CHUM (AM) was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The new CP24 Radio 1050 brand is still using the licensed call letters CHUM and therefor the page CHUM (AM) Still applies even though the CHUM brand is no longer on air. As a result we should ensure a historic 1050 CHUM portion to the article, and also have current information regarding the new format -- Eja2k ( talk) 19:43, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
I've added a photo of the old (1970s-1980s) CHUM transmitter to Commons at Image:CHUM Continental 317C-2 SN 299.jpg. 121a0012 06:04, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on CHUM (AM). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/toronto/archive/2009/03/25/chum-am-dies-again-is-reborn-as-cp24-radio-1050.aspx{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://members2.boardhost.com/scrapbook/msg/1238058433.htmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:25, 7 November 2017 (UTC)