This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Hmmm, maybe this should be moved/retitled to "county board of supervisors"?
Kestenbaum 02:14, 6 May 2006 (UTC)reply
Ehh? {shrugs} --
evrik 13:55, 8 May 2006 (UTC)reply
I don't care one way or another. However, there are "board(s) of supervisors" for non-county agencies, i.e., the governing bodies of the Louisiana state universities.
Calwatch 02:53, 9 May 2006 (UTC)reply
Sure, but are those really within the scope of this article?
Here in Michigan, the governing boards of the three major state universities, all elected statewide, have three different names (board of regents, board of trustees, board of governors). A lot of private colleges have a "board of visitors". Doesn't Harvard have a "board of overseers"? College/university governance is a whole other world. I presume this article is about local government.
Kestenbaum 09:07, 9 May 2006 (UTC)reply
Okay, retitling done.
Kestenbaum 18:47, 11 May 2006 (UTC)reply
Worldview tag
As far as I'm aware, only the U.S. has bodies called "county Boards of Supervisors". The situation is different to, say,
county councils, which exist in a number of countries. I've therefore removed the {{worldview}} tag. —
Lincolnite (
talk) 22:15, 28 May 2008 (UTC)reply
The original tag, which was later redirected (inappropriately, imho), was for generic limited geographic scope, not worldview. I will add a currently existing tag that expresses this.
Doctor Whom (
talk) 18:38, 25 June 2008 (UTC)reply
Huh? The article adequately describes boards of supervisors as they exist in the states that actually have them. The "balanced geographical coverage" tag makes no sense.--
Coolcaesar (
talk) 07:05, 23 September 2008 (UTC)reply
Okay, no one has answered my question. I'm killing that tag. --
Coolcaesar (
talk) 08:05, 4 January 2009 (UTC)reply