This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Architecture Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. The Beatles High‑importance This Beatles-related article is within the scope of WikiProject The Beatles, which focuses on improving coverage of English rock band The Beatles and related topics on Wikipedia. Users who are willing to participate in the project should visit the project page, where they can join and see a list of open tasks.The BeatlesWikipedia:WikiProject The BeatlesTemplate:WikiProject The BeatlesThe Beatles articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. To-do list: For WikiProject The Beatles A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects. Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Articles on each Beatle tour ( Category:The Beatles concert tours). See: Missing articles. Expand : The Lost Lennon Tapes, notable radio series which has spawned many bootlegs. Apple Records See also: Adopt an article Stubs : See: Category:The Beatles song stubs Update : Pics/Graphics wanted: Kenwood. Verify : Beatle wives Other : Project: Add {{ WikiProject The Beatles}} to the talk pages of all Beatles-related articles. Send a newsletter to members, canvas for new members and coordinate tasks. Enter articles assessed as stubs onto this list, also list articles needing cleanup and other work here. This article does not yet have a related to do list. If you can think of any ways to improve the article, why not create one? Pink Floyd Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pink Floyd, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pink Floyd on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pink FloydWikipedia:WikiProject Pink FloydTemplate:WikiProject Pink FloydPink Floyd articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article was a past project collaboration. To-do list: Fair use Add fair use rationale to all images and sound samples (all except images already labeled free use). Re-size large images around to 300 pixels (all "fair use" images), other than album covers (already done). Articles Expand all articles to at least Start class. Some song stubs can't be expanded and should be redirected to the relevant album article. Use the " Interstellar Overdrive" article as an example when editing a song stub. Expand all of the Floyd's studio album articles to at least GA status. See COTM for monthly collabs. Project building Add WikiProject Pink Floyd banner {{ WPFloyd}} to all appropriate Talk pages. Personally invite quality editors working on Pink Floyd articles to join the project. If you complete one of these tasks, please remove it from the list. This article does not yet have a related to do list. If you can think of any ways to improve the article, why not create one? Professional sound production High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Professional sound production, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sound recording and reproduction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Professional sound productionWikipedia:WikiProject Professional sound productionTemplate:WikiProject Professional sound productionProfessional sound production articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Rock music High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. London Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

The console installed for most of the 60's and most used by The Beatles was the REDD.51, not the REDD.17. The REDD.17 was replaced by the REDD.37, the first console built by EMI with four track mixing in mind. By 1964, The 37 was replaced with the REDD.51 which lasted in Studio Two until Nov. 1968.

This is all described in great detail in the extensive "Recording The Beatles" book. Pg. 68 & 113.

Someone please correct. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.156.55.39 ( talk) 01:35, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply

Though this article lists the AMI Neve and SSL consoles that the studio now uses, it should also dicuss the far more important in-house custom made REDD series consoles, particulary the the legendary REDD. 37 and REDD.51 consoles that were used in the glory days of the 60s. Unlike the ubiquitous newer consoles, these vintage desks were specially engineered, developed, and hand made by EMI exclusively for its own studios. These consoles were made of all hand-wired valve (vacuum tube) circuitry and are often revered as some of the best sounding consoles ever made. It would be simply too expensive today to use the level of quality of circuitry (per channel) that these employed, because consoles today are expected to have, usually, 72 or more channels and way more controls and inputs. You could also mention the famous EMI TG custom made desks (with discreet solid state ciruits) used in the 70s, which were also custom engineeered and made in house. These were also renowned for thier sound quality. [1] [2] Garagepunk66 ( talk) 06:51, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply

Stand outside the studios this summer and I betcher that within half an hour you will see some tourists walking across that crossing with a friend taking their photo.

The article says that the crossing was moved somewhat to the east in the 70's. I don't know. On the beatles cover you can spot some lid of a gas or electrical device in the street, at the edge of the picture on the white bar that Ringo is stepping on with his left foot. I was at Abbey Road on 6 May 2010 and it is still there, in the same spot in the white bar. —Preceding unsigned comment added by FZ ( talk • contribs) 14:46, 8 May 2010 (UTC) reply

This is a very good point; I was there in October 2010 and didn't notice the little box thing on "Ringo's bar" in the crosswalk, but looking at a photo I took, it is there, exactly where it appears on the album. Was the crosswalk actually moved? This page says it was moved "east", but it seems like "south" would be a more accurate description. What is the source for saying it was moved? The evidence seems to point to the contrary. Someone should get to the bottom of this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.240.84.129 ( talk) 05:30, 1 December 2010 (UTC) reply

See my "moved crossing" post lower on this page. Galenfott ( talk) 07:10, 2 December 2010 (UTC) reply

I think the link to Columbia Records is confusing. It links to a page discussing the history of the U.S. Columbia records. I believe that EMI actually merged with a UK company which had been affiliated with the American company, but was not actually a part of it. But I don't know this with enough certainty and detail to feel confident in changing the page myself. Does someone with better knowledge want to take a crack at it?-- David Fell 09:46, Apr 13, 2005 (UTC)

No mention of the Red Hot Chili Pepper's cover of The Abbey Road EP? How come?

"The Shadows rejuvenated the studios, breaking with convention, originating overnight recording sessions, allowing new recording techniques. The group opened up the studios to loud, heavy guitar driven music, allowing an easy entrance for the lighter sounds of the Beatles. "

or

"The Beatles rejuvenated the studios, breaking with convention, originating overnight recording sessions, allowing new recording techniques. The group opened up the studios to loud, heavy guitar driven music. "

so which is it? Did they both "rejuvinate" the studio with new recording techniques? J Shultz 22:58, 4 June 2006 (UTC) reply

I'm going to delet both until someone can give a definite (sourced) answer. - MBlume 00:32, 17 June 2006 (UTC) reply

I wholeheartedly agree with every word of this paragraph, but that doesn't mean it's not POV:

Starting with their first (heavily laid down) loud and racous (compare 'Twist and shout' with 'Move it') album 'Please please me', through the pop (non R&B copied formula) dominated "A hard days night', the folky/country 'The Beatles for sale', 'Help', 'Rubber soul', The beuatifully pop drenched 'Revolver', the ground breaking "Sgt Peppers", the birth of Rock's "White album", through to the swan song 'Abbey Road', It was the Beatles who broke with tradition, changing recording techniques, and forever changing the boundries of what was considered Popular music. Inventing flanging, backwards recording, automatic double tracking, and the first band to use feedback on a recording, The Beatles utilised Abbey Road studios to full effect.

- MBlume 00:34, 17 June 2006 (UTC) reply

Can someone please rescue this poor tortured paragraph (third in History section): Stevage 08:57, 4 July 2006 (UTC) reply

Starting with their first (heavily laid down) loud and racous (compare 'Twist and shout' with 'Move it') album 'Please please me', through the pop (non R&B copied formula) dominated "A hard days night', the folky/country 'The Beatles for sale', 'Help', 'Rubber soul', The beuatifully pop drenched 'Revolver', the ground breaking "Sgt Peppers", the birth of Rock's "White album", through to the swan song 'Abbey Road', It was the Beatles who broke with tradition, changing recording techniques, and forever changing the boundaries of what was considered Popular music.

look up about an inch. I'm sorry, I fully agree with the whole paragraph, but it's really really obvious POV - MBlume 00:13, 10 July 2006 (UTC) reply

With all due respect, I would suggest modifying the following paragraph:

The chief mastering engineer at Abbey Road was Chris "Vinyl" Blair, who started his career early on as a tape deck operator. He worked his way up the ranks to get to the top. A highlight of Blair's career was receiving an award for Radiohead's Kid A. Blair died on November 7, 2005.

I can understand including a reference to Mr Blair, possibly some sort of detail as to how many years he spent at Abbey Road, rather than just the fact that he died on such and such date. I don't want to delete it as it obviously means something to someone. 83.180.184.252 02:39, 7 January 2007 (UTC) reply

Am slightly concerned that the article page may in time become just a list of people/bands that have recorded at Abbey Road. While such a chronological list might be of interest, and I personally think it might, I suggest it be drawn up on a separate article page. The main article could keep the references to those who have had a long-lasting relationship with the studios (e.g. The Beatles, Pink Floyd, etc.) while linking to the chronological list for specific albums, dates, track listings, etc. Likewise for the film references. Feedback please. 83.180.184.252 02:56, 7 January 2007 (UTC) reply

The article is definitely becoming just a list of albums and film soundtracks recorded at Abbey Road. What can be done about this? -- Technopat 22:39, 5 July 2007 (UTC) reply

Spin it off into a List of artists and albums recorded at Abbey Road Studios? That should concentrate this article on the studios themselves, and provide an opportunity for those wishing to reproduce the studio log-book. I agree the most significant should also be put into a prose section in this article (limited to - say - 10). Kbthompson 09:05, 6 July 2007 (UTC) reply

Agreed. If you're willing to set up the spin-off page, I'll make the chronological list of recordings and soundtracks. Shall we wait for a couple of weeks for other opinions? Regards, -- Technopat 22:03, 6 July 2007 (UTC) reply

Agreed. This is arguably the most famous recording studios on the planet. The number of people that have or want to record there would make this list miles long. It needs to be a separate spin off to preserve the main article Greenshinobi ( talk) 23:28, 10 February 2011 (UTC) reply

what's considered to be the Abbey Road's relic,don't you know?I've heard it is,but I don't know exactly —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.149.1.228 ( talk) 19:37, 14 March 2007 (UTC). reply

As per discussion above, re. excessive length of article, etc., have moved the list of film scores recorded to List of film scores recorded at Abbey Road Studios. Will do similar with albums when find time. Please help. Regards, -- Technopat 23:09, 23 October 2007 (UTC) reply

Set up spin-off for List of Pink Floyd albums recorded at Abbey Road Studios and deleted said albums from main body of text. Regs. -- Technopat 12:02, 31 October 2007 (UTC) reply

Removing from 1831 in Architecture and adding to 1813 in Architecture. Some sources give 1831 as the construction of the building, however I'm willing to go with the article. MartinSFSA ( talk) 06:51, 28 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Oasis recorded their 2008 album, Dig Out Your Soul, in Abbey Road, the first time they have recorded a full album there. They attempted to record 1997's Be Here Now but got thrown out because, according to Noel Gallagher, "They were too young and a bit mad back then".

Dig Out Your Soul was originally going to be recorded at the Boardwalk in Manchester where Oasis originally rehearsed, but apparently Liam said to Noel, "Fuck that, let's do it at Abbey Road. We're all Beatle-heads, and they did all their stuff there."

-- Technopat ( talk) 06:10, 7 October 2009 (UTC) reply

I edited the page to remove the fallacy that the famous zebra crossing has ever been moved. See my webpage at http://www.grundoon.com/Abbey_Road.html for photographic evidence. And it's worth noting that according to the History page, the edits about the moving of the crossing were made on April Fools' Day, 2008. Galenfott ( talk) 17:49, 1 December 2010 (UTC) reply

You are invited to participate in an RfC at Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/The Beatles on the issue of capitalising the definite article when mentioning that band's name in running prose. This long-standing dispute is the subject of an open mediation case and we are requesting your help with determining the current community consensus. Thank you for your time. For the mediators. ~ GabeMc ^{( talk| contribs)} 00:08, 23 September 2012 (UTC) reply

Ainsley117 wrote that Altec speakers are featured. As far as I can figure, the studio monitors at Abbey Road Studios are various, but they do not currently feature Altecs.

• Studio One: "The monitoring is provided by three B&W Nautilus 800D Loudspeakers and five HTM1 rear speakers fully configured for surround monitoring up to 7.1 channels."
• Studio Two: "...the room houses a Bowers & Wilkins 5.1 surround monitoring system. A wide variety of nearfield speakers are also available."
• Studio Three: "The room has Quested stereo monitoring in addition to a 5.1 B&W 800D set up."
• Penthouse Studio: "Monitoring is provided by five B&W Nautilus 800D speakers."
• Studio 52: "...B&W and Adams monitoring."

This shows that the majority of monitoring loudspeakers are Bowers & Wilkins (B&W) with some Quested and Adams. Everything else at Abbey Road is reduced to "also available". Altec loudspeakers cannot be said to be in prominent use at Abbey Road Studios. Binksternet ( talk) 16:30, 20 February 2013 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Abbey Road Studios. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{ cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{ nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20121102094723/http://www.gramophone.net/Issue/Page/July%201979/125/750999/AUDIO+NEWS to http://www.gramophone.net/Issue/Page/July%201979/125/750999/AUDIO+NEWS

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. — ^{cyberbot II} _{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:36, 29 August 2015 (UTC) reply

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Abbey Road Studios/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Last edited at 00:16, 4 July 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 06:28, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

An article in the November 2012 issue of Sound on Sound states "EMI Studios ... was officially renamed Abbey Road Studios in 1970". Meanwhile, in Kenneth Womack's 2019 book Solid State: The Story of Abbey Road and the End of the Beatles (Cornell University Press), he states the following:

When he was promoted as the operation's general manager in 1974, Ken Townsend began the process of rebranding EMI Studios as Abbey Road Studios. Made official in 1976, the rechristening proved to be a deft marketing move that has ensured the building's much-deserved global fame. (p. 237).

Womack's source may be chapter one of Brian Southall and Ruper Perry's 2009 book Northern Songs: The True Story of the Beatles Song Publishing Empire (Omnibus), but it's hard to tell from his endnote formatting (I don't have access to Southall and Perry's book). Womack interviewed Townsend and numerous other people associated with the studio for the book.

I've looked through WorldRadioHistory.com to see if there were any contemporary articles in the 1970s detailing the name change, but I've come up empty. The only pre-1975 article I've found referencing "Abbey Road Studios" is in the 12 February 1972 issue of Disc and Music Echo magazine, where Paul McCartney calls it "E.M.I's Abbey Road Studios" (p. 8). Can anyone find any more sources that might shed more light on the change? Tkbrett (✉) 17:37, 27 June 2022 (UTC) reply

... the non-pop musical artists. Classical music, spoken word, comedy... 123.243.150.168 ( talk) 01:25, 19 February 2024 (UTC) reply