This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Energy Start‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles Start This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Companies Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{ portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{ WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments California Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Mills Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mills, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mills on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MillsWikipedia:WikiProject MillsTemplate:WikiProject MillsMills articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. Environment: Sustainability Mid‑importance This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Sustainability task force.

Who owns the farm? -- evrik ^{( talk)} 15:56, 29 April 2008 (UTC) reply

What are some specs on the turbines and towers, eg, height and diameter? lgroner 4 August 2010-- Lou ( talk) 16:58, 4 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The Altamont pass wind farm is in Northern California, so it's not obvious why declines in eagle populations in Southern California are relevant to this article. Is this a typo, or can someone make the connection clear?

Could this article be any more biased? It seems like someone from the Audobon society themselves wrote it. It's supposed to be about the wind farm, yet more than half of the article deals with golden eagles being killed by them. I'm just saying, this is a bit too biased for my tastes. I have to add the tag, but only because of the second half of the article.

I believe that the information about birds-of-prey being killed by wind turbines should be moved to a page specifically about either the negative impacts of turbines or in a section on the page for wind turbines. The opening of the article is fine because it is factually correct and is free of opinions.

71.83.137.23 ( talk) 22:11, 9 October 2013 (UTC) reply

I wholly disagree. The Altamont wind farm has long been famous for its high number of raptor deaths. It has become the poster child of the problems of old-style turbines with killing large birds. No article on Altamont would be complete without covering it. That the paragraphs on the bird problem take up more than half the article is not the fault of the bird-death coverage: in fact, the article would be an inconsequential little stub without it. There is no good reason to banish the bad news side of this subject to a separate article. You are of course welcome to add properly referenced analyses contrary to those of the Audobon Society, and to improve any biased wording, but the factual content should stay. Plazak ( talk) 01:13, 10 October 2013 (UTC) reply

I'll disagree as well. This farm is notorious for killing golden eagles, roughly 70 per year. This is really large compared to the other wind farms. Though I support wind power, the number of deaths of golden eagles has to be kept to a manageable level. -- 66.41.154.0 ( talk) 04:02, 14 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Altamont Pass Wind Farm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120203055822/http://www.calwea.org/bigPicture.html to http://www.calwea.org/bigPicture.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.eoearth.org/article/Altamont_Pass%2C_California

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:27, 2 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Altamont Pass Wind Farm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130416034154/http://sfist.com/2010/12/07/altamont_pass_to_get_less-deadly_wi.php to http://sfist.com/2010/12/07/altamont_pass_to_get_less-deadly_wi.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:39, 3 November 2017 (UTC) reply

A lot of the information in this article is over a decade old and is very outdated. For example, very few of those small, high-mortality turbines are operating anymore. Huge swaths of Altamont Pass have been "repowered" with >2 MW turbines since then. This entire article needs to be rewritten with new data, in order to give the correct qualitative and quantitative information about the site. 96.90.215.179 ( talk) 02:03, 24 February 2018 (UTC) reply