From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

History log

I notice that the long history log of the article has disappeared. I wonder was it accidentally or intensionally. Can someone help out? CeeGee 20:16, 3 April 2006 (UTC) reply

An IP did a copy-paste move of the page. I've fixed it now. М иша 13 15:17, 17 December 2006 (UTC) reply

Pedestrians

Transportation says:

No pedestrians [...] are allowed to use the bridge today.

Then, Other Uses says:

Visitors to Istanbul in October can sign up for the 'fun run' at many points round the city and take the opportunity to cross the bridge by foot.

So, which is it? Are they allowed? Are they only allowed in October? If they exist, the Transportation section should indicate exceptions instead of a possibly false/overly broad statement. - Ayeroxor ( talk) 04:30, 1 September 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Bosphorus Bridge Night.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Bosphorus Bridge Night.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests January 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 03:17, 11 January 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Istanbulpanoramicview.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Istanbulpanoramicview.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Istanbulpanoramicview.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 05:24, 9 March 2012 (UTC) reply

BOTEK

BOTEK were established in 1975 and thus could not participate in the first, but only in the second bridge (as per their website). -- AHert ( talk) 16:55, 22 September 2013 (UTC) reply

English Name of the Bridge

"Bogazici" is the "name" of the bridge. It shouldn't be translated. The title should be changed to "Boğaziçi Bridge" or "Bogazici Bridge". Bogazici is a proper noun.-- 176.219.135.111 ( talk) 16:10, 28 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Bosphorus Bridge

The Bridge is known as Bosphorus Bridge in English speaking world. -- Kirov Airship ( talk) 21:55, 25 July 2016 (UTC) reply

True, Sixth Avenue in New York is officially called Avenue of the Americas, yet most people and Wikipedia use the COMMON NAME, I think we shouldn't rename pages like this so hastily. -- Killuminator ( talk) 00:38, 26 July 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes, I'm correcting to the common name. -- Kirov Airship ( talk) 14:03, 26 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Requested move 26 July 2016

July 15th Martyrs BridgeBosphorus Bridge – Bosphorus Bridge is the common name of this bridge in English language. Not only is known as Bosphorus Bridge among foreigners but also is known as Bosphorus Bridge among Turkish speaking community. Kirov Airship ( talk) 21:55, 26 July 2016 (UTC) reply

  • I have suspended this request and placed it at WP:RM#TR. Per WP:RMUM, this is should be a technical request. The onus should be on those wanting a new name to present a case here via the WP:RM process. —  AjaxSmack  02:06, 27 July 2016 (UTC) reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bosphorus Bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{ Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:52, 6 November 2016 (UTC) reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Bosphorus Bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:30, 23 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Requested move 25 April 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no clear consensus for the new title 15 July Martyrs Bridge, so reverting to the stable title, Bosphorus Bridge, per the discussion below. The ability to revert the first move away from this title was blocked by an unnecessary edit to the redirect, which should not have taken place; this should likely have been reverted earlier as a request to revert an undiscussed move per WP:RMTR. In either event, please initiate a new move request if you are interested in altering the stable title of this page. Dekimasu よ! 20:38, 1 May 2018 (UTC) reply



15 July Martyrs BridgeBosphorus Bridge – As per WP:Common names, the title of the article should remain Bosphorus Bridge, as that is how the bridge is known in the English speaking world. Even within Turkey, it is still called Boğaziçi Köprüsü (Bosphorus Bridge). The name change is not justified and should be moved back, since it was done without notifying the talk page on a controversial move. Central Data Bank ( talk) 20:06, 25 April 2018 (UTC) reply

  • Support. Indeed. Clear common name. Recently-imposed official names do not supersede common names. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 13:50, 26 April 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Source

--- Another Believer ( Talk) 03:12, 4 November 2023 (UTC) reply

How Does The Bosphorus Bridge Have Eight Lanes if Only Six Are Visible?

The article says the Bosphorus Bridge highway is eight lanes wide, with three standard lanes, one emergency lane, and one pedestrian lane serving each direction.

Judging by photos and aerial imagery, I can only see six lanes total (three in each direction), plus the pedestrian lane. The article for the Fatih Sultan Mehmet Bridge also makes a similar mention of emergency lanes in addition to the four regular traffic lanes in each direction that one has. There is no indication given of the existence of any emergency lanes on either the first or second Bosphorus Bridges. Also, their Turkish counterpart articles don't make any mention of such emergency lanes. Anyone care to clarify what this "emergency lane" on these bridges is? Jim856796 ( talk) 04:00, 5 November 2023 (UTC) reply