This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
There is a draft for this Template page located at Draft:Template:NHL. |
This template has a template sandbox located at Template:NHL/sandbox |
www.reboundshuffleboard.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.109.115.137 ( talk) 18:52, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
What do the NBA and other sports have to do with the NHL? Also, we should add a link to the World Cup of Hockey.-- Sonjaaa 04:11, Sep 6, 2004 (UTC)
I'm working on standardizing the various major North American leagues into a standard template, for the ease of viewing. As a result, I've been taking ideas from one and transplanting them to others. Here, I modified the box to break the teams down into divisions, like in the NBA box. I think it makes it easier to find teams, organized by division. Feel free to leave comments. -- Kermitmorningstar 06:13, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
The template needs a margin so that when templates are placed successively on pages such as the NHL page that there is a minimal amount of space between them. The alternative to include the space in the mage but that leaves too much space, and is usually cleaned up when people make changes with AWB, etc. -- Jeff3000 21:53, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
I think we should change the box so its more like the other league boxes. Put the teams in by division instead of putting them in alphabetically. Agreed? Disagreed? Portlygrub 11:06, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
1. Moved individual trophies/awards to {{
NHLawards}} and replaced with link to
awards page. Done
2. Moved defunct teams to {{
NHLdefunct}} and replaced with link to
defunct page. Done
3. Converted to new {{
Navbox with columns}} template and implemented same format/color scheme as {{
NFL}}, {{
MLB}}, and {{
NBA}}. Done
I also added a link to the
WHA, but I believe that was the only change I made (unless I lost track). There are a few issues with the new {{
Navbox with columns}}, such as I am not happy with the way I placed the Conferences, but the template does not allow a title to span more than one column (as of yet). Please feel free to add/delete/revert and provide feed back. Regards.--
Old Hoss 18:40, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Aren't the Conference colours reversed? Red is Eastern and West is blue. -- Hasek is the best 02:55, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Should the links for each individual team link to the respective current season? Jmlk 1 7 19:29, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Hey I created a new page on the NHL YoungStars Game I am just wondering if you want to place it in the template. 13:41, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi. Just a quick note - doing minor tweaks to a couple of related articles - 1924-25 NHL season and 1981-82 NHL season, I noticed this template at the end. All well and good, but it seems to appear on those articles as 'National Hockey League (2007-2008)'. I don't know if this is intended, or some weird side effect of templates - but it looks odd to have an article about the sport in the 1920s apparently using a template which is related to the 2000s... CultureDrone ( talk) 22:37, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Wouldn't it be logical to have Western Conference on the left, and the Eastern Conference to the right? I mean, that's how it appears on a map. LarRan ( talk) 20:28, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Hello. Can anyone user make interwiki link to fi:Malline:NHL? Thanks. -- Nurtsio ( talk) 18:31, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
The article List of Stanley Cup Final overtime series winners has been added and removed from the template. I actually think it was a good addition, but wanted to add a common discussion area. — MrDolomite • Talk 15:49, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
Next to Stanley Cup, the order of the rounds should be "Playoffs—Conerence Finals—Finals—Champions". 71.146.8.88 ( talk) 01:32, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
This template is obsolete. It must be updated for the new alignment. Randall Bart Talk 19:43, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The alphabetization in me might be going crazy, but the Tampa Bay Lightning and Pittsburgh Penguins should be switched around. The rest of the template is alphabetized normally.
24.239.120.182 ( talk) 23:42, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
With the imminent announcement of the 32nd team, there are a couple of options at the top of my head:
Option 1: Adding it to the Pacific Division column
Option 2: Using a "Future team" row, similar to Template:Major League Soccer, and what was done here when Vegas was announced. [1]
I would prefer the second option. In the first option, I do not like how it will cause blank spaces under the Eastern Conference teams, making it appear at first glance that it is the Western Conference that has more teams. Zzyzx11 ( talk) 03:16, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Can someone mirror the template into the template sandbox? template:NHL/sandbox
Also add a documentation template at the bottom in the noinclude section
{{documentation|content= This is a navbox footer for [[National Hockey League]] (NHL) articles. The NHL is a top-level elite super league for professional ice hockey in North America. }}
This is a navbox footer for National Hockey League (NHL) articles.
The use of the documentation footer is to link to the sandbox to ascertain that the sandbox exists. It autogenerates a link to the sandbox and a mirror command to remirror the latest version into the sandbox.
-- 67.70.26.89 ( talk) 13:56, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
I'm not sure why it is to be discussed but as it has been reverted i will bring it to the talk page. I intended to update the template to show the current official divisions and the removal of conferences for the 2020-21 season. Changes are made to reflect the current status of the NHL and have been made whenever a team moves division in previous seasons. This should be implemented asap as the current division's are outdated and will confuse users. Triggerbit ( talk) 01:30, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Fine, you guys win. I'll rollback this change now (wasn't sure where to place this reply, so I'm putting it right here). – Piranha 249 02:30, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
I think it's flat out wrong to have the "Potential expansion" article in the Future teams subsection. In fact, I know it's wrong. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 18:35, 5 June 2021 (UTC)