From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Bill Anderson's "Biggest" Hits?

Bill Anderson's "biggest hits" according to who? In the opinion of the writer? This doesn't seem too NPOV to me. Duprees62 02:57, 16 May 2007 (UTC) reply

The source referenced says it was is his biggest hit and signature song. Tomsv 98 ( talk) 18:03, 29 June 2012 (UTC) reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bill Anderson (singer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{ Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:07, 2 November 2016 (UTC) reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bill Anderson (singer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{ Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:26, 12 November 2016 (UTC) reply

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Bill Anderson (singer)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TenPoundHammer ( talk · contribs) 04:59, 16 February 2021 (UTC) reply


GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Just a couple minor issues that should be easily fixable.

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    As usual, just watch for overuse of commas and overlinking of words. I did a bit more copy-editing.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a ( reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR): d ( copyvio and plagiarism):
  • Again, I would recommend catalog numbers for any time that you cite an album liner notes.
  • Discogs is user-submitted and therefore not a reliable source. I would suggest a replacement here if possible. This was the only source I spotted that was unreliable.
    • @ TenPoundHammer: I couldn't find another source. The problem was the UK version had all 4 tracks, while the US version did not. ChrisTofu11961 ( talk) 02:38, 18 February 2021 (UTC) reply
  • A couple sources were missing the "work" field, which I fixed.
  1. It is broad in its coverage.
    a ( major aspects): b ( focused):
  2. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  3. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  4. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b ( appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Side comment: I love how this is the second article you've worked on where a picture of a Krystal restaurant is actually relevant.
    @ TenPoundHammer: Hah, didn't even cross my mind until you mentioned it now. ChrisTofu11961 ( talk) 02:38, 18 February 2021 (UTC) reply
  5. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
  • Problems have been addressed to my satisfaction, so once again this gets a passed. Ten Pound Hammer( What did I screw up now?) 03:03, 18 February 2021 (UTC) reply