From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleMarvin Gaye was one of the Music good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 9, 2005 Peer reviewReviewed
January 2, 2006 Good article nomineeListed
November 8, 2006 Good article reassessmentDelisted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the " On this day..." column on April 1, 2020, and April 1, 2023.
Current status: Delisted good article

Reference #4 is a dead link

Footnote 4 points to a dead link — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.239.201.125 ( talk) 19:55, 2 April 2016 (UTC) reply

Possible copyright infringement

After a simple tool test, it seems that this article reads similar to gotradio.com. Here is the link. More reasonable, in my opinion, is the prospect that gotradio copied Wikipedia. In a scramble to get content, whoever manages the site may have copy/pasted whatever was a top search result. MgWd ( talk)MgWd —Preceding undated comment added 04:06, 13 September 2016 (UTC) reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Marvin Gaye. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:59, 4 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Section RE: Death

Not sure if anyone else feels this way, but I am wondering if the section titled "Death" might be better if moved towards the bottom of the page? It just feels like it is out of order to me? Just wanted to ask before I went moving things. Tattoodwaitress ( talk) 22:46, 17 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Nomination of Portal:Marvin Gaye for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether Portal:Marvin Gaye is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The page will be discussed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Marvin Gaye until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the page during the discussion, including to improve the page to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the deletion notice from the top of the page. North America 1000 06:40, 23 April 2019 (UTC) reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 13:38, 11 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Personal Life

I added some basics about Gaye's marriages and children, and linked to the separate Wikipedia article about his rather turbulent personal travails. My edits, which I spent considerable time putting together and properly sourcing, were undone with the contention that "a separate article addresses his personal life" (paraphrasing). Yes, it does, and I linked to it, but that is hardly reason to omit basic details of his personal life in the "personal life" section of his biography on Wikipedia.

‎If we have a "personal life" section, it ought to cover the basics of his personal life. The fact that it is covered more in depth in a separate Wikipedia article is no reason to skip it here. The information I added is very basic, and would belong in the "personal life" section of any Wikipedia biography. Matza Pizza ( talk) 09:57, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

What you wrote is not really of encyclopedic value in this article, includes what is effectively personal commentary, and your sources are poor and incompletely formatted. So, this article is better as it was before. Please see if you gain any support on this page before attempting to re-add it. Thanks. Ghmyrtle ( talk) 10:44, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply
I agree with Ghmyrtle. This gossip-style content is not of encyclopedic value, and cites of the New York Post have no place on Wikipedia, see WP:NYPOST: "It is A tabloid newspaper, editors criticise its lack of concern for fact-checking or corrections, including a number of examples of outright fabrication." Using unformatted bare urls as refs is not good, either. Carlstak ( talk) 13:16, 21 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Attempted biopics

Someone may want to add something regarding this project : Sexual Healing - IMDB, Playbill reference, " What happened to Jesse L. Martin’s Marvin Gaye Film?". The film was never completed. I heard through the grapevine that what was shot is one the assets of a bankrupt European producer and that the receiver of the bankrupcy would have made attempts to sell the project to someone to finish. 194.42.220.72 ( talk) 15:09, 15 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Showing "Marvin Gaye" at beginning of lead

Since "Marvin Gaye" was how the subject presented himself in the entertainment industry, that constitutes his stage name, and in my judgment, needs to presented in total at the beginning of the lead. This is how the world knew of him and thus WP:COMMONNAME applies to the article time, so I don't see why this doesn't apply to the lead as well. Using language like "who also spelled his surname as Gaye" appears to minimize his use of this name, like it's not key. We currently have two editors to one who prefer to use the text "better known as Marvin Gaye", which seems to be the common way to show stage names in articles. That the first name is repeated doesn't seem to be wrong in particular. Stefen Towers among the rest! GabGruntwerk 22:53, 22 February 2024 (UTC) reply

SNUGGUMS, Jpgordon - If we can't figure out a way to resolve this, I would be open to an RFC and would accept the results. What do you both think? Stefen Towers among the rest! GabGruntwerk 22:56, 22 February 2024 (UTC) reply
No RFC is needed, and calling "Gaye" a stage name is misleading when that incorrectly implies he went by something not derived from legal identity. It's not like how Paul Hewson is known as Bono or the way Carlos Estevez uses the alias of Charlie Sheen. Both of those guys took on something completely different from their formal names unlike Marvin here. The fact that you still advocate for using first name more than once in opening sentence also confirms my suspicions that you simply don't care how repetitive that is. Regardless, the article title using the "e" spelling already makes it obvious what he was "better known as". SNUGGUMS ( talk / edits) 01:50, 23 February 2024 (UTC) reply
You have me correct on something - I actually do not care at all that the subject's first name is repeated. I also don't know your reason for objecting to it beyond you expressing a displeasure about it. Do you know of a guideline that is violated by the repeating? Also, more particular to the discussion here is that I don't think you are considering that the language you have chosen minimizes the name "Marvin Gaye" that he is known the world over for. It's not simply another surname for the subject - it's the name he put on his albums, performances, etc. It is indeed a stage name. Stefen Towers among the rest! GabGruntwerk 01:57, 23 February 2024 (UTC) reply
On the contrary, going by an alternate spelling for albums, performances, or anything else isn't the same thing as using a very different name from your legal identity. You're still misusing the term "stage name" and shouldn't keep conflating this with mere spelling variations. As for the comment on how my change "minimizes" the informal spelling, that's a stretch when readers can figure out on their own how he used this along with "Gay" without an "e" attached by looking at the article title and seeing how similar the names are spelled. It's not like I tried to change the page's name to omit the "e". SNUGGUMS ( talk / edits) 02:18, 23 February 2024 (UTC) reply
"Marvin Gaye", no matter how you want to describe it, is a stage name. That a stage name cannot be similar to one's real name seems to have no basis, or at least you have not made a case based in a guideline. Also, this isn't about what the reader can figure out - it is the use of text that conveys an inaccuracy - that 'Gaye' is merely a different surname the subject used in the field of work they were famous for. "Marvin Gaye" is by far the predominant name he used in his career, so acting like it's just another name he used is insufficient. Stefen Towers among the rest! GabGruntwerk 02:31, 23 February 2024 (UTC) reply
I've found one source saying he legally changed his name, but I don't really trust it, and there's no corroboration elsewhere. How did he sign checks? What did his driver's license say? Did he continue to use the name "Gay" at all, or did he drop it completely? --jpgordon 𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 02:56, 23 February 2024 (UTC) reply
I was going by the assumption based on our article content and anything I've ever known about him that he used 'Gaye' for his act. If there was a legal name change, it seems we would have covered that by now. The article does show his death certificate with last name spelled "Gaye" but it also apparently misspells his middle name -- so those could be just inaccuracies. If we can find reliable sources that show he changed his name, that would certainly affect how we address this, but in the meantime, "better known as Marvin Gaye" seems to cover what we need for now. Stefen Towers among the rest! GabGruntwerk 03:27, 23 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Hey, look at what I found. His passport. In the name "Marvin Gaye". Signed "Marvin Gaye". [1]. So there's an answer to one of my questions; he used Gaye onstage and on official documents. --jpgordon 𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 05:20, 23 February 2024 (UTC) reply
In our own stage name article, it says "Some people take a stage name because their real name ... projects an undesired image". He did it (per this article) "to silence rumors of his sexuality, and to put more distance between himself and his father." Stefen Towers among the rest! GabGruntwerk 02:48, 23 February 2024 (UTC) reply

StefenTower is trying too hard to justify treating slight discrepancies as "stage names". It's also completely absurd to say it "conveys and inaccuracy" to go with "also spelled his surname as". The reality is this shows how multiple spellings were used. If the "Gaye is a stage name for Gay" logic were true, then Dave Matthews as an example would've been counted as one simply for the minor difference of using the informal "Dave" nickname for "David". See how absurd this would sound? Contrast it with someone like Shawn Carter who goes by Jay-Z, Yaneisha Franklin being known as Sasha Go Hard, Elizabeth Grant having the stage name Lana Del Ray, or (going closer to legal identity) Alicia Cook using the alias Alicia Keys. As for the passport bit Jpgordon mentioned, that helps support what I thought of him using it as an alternate spelling. This isn't simply something used for musical endeavors. It also shows he didn't drop the middle name when adopting the version with an E. SNUGGUMS ( talk / edits) 06:11, 23 February 2024 (UTC) reply

First off, it seems you are frequently straying away from WP:AGF in our discussions, seemingly making accusations over such a minor matter as a single sentence in an article. I have not been cross toward you on this matter - it's OK to disagree without being disagreeable. I have only disagreed with your position, but you seem to be operating in attack mode. It's not the wiki way.
Anyway, whether Marvin Gaye is a stage name or what became his legal name, either way, that's how he's known to the general public. Treating it like it's a sometimes alternative surname belies the marquee aspect of only one name, Marvin Gaye. The way it is stated now gives a false impression to the reader. Stefen Towers among the rest! GabGruntwerk 06:29, 23 February 2024 (UTC) reply
By the way, I will be starting an RFC because it does seem we're not getting any closer to an agreement, and we already practically have a third opinion by way of recent edits. So, RFC is the next step. With some fresh, cooler heads, we may be able to sort this all out. Stefen Towers among the rest! GabGruntwerk 06:35, 23 February 2024 (UTC) reply
My stance wasn't supposed to come off as an attack. If it did, then I apologize. I either way couldn't fathom why you'd treat small differences for names as being bigger than they were. What I went with most certainly does NOT give "a false impression to the reader", though; the truth is I simply indicated that he used "Gay" both with and without an E. When it doesn't look like anything got altered for first/middle names, it felt most efficient to only list them once in opening sentence. I still find RFC to be unnecessary when that would just drag this out for longer than it needs to be. SNUGGUMS ( talk / edits) 06:42, 23 February 2024 (UTC) reply
"is trying too hard to justify" reads "attack-y". :) I'm not arguing for fun here, as your responses seem to suggest. I am serious about my claim.
At any rate, we obviously keep talking past each other, and that's why an RFC would be a good idea. You are very focused on the aspect of the minor name difference between 'Gay' and 'Gaye'. I see that. But it's also not the point. The point is he is widely known as Marvin Gaye, not widely known as Marvin Pentz Gay Jr. or Marvin Gay. The current language makes these names appear equivalent, and they are decidedly not. He likely never got on the stage as "Marvin Gay". Stefen Towers among the rest! GabGruntwerk 06:51, 23 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Why not simply use a format like Marvin Gaye (born Marvin Pentz Gay Jr. .....)  ?? Ghmyrtle ( talk) 08:47, 23 February 2024 (UTC) reply
If the primary sources that have turned up are considered good enough to show he legally changed his name early in his career, then that solution makes perfect sense. (a more definitive legal name change document or secondary sources would seal the deal on that approach, I think.) However, if Marvin Gaye wasn't his legal name, then it's a performing name, although still the name by which he is famous, and the above discussion is about how to handle that. Stefen Towers among the rest! GabGruntwerk 09:06, 23 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Ghmyrtle, since he never legally dropped his middle name or suffix as far as I can tell, the format you propose would be misleading. The fact that memorial tributes for him were called "Marvin Gaye Jr. Memorial Scholarship Fund Day" and "Marvin P. Gaye Jr. Memorial Foundation" suggests those always remained part of his identity, as does having a son named Marvin III. SNUGGUMS ( talk / edits) 13:05, 23 February 2024 (UTC) reply
The current version is unduly wordy. Another, better, option would be: Marvin Pentz Gay Jr. (April 2, 1939 – April 1, 1984), known professionally as Marvin Gaye... Perhaps the way forward is to list all the possible options and see which one commands most support and complies best with existing guidance. Ghmyrtle ( talk) 14:32, 23 February 2024 (UTC) reply
So does the fact that his passport says "MARVIN PENTZ GAYE" of any import here? It's pretty strong evidence that he presented himself that way to officaldom. --jpgordon 𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 15:14, 23 February 2024 (UTC) reply

The passport does help corroborate how the middle name stayed in place. Using "known professionally as" incorrectly implies he took on something not part of legal identity (it would be a stretch to say the E counts as a different name altogether), plus it needlessly repeats first name. SNUGGUMS ( talk / edits) 15:19, 23 February 2024 (UTC) reply

I browsed newspapers.com last night and saw mentions of Gaye changing his name at the beginning of his career, but I never saw phrasing like "legally changed". But perhaps the combo of his passport and death certificate, along with secondary source mentions of "changed his name" would be good enough to suffice. So the question then becomes "How do we present this as his legal name?". At the very least, IMHO, it should not be presented as a secondary thing, especially as Marvin Gaye is the name he is widely known for. It should be the primary name. Stefen Towers among the rest! GabGruntwerk 21:56, 23 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Something like: Marvin Pentz Gaye Jr. (born Marvin Pentz Gay Jr.; April 2, 1939 – April 1, 1984), who performed as Marvin Gaye, was an American singer and songwriter. -- yes, it repeats name words, but I can't see how this approach is forbidden. Of course, if this can be stated with greater word economy, and also doesn't take away the prominence of his performing name, I can be fine with that. Stefen Towers among the rest! GabGruntwerk 22:10, 23 February 2024 (UTC) Stefen Towers among the rest! GabGruntwerk 22:10, 23 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Alternative: Marvin Pentz Gaye Jr. (April 2, 1939 – April 1, 1984), who performed as Marvin Gaye, was an American singer and songwriter. -- we could reserve display/discussion of birth name for the infobox and article prose. Stefen Towers among the rest! GabGruntwerk 22:19, 23 February 2024 (UTC) reply
For what it's worth, I did see pieces like these discussing the fatal 1984 shooting which use E spelling for both Marvin Jr. and surprisingly Marvin Sr. as well. Not entirely sure whether that's a typo for the latter or a sign of him adopting the same spelling. If the E version was meant to be a permanent change (this would explain why Marvin III and his other kids also have it) and it's not a case of alternate usage akin to Michael Jackson using both "Joe" and the more formal "Joseph" as middle names for different things (which had been my impression before this thread began), then I recommend going with "Marvin Pentz Gaye Jr. (née Gay; April 2, 1939 – April 1, 1984)" when there's no credible evidence any first/middle name changes. It wouldn't downplay anything about him or have any name redundancies. SNUGGUMS ( talk / edits) 23:06, 23 February 2024 (UTC) reply
"né Gay", of course. Or rather,  Gay. I'd like to see some evidence of him using "Gaye Jr.". --jpgordon 𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 01:03, 24 February 2024 (UTC) reply
I thought it already was obvious that he did based on those links and the fact that posthumous tributes to him that I mentioned earlier (and discussed within "Awards and honors" section) use it in their titles. Furthermore, without him keeping the suffix, his namesake son couldn't possibly have had III as a suffix.
Oh yeah. --jpgordon 𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 04:33, 24 February 2024 (UTC) reply

So, does the above (most recent replies) mean we have agreement on writing the following: "Marvin Pentz Gaye Jr. (  Gay; April 2, 1939 – April 1, 1984), who performed as Marvin Gaye, was an American singer and songwriter."? Of course, we can fill in cites wherever needed in due course. Stefen Towers among the rest! GabGruntwerk 20:30, 24 February 2024 (UTC) reply

No. We don't need the "who performed as" at all. That will be obvious by (a) the article title, (b) the infobox, and (c) every other reference in the article. --jpgordon 𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 00:15, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Well, the first sentence sets the tone, and if we're starting with effectively calling him Marvin Gaye Jr., that could throw off readers genuinely new to the topic. "who performed as Marvin Gaye" gives a primary explanation for the article title and infobox uses. Stefen Towers among the rest! GabGruntwerk 00:18, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Hardly necessary. We don't say "Francis Albert Sinatra, who performed as Frank Sinatra". We don't say "John Joseph Nicholson, who performed as Jack Nicholson". --jpgordon 𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 00:31, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
I certainly see your point but "Jr." creates the issue the lead should resolve. The subject never presented himself as "Jr." in the entertainment business. The examples you gave are straightaway name conversions. We don't have that in this case. Stefen Towers among the rest! GabGruntwerk 00:37, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply
Why is that an issue at all? It doesn't seem to be a difficulty at Marlon Brando, Will Smith, Robert Redford, Burt Reynolds, Clint Eastwood, Bill Cosby... --jpgordon 𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 01:15, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply

In all honesty, his suffix isn't a problem at all and there's nothing wrong with the opening sentence maintaining that. Jpgordon's rationale for why we don't need the "who performed as" bit is 100% correct, and the examples given on Sinatra and Nicholson convey my exact thoughts for the matter. SNUGGUMS ( talk / edits) 02:31, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply

OK, for the sake of a solution for now, leave out that clause, and I reserve the right to RFC the whole lot (including Brando and the rest) later. I think that aspect is worth a community discussion on the grounds I have already laid out. Stefen Towers among the rest! GabGruntwerk 02:52, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply