Trains: Rapid transit Template‑class

Trains Portal This template is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Associated projects or task forces: /  This template is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit.

California: San Francisco Bay Area Template‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. This template is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force.

how long is considered appropriate to keep "proposed" stations listed on the template? they're linked from elsewhere, but not a lot of active work seems to have been done on things like Calaveras station.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjdestroyerofworlds ( talk • contribs)

We really do need to slim down this massive Calaveras and Livermore seem pretty unlikely to go anywhere. Irvington might be worth keeping since it had environmental work last year - but it should be under the expansion subheading to reduce the template height. Pi.1415926535 ( talk) 02:47, 19 January 2018 (UTC) reply