This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
U.S. state of
New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
higher education,
universities, and
colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the
discussion, and see the project's
article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles
Logo
The logo
User:Odder has implemented is not correct for digital use -- notice the extra rings around the crest and seal -- it's only for print. Unless a digital logo can be found, I believe the prior version superior and supported by Cornell brand guidelines --
https://cornellbrand.cornell.edu/downloads/cornell-brand-book.pdf. —Eustress 20:15, 1 August 2014 (UTC)reply
I've restored the alternate web logo for now -- the print logo (taken from the magazine) does not go here. Perhaps we can get the default logo in web format from
http://weill.cornell.edu/its/web/design/branding/? —Eustress 17:21, 2 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Wikipedia uses representative artwork in our articles, this frequently means we do not use web logos, which may be different in quality, colour scheme, or format, and instead use a more representative logo. We're not bound by usage rules and can use whichever version of a logo is best. I've therefore added back in Odder's image and removed yours, which is now entirely different and in no way representative.
Nick (
talk) 23:06, 3 August 2014 (UTC)reply
I see your points... I've gone with the original Weill-specific logo, but I've replaced the wordmark with the seal, which is what the lead image of the infobox is supposed to be. —Eustress 15:29, 4 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Human Rights section
I'm frankly not sure that that uncited section is sufficiently notable for inclusion. Tagged but still no refs. --
2603:7000:2143:8500:A493:133E:BF54:BA9F (
talk) 03:37, 31 December 2021 (UTC)reply