This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Newark, New Jersey article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days

	Newark, New Jersey is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
	Newark, New Jersey has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
	This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on December 19, 2004.
Article milestones Date Process Result December 6, 2003 Featured article candidate Promoted December 3, 2005 Featured article review Demoted December 20, 2005 Good article nominee Listed July 7, 2009 Good article reassessment Delisted July 11, 2012 Good article nominee Listed A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the " On this day..." column on July 12, 2005. Current status: Former featured article, current good article

This   level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Cities This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles New Jersey High‑importance This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. United States Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

I made this edit for the purpose of removing excess detail from the lead. Alansohn reverted that edit. I maintain that details about the fluctuating population of the city do not belong in the lead; this information is covered in the demographics section. MonMothma ( talk) 03:49, 3 December 2023 (UTC) reply

• In the largest city in the state, details about changes in population and rankings are relevant. This material has been in the article for years and should not be removed without clear consensus for doing so. Alansohn ( talk) 13:17, 8 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Alansohn, I did not say that these demographic details are not relevant, or that they should be removed from the article. I am only saying that they do not belong in the lead (let alone the first paragraph of the lead). All of these facts are in the demographics section, and that is where they belong. The fact that they have been in the lead for a long time doesn't mean that they ought to be there. The inclusion of all these details in the lead makes it too long and unreadable. Per MOS:INTRO, "Editors should avoid lengthy paragraphs and overly specific descriptions – greater detail is saved for the body of the article". I would respectfully urge you to withdraw your objection to my edit. MonMothma ( talk) 14:03, 8 December 2023 (UTC) reply

MonMothma, you said that these details don't belong in the lead; they do, as they are specifically relevant to the size and growth of the state's largest city. The size and scope of the intro section are smaller or similar in size to those of other comparable cities. Alansohn ( talk) 11:37, 10 December 2023 (UTC) reply

MonMothma - This is one of my pet peeves on Wikipedia: excess detail in the lead. I 100% agree with you on this, and I try to cut down article leads whenever I am able to. If people want to read more about Newark, they can read the passage. Putting too much detail in the lead defeats the purpose of a lead. Asc85 ( talk) 00:57, 15 December 2023 (UTC) reply

• Details about populations changes are covered in appropriate section and not needed in lead. Djflem ( talk) 21:54, 15 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Suggestion: you may want to move the list of theatres to a separate article, similar to List of theatres in Louisville, Kentucky. The list seems to overwhelm an already long article. Stefen Tower_{s among the rest!} ^{Gab • Gruntwerk} 21:52, 9 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Added the Central Planning Board into the article 3/4/2024... Under GOVERNMENT after POLITICAL CORRUPTION...

The following inclusion to the Government section was created with research. A Wikipedia member indicates "Not the place to add all this" and reverted the work. Can someone identify where to include this? Or please modify it as it is current events of the City and how they are dealing for the city or against the community.

Actually, Special:Contributions/74.88.107.15, most/all of this content does not belong in the encyclopedia at all. Sorry. Please take a look at WP:EXCESSDETAIL and WP:RELIABILITY, which should explain why. MonMothma ( talk) 03:13, 5 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Can you use some of the material or make it concise? 74.88.107.15 ( talk) 03:27, 5 March 2024 (UTC) reply

START OF EDIT WORK...

Central Planning Board

The City of Newark has a central planning board consisting of seven board members and four alternates. ^[1] The planning board is part of the Office of Planning and Zoning in the Department of Economic and Housing Development located at City Hall. ^[2] The planning board has followed a masterplan ^[3] for redevelopment of Newark's land use called Newark360 as of September 26, 2023. The planning board must follow the City Master Plan and ordinances of the City of Newark in regards to the Municipal Land Use Law, NJSA 40:55D. ^[4] The board reviews the City of Newark Official Map and follows the ordinances of zoning. They provide variances for building projects upon site plan reviews with development applicants and hear the public on projects through online Zoom meetings ^[5]. These plans for final approvals are sent to the Newark Municipal Council.

The planning board is handling more development applications in a building boom for development and having controversial projects to approve or deny. On February 2023, the proposed 45-Story Arc Tower with 522 feet would be one of the tallest residential buildings approved, but with opposition and previously rejected by the Newark’s Landmarks & Historic Preservation Commission a year earlier. ^[6] On March 2023, the Central Planning Board denied an applicant by Wu-Tang Clan's Raekwon for a cannabis lounge in the Downtown District. ^[7] Another project in June 2023 with 300 community members and organizations against the Central Planning Board were mute as a zoning change was voted 7-0 in favor of a redevelopment zones for City Council approval. ^[8] In November 21, 2023, the City of Newark Municipal Council approved creating a second zoning board of adjustment, for one year term, to handle the backlog of developer projects and deal with the backlog. ^[9]

The following are the members of the 2024 Zoning Board with external background: ^[10]

• Charles Auffant | Chairman (Commissioner on the Newark Zoning Board of Adjustment since 1997. Clinical Professor of Law. Community and Transactional Lawyering Clinic, Clinical attorney in the Urban League Clinic.) ^[11])
• Julius S. Montford | Vice Chair (Human Resources Labor Relations Manager, City of Newark, Director of Essex County Division of Training and Employment) ^[12]
• Sharon Hardesty (Vice President at Santander Bank since 1988.) ^[13]
• Charles N. Hall, Jr. (President of Retail Wholesale Department Store Union Local 108) ^[14]
• David Comesañas (Consultant) ^[15]
• Robin Jones (Senior Director, House Management New Jersey Performing Arts Center) ^[16]
• Luis Ribeiro (Journeyman Ironworker Transcontinental Steel) ^[17]
• Katiria Cobian (Serving since 2014. ^[18] LCSW-Licensed Clinical Social Worker, Non-Profit Organization North Newark Move.) ^[19]
• Rosa Torres-Zajkowski (Alternate #4 since March 2023 until March 2025) ^[20]
• Jackie Coombs-Hollis (Planning Department Title: Land Use Administrator of Livingston, New Jersey) ^[21]

The members of the planning board must live in the City of Newark as residents and are appointed by the Municipal Council. Board member, Katiria Cobian, was under investigation in July 2023 for potential living in Harrison, New Jersey during the board meetings, invalidating some decisions with legal situations towards the City upon denials or approvals of plans. ^[22] The members are not able to have positions in the City nor be elective officials of the city government and serve a four year term. Compensation for member services is done at $166 per meeting and at $250 per each special meetings. The annually meetings are approximately 30 and/or 10 special meetings. ^[23]

END OF EDIT WORK...

The inclusion of this material is because Newark had not done anything about zoning in 40 years and noticed a surge that both the community and organization see the Central Planning Board's purpose. https://rpa.org/work/reports/newark-draft-vision-plan — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.88.107.15 ( talk) 03:26, 5 March 2024 (UTC) reply