Children's literature Template‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Tasks you can do: history watch purge Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks. Add {{Portal|Children's literature}} to the See also section of related articles. Tag the talk pages of related articles with {{ WikiProject Children's literature}} Join WikiProject Children's literature and list yourself as a Participant in the project. Cleanup: A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects. Deletion discussions: listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability Rate the Unassessed articles in the Children's literature WikiProject. References: Add references to Unreferenced BLPs. Requested articles: Create a requested article on literature Stubs: Improve a stub-class article

Should When We Were Very Young and Now We Are Six be removed from the template? Technically, these are not actual Winnie-the-Pooh novels; When We Were Very Young features the first of appearance of the character, and Now We Are Six features illistrations of the character. Thoughts? -- Cartoon Boy ( talk) 9:56, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Well, none of these books are novels in any normal use of the term. -- Pfold ( talk) 21:28, 10 December 2009 (UTC) reply

I don't think the alphabetical listing of characters in the template is the best way to organize them. Pooh himself should be first, no? And the others should be listed in rough order of importance after him, something like: Winnie-the-Pooh, Piglet, Tigger, Christopher Robin, Rabbit, Eeyore, Kanga, Roo, Gopher, Lottie, Heffalump, Woozle, Lumpy, Kessie. Simple _but powerful 16:54, 13 December 2009 (UTC) reply

Why is there no article for this video game? 2604:2000:7FC0:1:E8D7:5FA9:D5A4:AD1 ( talk) 00:48, 6 October 2014 (UTC) reply

@ Eggishorn: how can you argue that hes not associated with Winnie-the-Pooh when the section Xi Jinping#Winnie the Pooh caricature and censorship exists? Horse Eye Jack ( talk) 20:18, 12 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Please do not open the same discussion in multiple places. You already started the discussion at Xi Jinping so this one is redundant and confusing. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 20:31, 12 August 2020 (UTC) reply

A good way to tell is ask the question "Would this template be placed on the linked article?" and, in this case, it wouldn't. If an article is added to 'Related' on a template it should also be placed on the linked page. Interesting though, I haven't seen this meme before. Randy Kryn ( talk) 20:32, 12 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Its gone beyond being a meme to the point where the BBC will write a few hundred words on Mike Pompeo posting a picture of his dog with their Winnie-the-Pooh chew toy [1]... Thats not a casual or unnoteworthy association. Horse Eye Jack ( talk) 20:35, 12 August 2020 (UTC) reply