This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Fashion Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Horn-rimmed glasses needs to be Wikified! So here's what needs to be done:
Check if the article is a copyright violation or meets deletion criteria.	✔ check
Suggestion: Do a quick Google or Yahoo! search with a sentence from the article.
Check if another article already exists on this subject.	✔ check
Suggestion: Use the Wikipedia search to see what comes up.
Add Wikipedia markup.	✔ check
Suggestion: Read up on m:Help:Editing.
Format the article.	✔ check
Suggestion: Read up on Guide to Layout and Manual of Style.
Remove the {{ wikify}} tag (if there is one).	✔ check
Join the Wikification effort! • How to use this template

I think this started before the early 2000s. In fact, I got a pair in about '93-'94 (the sort of half-round style) that I intentionally selected because I wanted to look artsily hip. (I live(d) in the US, BTW.) There were lots of other, similar pairs in the same store, too. I think it's probably more the case that, after being considered super dorky and grandma-ish starting some point after their era of mass popularity ('50s and '60s) - say, maybe in the '70s through '80s - they finally began to be accepted again in an artsy/hipster sort of way around the extreme late '80s/early '90s, and the trend has continued to trickle down to the mainstream ever since, with smaller dips and peaks along the way. I think their revival might have started earlier in Europe than in the US, too - sort of the same as with boot-cut jeans, clunky shoes for women, etc. that all became big in a mainstream way in the '90s. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.45.108.91 ( talk) 21:00, 13 January 2012 (UTC) reply

An image used in this article, File:Hlloyd2.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Hlloyd2.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 16:59, 2 March 2012 (UTC) reply

This article never really defines what constitutes horm-rimmed glasses. You can kind of get the idea that they are glasses with a non-metallic frame from the article but it never diectly states this or gives guidelines for what does or doesn't count as "horn-rimmed." -- Ericjs ( talk) 04:01, 31 December 2014 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Horn-rimmed glasses. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081028204353/http://www.seikoeyewear.com/CE/CECourse.cfm?ceID=6 to http://www.seikoeyewear.com/CE/CECourse.cfm?ceID=6

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:57, 6 November 2017 (UTC) reply