This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Amphibians and Reptiles Low‑importance San Francisco garter snake is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. California: San Francisco Bay Area This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

San Francisco garter snake was a good article, but it was removed from the list as it no longer met the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. Review: May 18, 2007.

A fact from San Francisco garter snake appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 May 2006. The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that the San Francisco garter snake is an endangered species capable of digesting toxic newts but is not found in San Francisco? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2006/May.

Why is the "g" and "s" capitalized in garter snake? It isn't a complete proper noun, as if it were all a place or anything. Mike H. That's hot 21:41, 15 May 2006 (UTC) reply

the literature shows it both ways. i guess i was playing to the consistency of wikipedia where it is capitalised in the Common Garter Snake article. Covalent 22:27, 15 May 2006 (UTC) reply

Wikipedia:Naming conventions (fauna) - Dawson 23:21, 15 May 2006 (UTC) reply

the wiki fauna naming conventions is somewhat ambiguous, but in the five examples i read in the conventions all five had caps. further the following quote is found there: "The underlying rationale for capitalization is that this signals to the reader that we are indicating a particular, exact species and avoiding ambiguity." this sentiment is clearly applicable here since we are trying to tell the reader foremost that this is a recognized distinct species and not just a "form" of the common garter snake or an area name. Covalent 00:11, 16 May 2006 (UTC) reply

I have designated this page as an importance=High based upon the fact that this is within a small number of endangered reptiles in the state. Its range is also associated with a densely populated part of the state in a locale of high "name recognition". Anlace 16:52, 22 October 2006 (UTC) reply

I notice that the article doesn't really have any information on captive populations. In particular, might it be worth mentioning that there are, to my knowledge, only 10 individuals in US zoos, 4 on display at the San Francisco Zoo and 6 in a Southern California zoo (I think the San Diego one) for breeding purposes (IIRC)? I'm thinking the breeding population is probably noteworthy enough; and the only displayed population in the US being in San Francisco might also be noteworthy, especially since all 10 used to be housed there (although I suppose I am probably a bit biased on that note, so a second opinion is good). And yes, I can get more information/confirm stuff if it's needed. - Bulbaboy 01:10, 16 May 2006 (UTC) reply

possibly worth mentioning, but i dont have reference to the above. if you can provide ref i shall be glad to add a mention. Covalent 13:53, 16 May 2006 (UTC) reply

Okay, found a reference by Googling it. SFGate.com has what looks like a good article here, and it even mentions that 6 went to San Diego. I also found the San Francisco Zoo's fact sheet on the snakes (although that was through Google, not their search function, for some reason); since you've got a fact sheet link up from another zoo anyway (i.e. indicated that fact sheets are worthwhile links), I'm thinking it might be nice to add one from a zoo where they're actually being displayed, so I guess I'll stick that in the external links. - Bulbaboy 17:15, 16 May 2006 (UTC) reply

The article indicates that these snakes range south of San Francisco. However, about 10 years ago my son and I were at the playground in Glen Park Canyon, San Francisco. Several children saw a snake and one of the dad's caught it. I'm no authority, but that gentleman claimed that it was a San Francisco Garter Snake. Other than being actually in San Francisco, the habitat is correct: heavily vegitated wetlands (the bottom of the canyon) with hills around. The snake was released up the canyon.

you should publish an article on your sighting. it would be quite significant if verified. to my knowledge there is no literature to support populations in sf. in fact some of the literature emphatically states the species is not in sf. cheers Covalent 13:55, 16 May 2006 (UTC) reply

While climbing down my back yard (Ulloa near Kensington Street in San Francisco), I saw one today (Aug. 25, 2011). Naturally, it fled and stopped when it found itself unable to go beneath my retaining wall. It studied me and probably figured out that I was not a threat. This was the first time in over twelve years that I've seen one in the back yard. 1Z-203 out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.17.116.118 ( talk) 23:38, 25 August 2011 (UTC) reply

In the early 1960s we found one around 130 Fillmore St., corner of Germania. Someone who knew snakes identified it as a San Francisco Garter Snake. They explained that it was rare. Sightings get mentioned in the news occasionally. Zyxwv99 ( talk) 22:24, 9 August 2015 (UTC) reply

That's certainly possible, but isn't it more likely that it was an escaped pet? I've found exotic pets wandering throughout the neighborhoods of the Bay Area. There was even a trend of keeping pet alligators in the 1970s, as you may recall, some of which found their way into the streets. Although it is mostly shrouded in urban legend now, I saw one in 1977. And before anyone dismisses this idea, look into how easy it was to get a pet alligator up to the 1970s. Younger people might not realize how much of a wild west the marketplace in exotic animals was back then. Viriditas ( talk) 02:09, 26 September 2023 (UTC) reply

This article has been nominated for delisting as a good article. Please provide comments for the review. ChicagoPimp 01:54, 8 May 2007 (UTC) reply

This article has been delisted per WP:GA/R. It does not meet GA criteria, which can be found at WP:WIAGA. Once the article is brought up to standard, it may be renominated for GA.

Regards, LaraLove ^T/ _C 17:07, 18 May 2007 (UTC) reply

Hi, I live in Berlin and have seen San Francisco gartersnakes in a number of pet stores.

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 August 2022 and 2 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Pumpkinsmash1 ( article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Pumpkinsmash1 ( talk) 22:15, 21 October 2022 (UTC) reply