This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

California: San Francisco Bay Area High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Top-importance). United States: U.S. counties Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. counties.

Wondering how to edit this U.S. County Entry?
The WikiProject U.S. Counties standards might help.

I removed 'most county residents prefer to visit the many county or state parks in the hills surrounding Santa Clara Valley when they need to exercise.' from the section discussing the street network.

It seems very subjective. If that is not the case, feel free to readd it with proper references. -- Jdeboer 1 July 2005 19:36 (UTC)

Santa Clara County has an extensive reservoir system (170,000 acre-feet) that may (or may not) be worth a mention in the article. For an urbanized area, I think this is unusual. -- 67.125.30.188 18:09, 27 October 2006 (UTC) reply

Where in the world did it say that Latinos would be a majority in 2010? They aren't even a plurality or even 30% of Santa Clara County's population right now... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.5.170.110 ( talk) 00:46, 29 November 2007 (UTC) reply

In the "History" section, the following statement is made: "In 1882, Santa Clara County tried to levy taxes upon property of the Southern Pacific Railroad within county boundaries. The result was the U.S. Supreme Court case of Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad, 118 U.S. 394 (1886), in which the Court extended Due Process rights to artificial legal entities."

Yet if you follow the link to the court case, it clearly states: "The Supreme Court never reached the equal protection claims. Nonetheless, this case is sometimes incorrectly cited as holding that corporations, as juristic persons, are protected by the Fourteenth Amendment."

I suggest the following change: "In 1882, Santa Clara County tried to levy taxes upon property of the Southern Pacific Railroad within county boundaries. The result was the U.S. Supreme Court case of Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad, 118 U.S. 394 (1886). Some people incorrectly claim that the Court extended Due Process rights to artificial legal entities in their court decision. However, the Supreme Court never reached the equal protection claims. Nonetheless, this case is sometimes incorrectly cited as holding that corporations, as juristic persons, are protected by the Fourteenth Amendment."

Proper citing to the various articles should be included in the County wiki entry. Tried100X ( talk) 01:52, 29 October 2008 (UTC) reply

Please reinstate the fact of Laurie Smith becoming the first elected female sheriff in California history...anyone who works for Santa Clara County(especially in the Sheriff's Department) should be aware of this, and report on it, providing the appropriate verifications where necessary(especially if that person lives there)...I trierd, but it was promptly deleted as a "lie"...which it ISN'T!... Baldwin91006 ( talk) 02:40, 3 February 2009 (UTC) reply

The picture montage under Santa Clara County is identical to the one in the San Jose page. And while it's true that all images are in Santa Clara County (on account of San Jose being in the county) I wonder is it possible to get a picture that shows more than just images of San Jose? There is surely more to the county than just one (admittedly large) city! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.129.76.68 ( talk) 17:34, 15 December 2011 (UTC) reply

A change was just made as of 18 April 2015, from DNC to DEM, with relevance to the Democratic Party. Maybe this is consistent with the other comparative term GOP. That would be the primary consideration, so it seems. Make sure to use similar terms for each party. DNC would be an appropriate opposite to RNC, which conveys the "National Convention" of either party (Republican or Democrat). But, GOP and especially the term DEM, seems to be slang reference. I'm guessing the change is alright; but, in this context, I'm not sure what's truly appropriate. Can anyone explain the rationale? Are there any other alternatives? Ca.papavero ( talk) 22:37, 18 April 2015 (UTC) reply

GOP stands for " Grand Old Party" and is a time honored synonym for the Republican party. DEM is just an abbreviation, hardly a slang reverence. -- Scalhotrod (Talk) ☮ღ☺ 23:48, 18 April 2015 (UTC) reply

I picked-up the idea of DEM being "slang" from Wikipedia's own disambiguation page for that term. ^[1] I do realize it can also be an abbreviation. It depends on how its verbalized, usually. Anyway, it's thought for further considerations, if needs be. Ca.papavero ( talk) 00:39, 19 April 2015 (UTC) reply

Just as DEM is clearer than DNC, I think REP would be clearer than GOP or RNC. But there's actually no need to abbreviate to three letters, so the best thing might be to write out "Democratic" and "Republican" in the table headings.— Stepheng3 ( talk) 20:54, 20 April 2015 (UTC) reply

It is confusing that Spanish-speaking people of mixed Native American and European descent are classified as 'white' rather than 'Other' or 'Native American'. Most articles would mention 'Non-Hispanic whites', but not this one. Can somebody please find and include this information? Humanophage ( talk) 17:50, 11 November 2016 (UTC) reply

{{geodata-check}}

The following coordinate fixes are needed for

— 83.121.54.83 ( talk) 21:10, 16 June 2021 (UTC) reply

You haven't said what you think is wrong with the coordinates in the article. I've adjusted them a bit to be nearer the center of the county; but if you still think that there is an error, you'll need to provide a clear explanation of what it is. Deor ( talk) 17:04, 17 June 2021 (UTC) reply

A request for comment is underway at Talk:Silicon Valley#RfC: Inclusion criteria of Silicon Valley, Santa Clara Valley and Santa Clara County, California. Please feel free to share your thoughts. Binksternet ( talk) 18:47, 9 September 2021 (UTC) reply