This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Architecture Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Skyscrapers Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkyscrapersWikipedia:WikiProject SkyscrapersTemplate:WikiProject SkyscrapersSkyscraper articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. New York City Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Is this the one with the Anish Kapoor? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.84.123.169 ( talk) 16:39, 10 April 2009 (UTC) reply

I work for Rubenstein Communications and I propose the following additions on behalf of Alexico Group. To mitigate conflict of interest issues, I ask that an editor review the edits and take them live, as they see fit. If no objections are had and no edits are made within three days, I will go ahead and update the entry myself. NinaSpezz ( talk) 15:46, 25 June 2013 (UTC) reply

• Integrated proposed additions into the entry. NinaSpezz ( talk) 16:17, 28 June 2013 (UTC) reply

I'd once again like to add an update. In the lead paragraph, just after "As of May 2013...", I'd like to add: According to building developer Izak Senbahar, the building was 92% sold in seven months. [1] NinaSpezz ( talk) 21:41, 14 November 2014 (UTC) reply

• Incorporated addition. NinaSpezz ( talk) 18:07, 21 November 2014 (UTC) reply

I have taken of the image of the building that appears to be a higher quality and better color correction than the current one. What are the standards for replacing the image? Noroftheair ( talk) 00:49, 13 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 56 Leonard Street. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081201020048/http://www.lowermanhattan.info/construction/project_updates/56_leonard_street_39943.aspx to http://www.lowermanhattan.info/construction/project_updates/56_leonard_street_39943.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:57, 23 June 2017 (UTC) reply

I added to the article that this building is also known as the ‘Jenga tower’ not just the ‘Jenga building’ as that’s what an architect said on the Smithsonian channel programme. However I’ve made a bit of a mess of the references so that the programme is now referenced twice. If someone better than me at referencing could alter this so that there are 14 references not 15 then please do Overlordnat1 ( talk) 17:12, 16 June 2021 (UTC) reply

This has now been fixed. Overlordnat1 ( talk) 11:26, 2 September 2021 (UTC) reply