This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCE articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Water, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Water supply-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WaterWikipedia:WikiProject WaterTemplate:WikiProject WaterWater articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
I propose we remove the last few sentences, from "In many parts ..." to "...... Frank Leghorn". These sentences are not relevant, are a bit tendentious, seem to be written for the writer's children ("things which are nasty"), and are scarcely English - the sentence before last ("We use these methods [er ... what methods?] to our benefits and also for the waste which always occur when we take the animals and add them"), in fact, is garbled, ungrammatical and totally incomprehensible. Or do we have a case of vandalism here anyway?
Maelli (
talk) 05:28, 4 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Extraction vs Abstraction?
Is "water extraction" the same as "water abstraction"? ("water abstraction" redirects to here) If so, can someone please confirm and add a statement to this effect?
dq (
talk) 19:45, 30 October 2018 (UTC)reply