This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
The article quoted a fire return interval of lodgepole forests in Yosemite at 764 years. This is almost certainly way too high, and is unsupported by any references that I have seen, as well as my personal observations and data collections. I removed that figure and re-worded the paragraph to make it more coherent in its comparisons with other forest types and Rocky Mtn lodgepole forests.
Jeeb 16:58, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
This article should be titled "Biology of the Central Western Sierra Nevada" or "Yosemite Park". Although a disclaimer exists within the article, it should have more contributions before it can be labeled just 'Sierra Nevada'. East side ecology should be provided as well; I will see if I can get contributors for this.
It seems odd that the article is called the "biology" of the Sierra Nevada. Wouldn't "ecology" be more appropriate? If there are no protests, I'll move it to Ecology of the Sierra Nevada. -- Ci e lomobile talk / contribs 02:46, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
Editors here may be best able to evaluate the merit of this stub: High Sierra (biome). Is it worth keeping? Can it be expanded or should it be merged here? Any sources possible? - Will Beback · † · 05:12, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
Sierra Nevada forests redirected here indirectly. I started a stub article on that ecoregion there, and removed its external links from this page. -- Justin 19:05, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Shouldn't it be "Ecology of the Sierra Nevada"? Why "Environment"? Why not parallel structure with Natural history of California (which used to be Ecology of California)? I'm puzzled about the change and non-uniformity, perhaps we can discuss further. — hike395 ( talk) 07:48, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
Given that two ecoregion articles ( California oak woodland and California interior chaparral and woodlands) already cover the ecology of the lot hills, I believe that Sierra Nevada foothills is going to remain a redundant stub for a long time. The content of Sierra Nevada foothills would very nicely expand the Foothill Woodland and Chaparral section of this article. I propose merging the other article into that section and redirect to that section. If that section expands further, we can always split the article bak out. — hike395 ( talk) 00:36, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Ecology of the Sierra Nevada. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:43, 6 May 2017 (UTC)