From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nominee2008 California Proposition 8 was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 16, 2008 Good article nomineeNot listed
May 17, 2009 Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Former good article nominee

Merger proposal

I don't think November 15, 2008 anti-Proposition 8 protests was impactful enough to merit an article separate from this – maybe this warrants a few sentences to a paragraph as a merge to this article? theleekycauldron ( talkcontribs) (she/ they) 18:36, 22 August 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Support merge. The protests article is primarily a list of locations, and if it is cut, the rest of the content is short enough to be combined into a paragraph. Hanif Al Husaini ( talk) 07:34, 29 August 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Support. Clearly not enough for a stand-alone article here.-- Trystan ( talk) 13:26, 31 August 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Support merger per above. CX Zoom[he/him] ( let's talk • { CX}) 10:37, 10 October 2022 (UTC) reply
Support - Not enough content for a split. Onegreatjoke ( talk) 16:59, 2 November 2022 (UTC) reply
@ Theleekycauldron: @ Hanif Al Husaini: @ Trystan: @ CX Zoom: @ Onegreatjoke: @ Hekerui: I think we have consensus for a merge here. Perhaps one or more of you would like to jump in! Joyous! | Talk 04:01, 13 February 2023 (UTC) reply
I boldly redirected, sufficient content in main article in my opinion Hekerui ( talk) 18:15, 14 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected edit request on 10 December 2023

I'm doing personal research on the repeal process of Proposition 8, and would definitely like to also find the link to the original article. Am new to editing wikipedia, saw this, wanted to update it. Broken reference link to reference 268, refers me to the home page of SFGATE, not the article link. Please add a link to an archived page of the article, as the link ' http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/nov05election/detail?blogid=14&entry_id=43580' is longer public on the sfgate.com website. Found this link: ' https://archive.is/K5Fj' from an archiving site after inputting the previous, non-working website link. ProlificSundown ( talk) 03:10, 10 December 2023 (UTC) reply

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Shadow311 ( talk) 18:03, 10 December 2023 (UTC) reply

why locked?

why is this still locked? 71.223.71.176 ( talk) 18:15, 2 April 2024 (UTC) reply

You can request unprotection at WP:RPP. -- Nat Gertler ( talk) 20:42, 2 April 2024 (UTC) reply