This   level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Biography: Musicians This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as High-importance). New York City Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Pop music High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Women This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles Women in Music High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Women writers Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Carole King should really have a list of not just music she performed, but also the songs she wrote (which may well be her greater legacy). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mukogodo ( talk • contribs) 01:31, 21 February 2016 (UTC) reply

I would like to second the unidentified person who suggested that a list of songs written by Carole King would be interesting and informative. Especially if it identified those she wrote for other singers that she herself never performed later. Someone pointed me to a clip of a song called 'Early Morning Hush' she wrote for a singer named B. J. Thomas. Graham1973 ( talk) 14:27, 9 April 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Carole King. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130608060131/http://www.playbill.com:80/news/article/178331-Carole-King-White-House-Concert-With-Billy-Joel-and-James-Taylor-Broadcast-on-PBS-May-28 to http://www.playbill.com/news/article/178331-Carole-King-White-House-Concert-With-Billy-Joel-and-James-Taylor-Broadcast-on-PBS-May-28

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{ Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:09, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

I oppose the proposed merge with A Natural Woman (book), a clearly notable topic, and would consider it a courtesy if Salimfadhley would withdraw the proposal at this time, especially since the tag was placed just ten minutes after I'd began the entry: there's hardly been an opportunity even to see what kind of entry could be developed and a merge discussion is premature. Innisfree987 ( talk) 02:49, 28 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Sure, given that you are developing the article, please feel free to remove my merge tag. -- Salimfadhley ( talk) 04:23, 29 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your reply, will do. Innisfree987 ( talk) 05:28, 29 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Article in The Guardian about CK reworking "One" with the US elections in mind: Carole King on songwriting in the age of Trump: 'I am the honest opposition' Esowteric+ Talk 17:11, 29 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Lead says 1955, even though the body says nothing about anything King did in 1955. Infobox gives the starting year as 1958. Which one is right? Ilovetopaint ( talk) 17:19, 22 February 2019 (UTC) reply

"King also wrote 61 hits that charted in the UK,[3] making her the most successful female songwriter on the UK singles charts between 1952[contradictory] and 2005.[4]"

Why contradictory? Add up the hits on the UK charts during 1952 - 2005 and see which female songwriter is on top. Just because Carole was only 10 in 1952, and thus probably not much of a songwriter, if a songwriter at all, in that year, doesn't mean that she wasn't the most successful songwriter during that period. Think! 45.51.44.115 ( talk) 02:40, 23 November 2019 (UTC) reply

She is not in the Rock Hall, but is currently nominated. Wolf O'Donnel ( talk) 16:48, 10 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Rumor overheard night of 24 Dec 1998, Camp Doha, Kuwait, was that King had knocked out artist Jim Morrison with a single punch (possibly a wicked left hook). Ostensibly confirmed by SECDEF (William Cohen) who was also present at the time. King was silent on the issue, but body language suggested she agreed with the often repeated statement. [ [1]] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.51.198.157 ( talk) 13:12, 1 November 2021 (UTC) reply

I made a small edit, changed 25 million to 30 million with a citation, but I don't know enough to fix the messed up order of citations that I've just noticed. So I apologize PROFUSELY for messing up the syntax, I've never seen syntax this complicated. Luxfornow ( talk) 14:18, 24 August 2022 (UTC) reply

• Luxfornow, there already was a reference with "ref name=":0". Drmies ( talk) 14:21, 24 August 2022 (UTC) reply
  • OK! I need to study more about the actual meaning of :0
  • Many thanks @ Drmies Luxfornow ( talk) 22:10, 25 August 2022 (UTC) reply
    • Ha, it's not an emoji, Luxfornow. If you click on the diff you will see that I replaced your <ref name=":0"> with <ref name=latimes>. I don't know why you put that in there; perhaps you copied what you saw in the code, or perhaps you used some tool that named the reference, and the tool didn't know that there already was one reference with that name. In brief, you can name references so that you can use them more than once without having duplicates show up in the reflist. WP:REFNAME gives you more, and more technical, background. Happy editing, Drmies ( talk) 22:40, 25 August 2022 (UTC) reply

      Ha! No I didn't put that in there. I copied what I saw in the code, thinking it was some sort of checksum like "all references start here" but if I typed it in somehow, it was just a fatfinger error. Thanks Drmies for suggesting WP:REFNAME, I will bookmark it for whenever I need to brush up! Luxfornow ( talk) 19:47, 11 September 2022 (UTC) reply