This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Electric Light Orchestra article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 14 days

This   level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Musicians This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as High-importance). Birmingham High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Birmingham, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Birmingham on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BirminghamWikipedia:WikiProject BirminghamTemplate:WikiProject BirminghamBirmingham articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. England Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Rock music High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. West Midlands High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject West Midlands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of West Midlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.West MidlandsWikipedia:WikiProject West MidlandsTemplate:WikiProject West MidlandsWest Midlands articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

I've started a new category for fans, just type the following at the bottom of your user page {Category:Wikipedians who listen to Electric Light Orchestra}. The Equaliser 12:00 October 2006 (UTC)

Much as a I love them both, recent additions about Mik Kaminski and Kelly Groucutt are not merited.

Firstly, the cite used to support Kaminski's inclusion involves Dhani Harrison failing to even name-check him. This does not demonstrate he is a principal member. If anything it does the exact opposite.

Secondly, if we are to credit Groucutt with "co-lead vocals", we need a good source that does this. Listing tours he was on does not do this, if anything it is original synthesis, which is not permissible. While Groucutt's backing vocals was a feature of ELO, and he was lead singer on the occasional song, I don't think we'll find any source calling him "co-lead vocalist". -- Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 17:16, 25 June 2020 (UTC) reply

I can respect that line of thinking. It's a shame Jeff almost never discusses these things, and if Bev, Mik, Lou, or or the others give interviews nowadays, I can't find them. Leads to a serious lack of clarity, and makes it hard to credit anyone besides the 'core three' of Jeff, Bev, and Richard for anything. Thanks for the explanation. BlaccKat ( talk) 04:10, 29 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Why is it even listed like this? Why "Principal members" not "Current members" and "Former members" like every other band page? What makes this band different that the members need to be listed in an extremely irregular way? Besides I would hardly call someone who was in a band that's lasted 51 years for just 2 years a "Principal member" when the band has had 49 years without him. That's like calling Tim "Ripper" Owens a "principal member" of Judas Priest or Blaze Bayley as "principal member" of Iron Maiden which are obviously ridiculous claims to make. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.93.94.108 ( talk) 20:16, 6 August 2022 (UTC) reply

It's like because that's what contributes to this article have settled on. There is a separate article for members of the band, so this section should really only be a summary of that. I'm not convinced that what's there currently is the best way of doing that. What suggestions do you have?

Your change has now been reverted three times and you are edit warring. I strongly advise you to reach consensus for any change before you continue editing the article. -- Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 16:41, 7 August 2022 (UTC) reply

My point is what makes Roy Wood for instance a "Principal member" exactly? He was only in the band from 1970–1972. That is only 2 years and he only contributed to 2 studio albums. The band has been around for 51 years and have released 15 studio albums. Roy Wood's contributions don't even make up 10% of the band's history. There are 11 members who have been in the band longer and contributed to more albums than Roy yet Roy gets listed as a "Principal member" and listed with the current members on the main band article despite not being a member since 1972 while the others don't and are hidden away in a separate article. What is the logic in this bizarre system? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.93.94.108 ( talk) 15:36, 8 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Presumably because Wood was a founding member, co-lead and song-writer. Something that none of the others can claim except Lynne. -- Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 17:03, 8 August 2022 (UTC) reply

So how come Dave Mustaine isn't listed with the current members of Metallica? He fits all of those criteria. Oh yeah because he's not a current member so he gets listed in the former members section! How come there's no "Principal members" section for any other band? Why is ELO the only band on Wikipedia that has a "Principal band members" section? Why can't they have members listed in former and current like every other band? Why should members who have made far more contributions be hidden in a separate article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.93.94.108 ( talk) 14:55, 9 August 2022 (UTC) reply

What works for the Metallica article is not really the point. This article is not the only article to have this section. The section is a summary of a pretty comprehensive article that was moved out of the main article, most likely for reasons of its size. No-one is "hidden", most are mentioned in full within this article. -- Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 16:09, 9 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Again that doesn't answer my very simple question.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.93.94.108 ( talk) 17:51, 10 August 2022 (UTC) reply

No one owes you an answer. You want to change the article, the onus is on you to suggest how you would improve it. -- Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 09:05, 12 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Umm yes they do owe me an answer. I've found a serious flaw with something in the article and no one can explain why it's that way despite no other article on Wikipedia doing it the same way. No the onus is on you to suggest why this bizarre way of listing members is better than Wikipedia's standard version that all other band articles in existence use.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.93.94.108 ( talk) 15:50, 19 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Again, this is not the only article to use this. And I hardly class this as a serious flaw. Please suggest how you would summarise the List_of_Electric_Light_Orchestra_members article differently. -- Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 16:28, 19 August 2022 (UTC) reply

The problem with noting "snubbed" members of ELO who were not inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame, is that it's hard to do without suggesting the opinion that they should have been. And unless the article lists all the other members, it's also suggesting the opinion that some members deserve to be inducted, while others do not. The term "definitive lineup" also introduces the opinion about which lineup is "definitive". Either way, I think the lead should be focussed on how the band was recognised, rather than perceived disputes about which band members got invited. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 10:38, 24 April 2023 (UTC) reply

That's not an opinion piece, it was the official Rock & Roll Hall of Fame write-up as taken from their 2017 Induction Ceremony Program about ELO or Electric Light Orchestra history. The so-called article does list all other members earlier on that same page, Mike De Albuquerque, Wilf Gibson, Mike Edwards and Colin Walker. TrekkiELO ( talk) 19:02, 24 April 2023 (UTC) reply

The specific issue is that the opinion of who constitutes the definitive lineup is not supported by the cited sources. If there really was notable induction drama (which does sometimes happen!), then the right approach is to find an independent third-party source that discusses this, without requiring editors to draw their own connections. Orange Suede Sofa ( talk) 19:28, 24 April 2023 (UTC) reply

The official Rock & Roll Hall of Fame write-up says nothing about anyone being excluded from induction. The website https://futurerocklegends.com does have a list, but it appears to be devoted to suggesting everyone previously in a band ever has been "snubbed". It offers no insights, discussion, quotes from anyone involved, or even opinions of its own. It's not a good source. If you have some better sources that make a point of mentioning this, and it's clear that any notable people had an issue one way or another, then it might be suitable for inclusion in the relevant section lower down in the article. Otherwise, it looks like this is being constructed on the article as original synthesis. It certainly doesn't belong in the lead. -- Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 11:58, 25 April 2023 (UTC) reply

There are liner notes where the "magnificent seven" line-up is highlighted as being what archivists and fans alike agree on as the definitive version of ELO, or at least it's the specific group that was responsible for its commercial peak. TrekkiELO ( talk) 22:20, 25 April 2023 (UTC) reply

I don't doubt it, but the question is should the lead be discussing their omission from the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame, especially if the source doesn't. -- Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 10:17, 28 April 2023 (UTC) reply