This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Russian language article. This is
not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Russian language is a
former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check
the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a
WikiProject dedicated to coverage of
Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the
project page, or contribute to the
project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belarus, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Belarus on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelarusWikipedia:WikiProject BelarusTemplate:WikiProject BelarusBelarus articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kyrgyzstan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Kyrgyzstan-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KyrgyzstanWikipedia:WikiProject KyrgyzstanTemplate:WikiProject KyrgyzstanKyrgyzstan articles
The
contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
You must be logged-in, have 10 edits and an account age of 4 days
Verify : the whole article, especially History section
Other : rewrite Grammar section. Also borrowing of words, due to Peter I (who spoke Dutch himself and started bringing Europeans to Russia) should be mentioned. Russian has
a significant number of Dutch and French words.
"Inter ethnic language"
I have to remove some countries from the infobox, because interethnic has not any official status also the sources based on some analyses, nothing worthy. Also defunct organization should be removed as well.
Beshogur (
talk) 10:22, 29 April 2020 (UTC)reply
You've misunderstood very gravely what "interethnic" is used for. It makes no claims about an official language status. If it did, it would be listed under the language section "Official languages". Interethnic language is a language that, de jure or de facto, has been used in the country between ethnic groups. Hence the name: inter (between) ethnic (ethnic group). In any case sourced content must be talked about before removal, you cannot just remove sourced data on Wikipedia and add justification post-hoc.
Lamensi (
talk) 05:46, 1 May 2020 (UTC)reply
No claims about an official status? This is a reason to remove it from the infobox. So let's put English on every country's "inter ethnic language" section. Did you check both countries constitution? Russian is already listed as minority language in Uzbekistan, no reason to add this again. In Turkmenistan, Russian has no single official status. Also please bring English sources. Those Russian sources doesn't seem official.
Beshogur (
talk) 10:15, 1 May 2020 (UTC)reply
English sources are not necessary for a valid citation. I realise Russian has no official status in Turkmenistan. That's why it's marked interethnic language, not official, notedly. Further, if you want to debate a source, you do it **before** removal, not **after**. Page stays as is while talk can be opened about validity of source. --
Lamensi (
talk) 10:42, 1 May 2020 (UTC)reply
First of all, Russian is not official language in Russia. Its status is called "state language", the highest level in Russia and Belarus (+ non-UN members states).
List of territorial entities where Russian is an official language is not quite correct. Also I agree that defunct organization should be moved from the infobox to text of the article.
TarzanASG (
talk) 15:18, 2 May 2020 (UTC)reply
I suggest the following and without flags:
nationwide status
state language status [show/hide]
Russia
Belarus
non-UN member states (or without non-UN member states in the infoxbox)
South Ossetia
Donetsk People's Republic
Luhansk People's Republic
Transnistria (literally Russian has "status of official language" but there is no "state language" in the country, i.e. this is the highest level)
official language status or similar nationwide status defined by constitution (i.e. the second level after "state language") [show/hide]
Kazakhstan
Kyrgyzstan
Tajikistan (nationwide status of "language of inter-ethnic communication" defined by constitution)
non-UN member states (or without non-UN member states in the infoxbox)
Abkhazia
any lower nationwide status [show/hide]
Uzbekistan (Russian is used in notary institutions and registry offices, but this is nationwide status)
any status in dependencies or regions [show/hide]
Gagauzia and Transnistria autonomous territorial unit (Moldova)
8 communes (Romania)
Autonomous Republic of Crimea (Ukraine)
Recognised minority language [show/hide]
nationwide status by constitution or the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages
Ukraine (by constitution and by the European Charter)
Some anonymous editors keep trying to reinsert an alleged "Russo-malay"/"Russonesian" language on this page as well as the "List of pidgins, creoles, mixed languages and cants based on Indo-European languages" page. It was unsourced , so I googled it and found absolutely nothing about this alleged pidgin, so I deleted it, but someone put it back. Checking this page's history it had already been deleted by another named user before being re-inserted by an anonymous user (probably the same one). I'm posting here rather than on that page because this will probably get more responses. -
MToumbola (
talk) 11:48, 24 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Mutual intelligibility
I removed the sentence regarding MI with Ukrainian and Belarusian from the intro as it wasn't backed by any source in the article. I tried to find recent scholar articles on the subject but could not, would be great to add some.
A455bcd9 (
talk) 17:35, 26 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Hmm, there must be tons of references for that! not sure why you need recent scholar articles for a topic that is not new?
google books ...
109.122.68.162 (
talk) 12:23, 12 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Mongolia
"In 2005, Russian was the most widely taught foreign language in Mongolia, and was compulsory in Year 7 onward as a second foreign language in 2006." While true, this is incomplete and maybe misleading. Since at least 2016 (Maybe even a decade earlier), Russian has been supplanted by English. A short cited note to this effect would help the article.
Kdammers (
talk) 18:04, 13 October 2022 (UTC)reply
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
I have removed the term "post-Soviet" from the lede of this article, because it is redundant and not particularly informative: we don't say that English is spoken across the "post-British" world, because it creates a false equivalence between countries with distinct histories, of which the colonial period is only one part. At any rate, Russian gained influence in many of the countries listed _long_ before the Soviet Union was created – imo it is much better just to list the countries in question and deal with their similarities/differences in more detail elsewhere. if anyone disagrees/has comments, I'd be interested to hear.
Akakievich (
talk) 17:05, 2 May 2023 (UTC)reply
"lingua franca"
I'm also wondering about the usage of the term "lingua franca" in the lede – I think it's misleading because for many L1 Russian speakers in, for example, Ukraine, Russian is a domestic language (and in fact the national language is more associated with education and public life). Saying categorically that Russian is used as a "lingua franca" in these countries could be misleading, but I am reticent to remove the phrase entirely because it's important to convey that for some people in some post-Soviet contexts, Russian does function as a lingua franca. Maybe we should remove the "lingua franca" terminology from the existing sentence and add an additional one to explain this fact? imo the fact that Russian sees this kind of usage is significant enough to warrant sufficient explanation in the lede. Would appreciate opinions.
Akakievich (
talk) 17:08, 2 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Banned language
It is important to list countries where Russian language is banned - Ukraine, European Union, Norway, UK, Canada. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
2A02:A45E:72A7:1:DABB:C1FF:FEAC:7283 (
talk) 17:07, 6 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Russian is not banned in any of those countries (also, EU is not a country). —
Phazd (
talk|
contribs) 02:16, 7 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Russian officially banned in Ukraine, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Finnland. It's criminal offence to use it iun these countries with different penalties (for example, in Estonia - fine, and in repeating use up to 3 years of jail). In Estonia and Latvia there is a special language policy which enforce ban on Russian language.
That's an Amnesty International page from 2007, 17 years ago; things may have changed since then. It also doesn't mention the language being totally banned. The
Riigi Teataja site has
an English translation of a Language Act from 2011 which specifies that "Everyone has the right to access public administration in the Estonian language in oral or written form (hereinafter together administration) in state agencies, including the foreign representation of Estonia, local government authorities, at the notaries, bailiffs and sworn translators and their bureaus, cultural autonomy bodies and other agencies, companies, non-profit associations and foundations registered in Estonia.", so state agencies can't refuse to give you information in Estonian (e.g., in a government office, somebody has to speak Estonian), and they also offer a "Right to use language of national minority" with local governments
And no citations are given for any of those other countries treating the mere use of Russian at all being a criminal offense.
Guy Harris (
talk) 09:55, 13 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Oh yes, they changed allright - both Estonia and Latvia banned any education in Russian, including private one and banned any communication in Russian, including private life.
2A02:A45E:72A7:1:DABB:C1FF:FEAC:7283 (
talk) 16:33, 30 April 2024 (UTC)reply
That UN document - which I'm quite aware of, given that I explicitly mentioned it, giving the URL, in the comment to which you're replying - says nothing whatsoever about "[banning] any communication in Russian, including private life", only about education. But that's exactly what I said in the comment to which you're replying. If you want to convince people that greeting your friend with "Добрый день" will get you fined, you're going to have to find a reference for that; replaying that UN report is not sufficient.
It may be that the existence of the law encourages some people to take matters in their own hands, outside the law, if they hear people talking in Russian on the street, but that's another matter. That's not an indication that the law itself empowers the police to arrest people for talking in Russian on the street.
Guy Harris (
talk) 20:16, 30 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Categorization request
This discussion has been closed but implementation is still pending. Would someone be willing to remove articles from the category about territories where Russian is not an official language? Thank you.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 22:15, 7 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The map of the geographic distribution of the Russian language
@
Daniel Case:, please, explain to me why you reverted my edit. The current map is very wrong in a number of places. For example, in Ukraine. Idioma ruso.PNG is much more accurate.
Ґайдечахв74Лпадаоо (
talk) 20:59, 17 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Generally, the English name should be used.
Tropicalkitty (
talk) 21:07, 17 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Well still. The current map is very inaccurate about Ukraine, a country with the second-largest population of Russian-speakers after Russia itself. Either the current map needs fixing or it should be replaced with a different one that is more accurate.
Ґайдечахв74Лпадаоо (
talk) 21:10, 17 February 2024 (UTC)reply
I have restored that image. If anyone disagrees, feel free to remove it. I clarified the error.
Tropicalkitty (
talk) 21:37, 17 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Also yes, even the Idioma ruso.PNG map is still wrong in a number of places too. Russian is not the majority language in all of
Budjak, only in the northwestern part of it and in the city of
Izmail.
Ґайдечахв74Лпадаоо (
talk) 21:07, 17 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Are you sure this is the best image for the cover of this article?
I have nothing against the guy shown in this article who can speak Russian and Hebrew, but I see that other languages (
German,
English,
Greek) have maps of where this language is spoken in the world shown on the cover image. I don't think it is best to have a person on the cover image of a language article and this should be changed to a map of where Russian is spoken.
KeymasterOne (
talk) 15:16, 4 April 2024 (UTC)reply