This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
While I agree that Archbishop Montgomery should be mentioned on this page, he was not an Auxiliary Bishop and thus should not be on that list (at least without clarification). He was actually the Coadjutor Archbishop. He never succeeded to become Archbishop because he died before Archbishop Riordan.-- Dcheney ( talk) 02:48, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
In 2016, I anonymously noted that 2 bishops of this diocese had been coadjutors. THAT information was placed alongside the respective entries in the bishop-of-the-diocese list. The "coadjutor & auxiliaries" list has a note about that as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.102.56.186 ( talk) 20:19, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
It seems odd to have auxiliary and coadjutor bishops listed under a section titled Ordinaries, since by definition, auxiliary and coadjutor bishops are NOT ordinaries!-- Dcheney ( talk) 16:32, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
I am still doing anonymous editing, and changed this heading to "Bishops". Also, I have added other priests of this diocese who became bishops, in line with what the catholic-hierarchy site does. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.102.56.186 ( talk) 20:16, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
I have put that section back in. I used the catholic-hierarchy site for this information. For each diocese, it lists affiliated bishops, and it includes some who were not bishop of the diocese OR coadjutor OR auxiliary; it includes a bishop who served any part of his priesthood in that diocese, even if it was not as a bishop. OK?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.102.56.186 ( talk) 20:14, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Roman Catholic Archdiocese of San Francisco. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/1203179.htmWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:44, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
At first glance, the use of the Profit/Loss indicators suggests things that just aren't true. In particular, the Loss marker before 24.5% strongly suggests that the Catholic population is down by 24.5% - which is not true - it is more like 6%.-- Dcheney ( talk) 01:53, 27 August 2017 (UTC)