whiskey Tango Foxtrot (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WTF ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:17, 19 May 2018 (UTC) reply

What are you doing with this? Natureium ( talk) 02:35, 21 November 2018 (UTC) reply

I know. It's stupid. Hence why I immediately undid it. - Jasonbres ( talk) 02:36, 21 November 2018 (UTC) reply

That page has 223 watchers. You might want to pick a less popular page to vandalize. Natureium ( talk) 02:37, 21 November 2018 (UTC) reply

Why do you guys keep vandalizing the cast? It's on IMDb. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Man from Snowy River ( talk • contribs) 03:43, 7 January 2019 (UTC) reply

I'm not vandalizing it. I only noted that one actor was listed twice in the cast list. - Jasonbres ( talk) 03:45, 7 January 2019 (UTC) reply

Then why is it removed?

To avoid duplicates. (Duh!) He was already listed twice. - Jasonbres ( talk) 03:49, 7 January 2019 (UTC) reply

Alright. I guess we'll leave it for now. Sorry for calling you a vandal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Man from Snowy River ( talk • contribs) 03:50, 7 January 2019 (UTC) reply

The Lego Movie 3 is not yet?

First of all, learn English. Second of all, you need to source your information. - Jasonbres ( talk) 03:08, 27 January 2019 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The President Wore Pearls, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Evita ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:17, 3 February 2019 (UTC) reply

You you reverted me without a comment, so I don't know why you think it was a problematic edit. It would be nice if you could explain. The sentence is just too long to be comprehensible. Breaking the sentence into a list makes it much easier to follow. Banana Republic ( talk) 04:23, 21 May 2019 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of All in the Family episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:52, 24 May 2019 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited All That (season 11), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A Quiet Place ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 14:44, 30 June 2019 (UTC) reply

Hi. I've reverted an edit of yours which reinstated info I had removed claiming it was unexplained removal of content. I'm not sure if this was a mistake or not, but my removal was perfectly explained as you can see here: I was removing content which was directly copy-and-pasted from the TVPassport website. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, so please do not reinstate the plagiarized summaries again into the article. Thank you. Katniss May the odds be ever in your favor ♥ 13:38, 25 July 2019 (UTC) reply

This is your only warning; if you add defamatory content to Wikipedia again, as you did at Chris Savino, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Amaury • 02:45, 31 July 2019 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of The Daily Show recurring segments, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gumshoe ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 08:04, 26 August 2019 (UTC) reply

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Memories (Maroon 5 song), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ss 112 18:26, 20 September 2019 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Big Mouth (TV series), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Craig Robinson and Bill Ward ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:24, 5 October 2019 (UTC) reply

Can you reverted back to my edit when the episode is done?

Here's my edit:

https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=My_Little_Pony:_Friendship_Is_Magic&oldid=920825497 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stephenfisher2001 ( talk • contribs) 23:35, 12 October 2019 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC) reply

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2020!

Hello Jasonbres, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020. Happy editing, ★Trekker ( talk) 17:00, 21 December 2019 (UTC) reply Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Drmies ( talk) 01:33, 3 January 2020 (UTC) reply

Attacking users was not my intention. If you read it that way, I apologize. I just really despise people who have nothing better to do with their time than to constantly edit war Wikipedia articles. It is unproductive and often leads to situations like this. - Jasonbres ( talk) 01:39, 3 January 2020 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Saturday Night Live at Home, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alex Moffat ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 14:55, 13 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm Magitroopa. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 74th Tony Awards, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magitroopa ( talk) 21:57, 15 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Just to let you know, Jasonbres, Viacom is now a disambiguation page. So when you link to the company, the way you did at Grease (film), please use:

[[ViacomCBS|Viacom]] or just [[ViacomCBS]]

See more about linking at the help page and the project page. Thank you for your edits and for your support in this! P.I. Ellsworth   ed.  ^put'r there 23:34, 15 May 2020 (UTC) reply

What was that for? I was trying to fix my edits into the article better. I wasn't just undoing edits for the sake of it. Mk8mlyb ( talk) 01:23, 18 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Is not a valid criteria for speedy deletion. [3] EoRdE6^{( Come Talk to Me!)} 19:12, 28 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Utkarsh Ambudkar, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 ( talk) 21:49, 6 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello, Jasonbres! Thank you for your recent contributions on articles related to amusement parks. I'd like to invite you to become a part of WikiProject Amusement Parks, a WikiProject which aims to focus collaboration and improve the quality of amusement park articles across Wikipedia. Feel free to stop by to learn more and sign up at the Participants page. Hope to see you over there! -- GoneIn60 ( talk) 01:38, 26 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Why did you call me a racist? Where in our MoS does it say to capitalize the names of racial groups? ― Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 23:51, 8 July 2020 (UTC) reply

A lot of news corporations and others are capitalizing "Black" when referring to the skin color, and if you don't consider that capitalization, ergo, you are racist. I'm sorry for your lack of wokeness. - Jasonbres ( talk) 23:53, 8 July 2020 (UTC) reply

P.S. Did you even read the link I put in the description? Obviously not because you are too busy being all high and mighty undoing very constructive edits. - Jasonbres ( talk) 23:54, 8 July 2020 (UTC) reply

Jasonbres, I read it the day it was published. I realize that other publications do this. Me abiding by our MoS does not make me a racist. Also, please answer my second question. ― Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 00:04, 9 July 2020 (UTC) reply

And aren't you a racist for this edit? ― Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 00:06, 9 July 2020 (UTC) reply

No. No I'm not, because while "Black" can be capitalized, "white" remains lowercased. - Jasonbres ( talk) 00:13, 9 July 2020 (UTC) reply

Jasonbres, Ah, so once the AP changes their style guide you will retroactively be a racist. Got it. Please answer my second question. ― Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 00:14, 9 July 2020 (UTC) reply

Sarcasm. How mature. And to answer your question, I made a suggestion on the MOS talk page to make this change. - Jasonbres ( talk) 00:16, 9 July 2020 (UTC) reply

P.S. They just got back to me and informed me that it is indeed being discussed. Okay, I've cooled down, and I'm sorry about my language. I probably should've said "out of touch" or nothing at all, rather than "racist". We cool? - Jasonbres ( talk) 00:21, 9 July 2020 (UTC) reply

Jasonbres, Sure. ― Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 00:33, 9 July 2020 (UTC) reply

:) - Jasonbres ( talk) 01:13, 9 July 2020 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Phineas and Ferb the Movie: Candace Against the Universe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page D23.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:14, 23 August 2020 (UTC) reply

May I ask why you changed the page of legend of everfree? I just want to know, I’m not looking for trouble, I’m asking politely why you changed it. Natethgreat1 ( talk) 02:41, 24 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm Alex 21. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- / Alex/ ₂₁ 00:11, 23 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to El Viaje Misterioso de Nuestro Jomer (The Mysterious Voyage of Homer). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. DonIago ( talk) 03:11, 9 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zoey's Extraordinary Playlist, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alice Lee.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:11, 13 January 2021 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Christmas reel. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 28#Christmas reel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:15, 28 January 2021 (UTC) reply

Just to make it absolutely clear outside of my edit summaries:

1. The word "black", as in the race, should not be capitalized per the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters/Archive 32#Proposed update to MOSCAPS regarding racial terms
2. Your find/replace method of capitalizing "black" is breaking hyperlink addresses

I understand you are trying to improve the encyclopedia, but these are not improvements. Please discontinue making this change on any other articles. TarkusAB ^{talk/ contrib} 00:05, 15 March 2021 (UTC) reply

I'm sorry, but keeping "Black" lowercase when referring to race is inherently racist. - Jasonbres ( talk) 02:23, 15 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Don't be sorry--but I don't agree that it's inherently racist; that's too strong. User:TarkusAB, I read over that discussion, and if we do that again today you might see a different result. At any rate, you can hardly forbid this user from capitalizing Black: that discussion simply means that Black with capital B is not the guideline. It doesn't mean editors can't capitalize it if they so choose, and I for one will continue to do so. BTW I find it interesting that in that discussion all the lowercase editors seemed to be right wing/conservative, and when I see it happen in article space it's often racist trolls. Drmies ( talk) 02:30, 15 March 2021 (UTC) reply

BTW, Tarkus, look at my user page--we have something in common. Drmies ( talk) 02:32, 15 March 2021 (UTC) reply

@ Drmies: Haha! what a coincidence about the user page. So I'm not well versed in the caps issue, and only found that discussion as the closest thing to a MOS stance on the topic. I don't have strong feelings on the issue, but regardless, Jasonbres should remember to avoid changing the caps style in hyperlinks as it breaks the links. TarkusAB ^{talk/ contrib} 03:09, 15 March 2021 (UTC) reply

User:TarkusAB, I really don't know when capitalization matters anymore for wikilinks, but if you're right, you're right. In that case Jasonbres could of course create some redirects. I'm not sure how well-versed I am in caps and in the MOS, but it's one of those things that, for now, is sort of up to the editor; that discussion didn't mandate either way. Thanks, Drmies ( talk) 14:08, 15 March 2021 (UTC) reply

@ Drmies: I'm talking about external links in sources, not wikilinks. e.g. https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-bachelor-cant-right-its-racist-history-with-black-lead-matt-james functions correctly, but https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-bachelor-cant-right-its-racist-history-with-Black-lead-matt-james is 404 page not found. TarkusAB ^{talk/ contrib} 14:37, 15 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Aha, I see--thanks. Drmies ( talk) 15:46, 15 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of DuckTales (2017 TV series) episodes. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Amaury • 21:00, 15 March 2021 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Big Mouth (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deadline.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:53, 20 April 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello, Jasonbres. At WikiProject My Little Pony, I'm trying to compile a list of active participants. Your name is currently listed on the active members list and you are active on Wikipedia. Would you consider yourself active on WikiProject My Little Pony? Please {{ ping}} me in your reply and see our project talk page for the latest updates. Thanks! Pamzeis ( talk) 04:58, 17 June 2021 (UTC) reply

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Color Purple. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You've already been asked not to capitalize "black", and I saw no consensus in favor of doing so, so I'm forced to assume that you're now intentionally disregarding the prior notice. DonIago ( talk) 14:53, 1 July 2021 (UTC) reply

I'm sorry, but seeing "Black" when referring to the skin color/race and not having it capitalized is very racist. - Jasonbres ( talk) 15:03, 1 July 2021 (UTC) reply

You were linked to the MoS discussion regarding the matter previously. If you want to take issue with it, you're welcome to do so at the appropriate Talk page. If you continue to knowingly make these edits in violation of WP:CONSENSUS then you are editing disruptively. DonIago ( talk) 22:15, 1 July 2021 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Spider-Man : Stuck In The Spider Verse. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 5#Spider-Man : Stuck In The Spider Verse until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Trailblazer101 ( talk) 16:47, 5 July 2021 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Behind the Attraction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marc Davis.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:58, 22 July 2021 (UTC) reply

I added a short summary for Episode 4, but please improve it if you can! -- Ssilvers ( talk) 16:20, 5 August 2021 (UTC) reply

I wrote the reasons on the talk page, I even wrote those reasons twice. [4] I read these news, it doesn't say anything about "rumors". User HoneymoonAve27 did the same to the HBO Max page removed the countries mentioned in the source. I wrote the same thing on the talk page in September but he didn't look at it [5] Eray08yigit ( talk) 17:08, 5 October 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:16, 23 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Hi. I have reverted your edit to Miles Morales, because it was not accompanied by a citation of a reliable, verifiable secondary source, as is required by various Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Since you've accumulated over 23,000 edits since 2007, I assume you know by now that content pertaining to narrative works that is evaluative, analytical or interpretive, requires a secondary source, that explicitly mentions the interpretation in question, and that relying instead on one's personal observation is sythesis, which is a form of original research. If you find appropriate sources for that passage, feel free to re-add it, or point them out to me, and I'll add it back in myself. Thanks, and Happy Holidays. Nightscream ( talk) 18:46, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm KyleJoan. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Whoopi Goldberg, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! You cannot neutrally say that a subject's claims were antisemitic and violate MOS:LABEL when that is not what is present in reliable sources. Please be more careful next time. KyleJoan ^talk 03:19, 2 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Hi. The Productions section of the article mentions the new Lydia and the rest of the cast of the resumed run. This is not a revival and should not have its own column in the cast table. The full cast is mentioned in the Productions section. -- Ssilvers ( talk) 21:13, 10 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at El Viaje Misterioso de Nuestro Jomer (The Mysterious Voyage of Homer), you may be blocked from editing. Please review WP:IPCV as well. DonIago ( talk) 04:55, 30 March 2022 (UTC) reply

The source you provided doesn't satisfy WP:IPCV, and likely also doesn't satisfy WP:RS. DonIago ( talk) 19:02, 30 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello, Jasonbres

Thank you for creating Grey Griffin.

User:Netherzone, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for your efforts! I've redirected Grey Griffin, which you created to the article Grey DeLisle which already existed, as they are the same person.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Netherzone ( talk) 15:30, 23 July 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello Jasonbres! Your input is requested for a proposal at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Amusement Parks#Draft proposal for the future of WP:APARKS. Any feedback is welcome. Thank you.

You are receiving this message as your username is listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Amusement Parks/Participants

Adog ( Talk・ Cont) 02:13, 8 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Zootopia, you may be blocked from editing. DonIago ( talk) 13:21, 13 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Is there a way to cite sources when your source was an in-person convention like D23 Expo 2022? - Jasonbres ( talk) 14:33, 13 September 2022 (UTC) reply

I'm pretty sure sources need to be published, not word-of-mouth. DonIago ( talk) 16:06, 13 September 2022 (UTC) reply

	The Original Barnstar
	Adding in more detail to the credits of episode 7B of Hamster & Gretel. BaldiBasicsFan ( talk) 18:17, 17 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Hi. Per discussions at WP:MUSICALS, and per WP:CRYSTAL, the casting tables in articles about musicals should not add new columns until the production begins previews. So many musicals get cancelled (or greatly postponed) at the last minute, and the casting tables are often overloaded as it is. Thanks for any help with this! -- Ssilvers ( talk) 19:37, 3 October 2022 (UTC) reply

Please see Talk:Bad Cinderella#Article title and WP:CRYSTAL. Regardless of what happens in this case, I wanted to ensure that you are aware that WP:CRYSTAL is closely followed—in general, articles don't have titles or significant content about future events. Johnuniq ( talk) 04:18, 4 October 2022 (UTC) reply

The source cited to justify one of new writers, season 48, is absolutely bogus. It's ideological maneuvering and it's explicitly discussed amongst these people seeking to disseminate BS about how to circumvent Wikipedias citing sources, etc. It'd be a shame to see an encyclopedia held in such high regard undermined by scheming clout chasers using Wikipedias prolific presence as a medium for this rotten practice. The woman contributed nothing to the season thus far and has yet to have any official contract signed. How can she be listed as a writer, unpaid intern or contributor if she's in fact none of these things? I implore you to keep high standards of the encyclopedia and be vigilant for fraudulent sources used as citation. Thank you, and please be wary of this August White. She's been trying to insert her name all over this site for months. 197.253.198.175 ( talk) 06:06, 13 October 2022 (UTC) reply

This is misinformation and you are so pathetic for this. Please get off Wikipedia. Blu30Top ( talk) 20:06, 13 October 2022 (UTC) reply

The user 197.253.198.175 is being incredibly racist by erasing Auguste White from the Writers section in the season 48 page and I have proof of them doing so. This is a message I received from them: "Keep that nappy headed ho off the site. This is the beginning. Keep this up and 1000% she'll be hit by petition to be permanently banned from anything to do with SNL or NBC at large. Tens of thousands of people on petition, endless barrages on social media and absolute character assassination. This is final warning." Can you please have them blocked and reported as this extremely disgusting and evil behavior. I can't believe this. This is completely unacceptable. Blu30Top ( talk) 15:43, 13 October 2022 (UTC) reply

Thank you for informing me. I had my suspicions because rarely does anyone with an IP address for a username actually post messages on talk pages. - Jasonbres ( talk) 15:49, 13 October 2022 (UTC) Jasonbres ( talk) 15:49, 13 October 2022 (UTC) reply

P.S. Now that I have this knowledge, I believe we ought to make Saturday Night Live (season 48 a protected IP page to prevent users with unknown IP addresses to make these kind of changes. - Jasonbres ( talk) 16:03, 13 October 2022 (UTC) Jasonbres ( talk) 16:03, 13 October 2022 (UTC) reply

Hi, Jasonbres. Your input is requested at WikiProject Amusement Parks, as there is a discussion about the reliability of some sources which can be found at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Amusement Parks#Reliable source discussion. Thank you!

Note: You recieved this notification because you are listed as a participant for WikiProject Amusement Parks.

Harobouri ^{T • C (he/him)} 16:52, 3 December 2022 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kimberly Akimbo (musical), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Akimbo.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 12 April 2023 (UTC) reply

Hi. Just here to let you know, regarding your edits at Spider-Man 2 and Spider-Man 3, that a previous film isn't a prequel. A prequel is by definition a film released afterwards but set before. E.g.: Star Wars: Episode I – The Phantom Menace (1999) is a prequel to the original Star Wars trilogy (1977–1983), but it's not a prequel of Star Wars: Episode II – Attack of the Clones (2002). — El Millo ( talk) 16:27, 20 April 2023 (UTC) reply

In hindsight, maybe I should've said "predecessors" or "preceding films"? - Jasonbres ( talk) 16:39, 20 April 2023 (UTC) Jasonbres ( talk) 16:39, 20 April 2023 (UTC) reply

That would've worked, but I simply reduced it to "Raimi's Spider-Man trilogy" to make it simpler, I just wanted to clarify the definition of prequel because it's a mistake I've seen even in reputable sources from time to time. — El Millo ( talk) 18:28, 20 April 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page The Wonderful World of Mickey Mouse, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A " bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 17:56, 13 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Twitter, you may be blocked from editing. CJ-Moki ( talk) 18:24, 24 July 2023 (UTC) reply

I apologize for that. I let my anger get the best of me. I've been editing on this site for many years and probably should've known better. It won't happen again. I promise. - Jasonbres ( talk) 21:12, 24 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Jasonbres, the first 5 episodes of the new Futurama season have aired and no one made the articles, can you at least tell the story of "The Impossible Stream". PLEASE?! PowerRanger200 ( talk) 14:03, 24 August 2023 (UTC) reply

No one has made the articles because they haven't been as noteworthy enough to constitute separate articles. - Jasonbres ( talk) 14:18, 24 August 2023 (UTC) reply

@ PowerRanger200 You've now posted this on my talk page and another's, how about you create the draft yourself? -- Alex_21  _TALK 20:54, 24 August 2023 (UTC) reply

The redirect How do you do, fellow kids? has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 28 § How do you do, fellow kids? until a consensus is reached. Gaioa ( T C L) 11:04, 28 August 2023 (UTC) reply

The redirect MAGA Mike has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 31 § MAGA Mike until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 ( talk) 01:13, 31 October 2023 (UTC) reply

The redirect January 6, 2021 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 29 § January 6, 2021 until a consensus is reached. Esolo5002 ( talk) 03:06, 29 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Doubt: A Parable, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A " bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 22:42, 6 February 2024 (UTC) reply

I believe there is a mix up and an error in the April shows for season 49 of SNL. Kristen Wiig is hosting in April 6 and Ryan Gosling is hosting in April 16. there is no April 20th show. M1107290 ( talk) 01:25, 14 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The redirect Maestro (upcoming film) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 19 § Maestro (upcoming film) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 ( talk) 12:08, 19 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The redirect Black Scrubs has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 24 § Black Scrubs until a consensus is reached. Rusalkii ( talk) 21:42, 24 March 2024 (UTC) reply