 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Eboshakey has tried to improve the article to widen convolution to include impulse responses of artificial reverberation devices. Popcornfud has repeatedly reverted this requesting reliable sources. I'm opening a discussion here per WP:BRD. Eboshakey is a new editor and deserves a better introduction to Wikipedia policy.
As far as the content dispute is concerned, convolution is indeed used beyond reproducing reverb of physical spaces and through the edit war, Eboshakey has provided specific examples. I assume these were rejected by Popcornfud because they were primary sources. If we can agree that these convolution applications exist, I believe we should retain Eboshakey's contributions and put a {{ citation needed}} tag on them. ~ Kvng ( talk) 15:52, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
- No, because WP:BURDEN. Please do the work and find reliable sources for information you want to include. Please don't allow this article to become yet another dumping ground of psuedo-information about music gear that never gets cited. Please don't make us do this dance yet again. Popcornfud ( talk) 18:53, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
- I did the work and found a reliable secondary source to cite this information to, and have added it to the article. Happy holidays. Popcornfud ( talk) 11:54, 28 December 2021 (UTC)