From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Biography Assessment

The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 06:08, 29 May 2007 (UTC) reply

vanity entry?

anyone else get the feeling that the user editing from 24.58.0.169 (started the article and has the largest number of edits) is Nick Sagan? Especially when you check out the other edits from that ip - all nick sagan related: his mother and his various writing credits. I don't deny that he deserves an entry - published author & screen writer, has famous parents, etc. There's just something about the tone of the entry that seems off to me. Especially the section of blurbs about his books sound like something from the bio-file or press release of a publishing company, not like a regular entry. I don't really think it's necessary in this article. Not going to do anything about it now, just wanted to point out the possibility and get some other thoughts. YggdrasilsRoot 16:24, 20 December 2006 (UTC) reply

Most of the information seems NPOV and easy to source. It's when it's not that there's a problem. — Viriditas | Talk 06:55, 29 May 2007 (UTC) reply
Frankly, fans are often more in love with a creator than the creator is with themselves. 24.95.247.110 ( talk) 00:03, 12 October 2009 (UTC) reply

Star Trek episodes

in the article about Nick's father, Carl Sagan, the Star Trek: Enterprise episode "Terra Prime" is credited to Nick Sagan. Did he write it? And did he write any other Enterprise episodes? Currently the page only lists Star Trek: TNG and Voyager episodes he has written. \ ¨ 213.89.222.42 ( talk) 01:41, 4 March 2008 (UTC) reply

There's a problem with the credit list. See for example IMDb. Viriditas ( talk) 10:52, 17 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Re: "citation needed"

The material in this article is verbatim from http://nicksagan.com/biography.html This appears to be a personal website, although I have not delved into it. (Articles composed of material largely from personal websites are against Wikipedia policy.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.145.187.67 ( talk) 20:34, 11 April 2008 (UTC) reply