This template is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
food and
drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review
WP:Trivia and
WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects,
select here.
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Turkey and
related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey articles
I have reverted the absolutely screaming colour scheme. I don't object to rather soft colours, but this scheme will be distracting from the contents in the article itself. The Bannertalk 21:20, 2 December 2013 (UTC)reply
Then change it to darker red. Do not remove all the red color.It is Turkish cuisine and it has to have red and white.
KazekageTR (
talk) 14:21, 3 December 2013 (UTC)reply
yes, the addition of spurious colours should be discussed first.
Frietjes (
talk) 16:51, 8 December 2013 (UTC)reply
see the foot of
Mangal (barbecue), no reason for one to be coloured and the other not.
Frietjes (
talk) 18:46, 8 December 2013 (UTC)reply
Well Frietjes, it is allowed to put colors into templates after it has been approved or/after it has been disgussed. You may put some color to other template, if the color is O.K. for sure.
per
WP:BRD, there is no problem with adding them, and there is also no problem with reverting the addition, then discussing it. however,
WP:BRD does not mean BRRRRR with no D. also, copying an entire thread is offensive, since it implies that I somehow did not read the thread on the other talk page, which was about a sidebar not a navbox.
Frietjes (
talk) 19:13, 8 December 2013 (UTC)reply
Yes, I agree, we don't need the extra colours. I didn't see any other cuisine navboxes using colouring, so I reverted it back to its original state. Thanks!
Plastikspork―Œ(talk) 01:59, 23 December 2013 (UTC)reply
And again the prior discussion, although mainly done on the now merged "Template talk:Turkish cuisine" is bluntly ignored. There was discussion, but ms. Frietjes decided to ignore that but TfD that template. But even now, the discussion is ignored as
WP:IDONTLIKEIT. Please restore the colours as discussed in the discussion below that ms. Friets so discretely
deleted when it turned out that there was prior discussion about the colour scheme at both templates but centralised at the other template. Two discussion about one colour scheme used on two near identical templates, although preferred by ms. Frietjes, is an utter waste of time... The Bannertalk 02:21, 23 December 2013 (UTC)reply
I've updated the color scheme and added new sections to the template. And this is the best picture among all those 'sofra' pics. Please dont change anything before we talk it in here. Lütfen burada tartışmadan hiçbirşey değiştirmeyin.
KazekageTR (
talk) 23:15, 21 November 2013 (UTC)reply
I have reverted the absolutely screaming colour scheme. I don't object to rather soft colours, but this scheme will be distracting from the contents in the article itself. The Bannertalk 21:22, 2 December 2013 (UTC)reply
Then change it to darker red. Do not remove all the red color.It is Turkish cuisine and it has to have red and white.
KazekageTR (
talk) 14:22, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
KazekageTR (
talk) 14:20, 3 December 2013 (UTC)reply
I think
WP:BRD is in order. The strong red colour was boldly added, and was then reverted as disputed. The next step is to discuss its inclusion here before restoring it.
Anna Frodesiak (
talk) 14:26, 3 December 2013 (UTC)reply
Can you explain to me why it has to have red and white? Food had more colours than that and we serve an worldwide encyclopaedia without space for nationalistic symbols. But most important: the choices for you made were absolutely screaming and distracting. The Bannertalk 15:34, 3 December 2013 (UTC)reply
Choosing colours
The present pink looks a bit like a
band-aid. The red is incredibly overpowering. Can we all find a nice compromise?
well could you suggest a tone of red then please Ms. Frodesiak ??? but like i said to The Banner, it has to have red color, like the Greek one has blue and the Canadian templates has red and white.
KazekageTR (
talk) 14:41, 3 December 2013 (UTC)reply
I'm happy with a red. I'll let you and others suggest something.
Anna Frodesiak (
talk) 15:20, 3 December 2013 (UTC)reply
a different red perhaps an idea? The Bannertalk 15:43, 3 December 2013 (UTC)reply
how is that red ? by the way i think we should stick to the red which is on the Turkish flag. How bout that ? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
KazekageTR (
talk •
contribs) 16:03, 4 December 2013 (UTC)reply
You have many colours of
red. I must admit that the present shade of red is far less screaming and distracting. Do we have a deal on that shade? The Bannertalk 19:03, 4 December 2013 (UTC)reply
I like what's in the navbox right now. Red, but not so dark that the black lettering is hard to see. Not so bright that bulls rush into the room and attack the monitor. Seems good to me.
Anna Frodesiak (
talk) 23:31, 4 December 2013 (UTC)reply
proposal
I propose to use the same colour scheme as used at
Template:Turkish cuisine, as discussed earlier there. A copy of the discussion is added here under the header "For ms. Frietjes". The Bannertalk 18:51, 8 December 2013 (UTC)reply
I propose that one of the two templates be deleted as they are entirely redundant. or we should go back to the uncoloured version which has been used for years per
WP:BRD and
wp:deviations. I also propose you stop calling me 'Mr' since that is not my gender.
Frietjes (
talk) 19:00, 8 December 2013 (UTC)reply
Ms. Frietjes, we can make a discussion about deleting this template, as the other one is pretty useful. On the talk page of the
Template:Turkish cuisine there is a discussion about it too. I propose a voting or sth. like that.
KazekageTR (
talk) 21:48, 8 December 2013 (UTC)reply
If one should choose between the two templates, I would keep this one (navbar Cuisine of Turkey) and delete the other one (infobox Turkish cuisine). I find the other template really very disturbing. Just look at the
Pilaf page! All those infobox/sidebar templates (Turkish cuisine, Indian cuisine, Iranian cuisine) are cluttering up the page. Normally one should have no more than one infobox on a single page (as pointed out in the template documentation), but there there are four! If one continues this way, one would also add the Greek cuisine sidebar there etc. I see only one place where the Turkish cuisine infobox is reasonably located: the page
Turkish cuisine. On all other pages the navbar is much more appropriate. It does not disturb reading the article about a particular dish, while someone interested in other turkish dishes may find the links at the bottom. My proposal is thus: Remove the infobox from all pages except perhaps the page
Turkish cuisine. Use this navbar on all other relevant pages.Off-shell (
talk) 21:12, 9 December 2013 (UTC)reply