 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 August 2019 and 11 December 2019. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Dianasam1109.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 22:14, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
BellaDina.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 23:13, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Should this article be renamed? The term that is in favor Nowadays and is arguably more PC is "Clinical Laboratory Science," but I'm going to leave that descision to people more experienced than I . Medical technology has developed quite a lot of stuff which makes our lives more easier or at times harder. Things like surgeries, if not done well can have a really bad effect which can depress you for the rest of your life
This page should be linked/joined with Biomedical engineering. In my opinion the list of applications in this page is far too short and the field is progressing very rapidly nowadays. Also, links to pharmacy faculties shouldn't be on the page. user:193.167.242.101
- I agree with you. Ecoman24 (talk page) 19:31, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
together w/ his brother
the b —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.211.248.205 ( talk) 17:34, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
I have a suggestion to possibly add Healthcare startups as a redirect that goes here and add some info on healthcare startups to this page. Currently there is no good wiki article on this topic afaik. Shaded0 ( talk) 19:23, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
- @
Shaded0: Hi. I am new to Wikipedia. What would be some examples of healthcare startups? I'd be open to working on this together so that I may build my experience within Wikipedia.
ThaiTee (
talk) 21:27, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
- I think there are several examples that could be found. There's also different "kinds" ie. healthcare insurance, wearables, monitoring, personal health coach, etc. Per starting a new page on this - make sure to create this in a sandbox page until the page is "finished" to publish. See, Help:Sandbox_tutorial
- Here's a few articles to get started. Note: you may run into paywall with some news sites.
- Happy to help out if you need it. :) Shaded0 ( talk) 16:41, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Health technology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090526014500/http://www.inahta.org/HTA/Glossary/ to http://www.inahta.org/HTA/Glossary/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:57, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Looks like there might be a need for a global health technology article (currently redirects here). II | ( t - c) 02:00, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- It was meant to be a global article, but someone moved it to the more specific title because it was insufficiently inclusive of other perspectives. The result was some strange redirects. I've moved it back. The article needs to be expanded. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 19:28, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
This seems odd. I am looking at the Artificial intelligence in healthcare page. AI is a technology. It is not a special thing, it is just a technology. So shouldn't the AI page be merged into this one? This page is older, so it seems that this page should have the AI page merged into it.
On the other hand, the AI page gets more love. Both of these pages show many edits in the last year or so, but the AI page shows more edits overall, even though this is older. Is it just the AI aficionados who are driving this? I cannot tell.
But it does seem very duplicative to have two big pages, one being "AI in healthcare" and another being "Health technology in the United States". Unless the AI article should be merged into a "Health technology" page that is not US-specific. Because, after all, none of these is a US-only topic. So. It is not clear. Any thoughts? RayKiddy ( talk) 18:27, 12 May 2020 (UTC)