This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Automobiles Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Brands This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

To be blunt, no such beast exists. That is to say the last series 62 combination car made was in 1958. In fact only a handful of commercial chassis were sold by Cadillac on the series 61 (through 1950) and 62 (through 1958). The most for the series 62 was in fact in 1956 (only 19). These chassis were of a relatively short wheelbase and generally considered impractical for professional car use. The vast majority of Cadillac commercial chassis during this period sold were part of the series 75, and that clearly includes the long wheelbase chassis used for the vehicle that became known as "Ecto-1".

I suggest that such content (which is of debatable importance) be moved to either the Cadillac Series 75 page and/or the Cadillac Commercial Chassis page where it belongs.

P.S. The last Series 62 4-door convertible was made in 1941.

Sadowski ( talk) 00:53, 22 August 2011 (UTC) reply

There's no way to track down failed references in Wiki as things stand. I would love to fix things but I can't Sadowski ( talk) 01:07, 27 March 2012 (UTC) reply

There's no way to find the weak reference. You click on it and it doesn't lead you there. Please fix this. Sadowski ( talk) 01:13, 27 March 2012 (UTC) reply

Figured it out on my own. Still amazingly frustrating. Sadowski ( talk) 01:37, 27 March 2012 (UTC) reply