Right.. And what was exactly I vandalized? -- שבור ( talk) 09:01, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Victoria Silvstedt. Users who
edit disruptively or refuse to
collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the
three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the
talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains
consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an
appropriate noticeboard or seek
dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary
page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Signed by Barts1a
Suggestions/complements?
Complaints? 09:13, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
Also: Please see
this wikipedia policy.
They have been colorful to say the least... You don't appear to have a firm idea of what constitutes vandalism as yet. I would suggest that you read up on what constitutes vandalism on wikipedia before you set off on you quest to destroy vandalism again. You have wikipedia's best interest at heart; you're just going about it the wrong way. Signed by Barts1a Suggestions/complements? Complaints? 12:11, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
I didn't see any violation of Wikipedia policy in that comment and have restored it. Care to explain? Yworo ( talk) 22:23, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
below this notice, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Nick-D (
talk) 10:33, 5 December 2010 (UTC)I have blocked you for the following posts in which you insult and threaten another editor:
[1],
[2],
[3]
[4]. You were warned for this kind of attitude by
User:Bwilkins at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive651#Big Brother of The Party needs some time out.
Nick-D (
talk) 10:33, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
Wow. well can you at least block that one IP too?
Big Brother of The Party (
talk) 10:34, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello Big Brother of The Party. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Amy Wren, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. Thank you. Ϣere SpielChequers 14:45, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
John Mattson, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.
Yworo (
talk) 15:31, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at
Taka Michinoku, you may be
blocked from editing.
Yworo (
talk) 15:33, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
What's up with this? [5] ← Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 23:21, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
I am not a sock :). What evidence is there. I believe the block is on speculation. I am not a sock. I am using this account and this accoubt only. Big Brother of The Party ( talk) 23:31, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
I am not Baseball Fanatic. I will fight these accusations. You have no evidence. I am Big Brother.... and Big Brother only. Big Brother of The Party ( talk) 23:40, 8 December 2010 (UTC)