This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Environmental movement article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To-do list for Environmental movement:
|
The contents of the Eco-imperialism page were merged into Environmental movement. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 August 2020 and 12 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jbooogi.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 20:43, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
The material on James Lovelock is pertinent, but I agree, needs sourcing. Please document references. Thanks, DA Sonnenfeld ( talk) 14:13, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
99.181.143.157 ( talk) 06:50, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for efforts to globalize this article. In it's current, more geographically diverse form, some article restructuring is needed, in my opinion. After the article lead, it now jumps right in to environmentalism in the U.S. Before it does so, though, some broader, definitional elaboration would be helpful, such as the material currently later in the article on 'scope of the movement'. Kind regards, DA Sonnenfeld ( talk) 10:46, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
Two different names; same movement DA Sonnenfeld ( talk) 17:47, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
I agree, it's two names for the same movement Gor ( talk) 07:21, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
I can see certain people wanting to distinguish a narrower "ecology movement" from the broader "environmental movement," but as it stands I see complete overlap between the two articles. I'm for the merge. Karmos ( talk) 05:35, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
In the text it states: Deep Ecology is an ideological spinoff of the ecology movement that views the diversity and integrity of the planetary ecosystem, in and for itself, as its primary value.
Can we add: Followers of this ideology can be called deep green environmentalists ?
In the Deep green environmentalism article, we can then put the following: Similar to dark greens, "deep greens" put most of the blame of the current environmental problems on the industry, and also follow an anti-consumerist ideology. For individuals, they advocate adopting a simple/low-tech lifestyle, yet accept using green technologies whenever this is not possible. They also follow a non-anthropocentric environmental ideology. They also believe that the collapse of the current society, due to environmental difficulties, is at hand and thus also prepare for this collapse.
81.242.248.237 ( talk) 09:13, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
neutrality of critisism is really quetionable — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.167.146.26 ( talk) 15:40, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
I feel as though this section forgot to mention many critics that pertain to the Environmental Movement for example: to being with in the Intro- the role of colonialism, capitalism, and corporations in environmental effects. I agree with the remarks on the neutrality of the criticisms of U.S. environmental movements because elitism of U.S. environmental projects is not addressed, and how U.S. environmental movements too often fail to address how environmental issues directly affect indigenous people in the U.S. and globally because of the property they reside on, something also referred to as environmental racism. The fact that even if the U.S. and other countries sign global environmental treaties they do not implement these guidelines, or how sometimes countries don't even sing these treaties such as China is not mentioned. It should be noted on the Latin America section that in recent years a crisis of murders of environmental activist has rose such as the case in Honduras with Berta Caceres and also in Asian countries. The book “First Along the River” serves as a brief history of U.S. environmental movement and elitism. Democracynow.org and TeleSurTv.net can offer some insight into the surge of killings of environmental activist, on Democracynow.org you can find a report called <ref>“How Many More? 116 Environmental Defenders Were Murdered Last Year, Mostly in Latin America” <ref> ( Marimara93 ( talk) 23:56, 18 September 2016 (UTC) )
user:Gravuritas gave some terms while editing. (see Edit History) I googled "Rag & bone environment", I found this: [1] & with "responsible care management system", this: [2]. Not sure if it is the right content. (I might add it when I have time. You can add it if you want...) -- Petorial ( talk) 03:52, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
I performed the merge. Very little was salvageable material—either unsourced or unsourced and biased. I'd encourage those who are interested to look back at the version of the ecology movement page and rework and find sources for unsourced material. Karmos ( talk) 06:14, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
Environmental movement. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers. — cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 05:39, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
"The Society attracted growing support from the suburban middle-classes and influenced the passage of the Sea Birds Preservation Act in 1869". That's interesting because the Society was formed (as The Plumage League) only 20 years latter (February 1889). אביהו ( talk) 10:03, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Environmental movement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:24, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Why is it that we let the world face a threat we've been known was coming for more than 100 years. Can the world come together to survive together? Jorgedmngz5 ( talk) 07:22, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I propose merging Environmental movement into Environmentalism. I think the content in the movement can easily be explained in the context of "environmentalism", and a merger would not cause any article-size or weighting problems in Environmentalism. FatalSubjectivities FatalSubjectivities ( talk) 13:20, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
"diverse"range of movements; which is basically what the article "environmentalism" already does. If "environmental movement" isn't discussing a specific movement, then it serves no real purpose. Jargo Nautilus ( talk) 13:34, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 17 January 2023 and 17 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Enina24 ( article contribs). Peer reviewers: KeeLgd, Marcplummer82.
— Assignment last updated by Marcplummer82 ( talk) 00:20, 31 March 2023 (UTC)