This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
@
E.poul: The major issue in your proposed article/prose is the lack of
secondaryandreliable sources throughout. Almost every reference is either a UNESCO-affiliated site, or UNESCO-published book/journal, etc. Please see Wikipedia's
guideline on usage of primary sources—CX Zoom[he/him](
let's talk • {
C•
X}) 16:10, 9 March 2023 (UTC)reply
This document aims to correct the "activities" part of the UNESCO page, which is not up to date. Therefore, the information includes only a small part of the subjects dealt with by the organisation.
The aim of this work is to enrich the existing content and to correct it.
In order to be as accurate and concise as possible, the work is based on 164 sources, and since we are talking about UNESCO's activities, the most reliable sources are mainly publications or research produced by UNESCO on the subjects concerned. However, in order to comply with the rules of the platform, 50 sources out of 164 sources are secondary references, whose researchers, authors or journalists are not affiliated with UNESCO. These sources represent a total of more than 30% of the references used. They have been carefully selected and come mainly from ResearchGate, JSTOR, Cairn and also include links to the websites of the major events mentioned.
I hope that this clarification will best explain the high regard I have for the rules of the platform and I remain at your disposal for any discussion on this subject.
Hi, I have been busy for the past few days due to real life commitments, so I've added a {{edit COI}} template at the top of this section for other editors to have a look at it. Thanks! —CX Zoom[he/him](
let's talk • {
C•
X}) 16:10, 13 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Not done: Please cite secondary and independent reliable sources. Best regards, --
Johannes (
Talk) (
Contribs) (
Articles) 19:17, 6 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Hello
Johannes, thank you for your help. I have reduced the number of sources and added new ones. The majority are now independent, reliable and secondary sources. Does this work for you? Best regards,
E.poul (
talk) 16:06, 18 May 2023 (UTC)reply
I would review this, but I don't see where the proposed text is. When ready to proceed with the requested information, kindly change the {{
request edit}} template's answer parameter to read from |ans=yes to |ans=no. Thank you! Regards, Spintendo 23:13, 1 July 2023 (UTC)reply