This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
2.0 (film) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 4 days |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
it should be changed to 665 crores
https://www.boxofficeindia.com/report-details.php?articleid=4721
box office india being a reliable source according to WP:ICTFSOURCES
there are many speculation on the final collection but the estimate of 665 is verified by other independent trackers like pinkvilla and cinetrak Prasanna203 ( talk) 14:17, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
2.0 and bahubali collection straight away mentioned as 699.89 and 599.72 why the partiality shown by wiki for these 2 southern films.anyone can answer hindi films collection taken lowest and highest(Example 548 and 584 mentionedas 548-584) for these 2 films low collection only taken.for Example why you cant taken bahibali as 599-650 highest reported and 2.0 699.89 to 800 highest reported. Rule should be same for all Rajesh1900 ( talk) 08:34, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
We need a new section to talk about the misinformation spread by this film.
The subject of the film, mobile phone radiation affecting birds, is just an urban legend, and is not endorsed by scientists. This article published by National Audubon Society addresses the topic, and also mentions the impact created by this film (2.0) in spreading the conspiracy theory further. https://www.audubon.org/news/no-5g-radio-waves-do-not-kill-birds
Indian ornithologist, Asad Rahmani, former director of Bombay Naturalist Society, who also headed the parliament panel to study the ill effects of mobile phone radiation on birds, said "There is no scientific proof between electromagnetic radiation and absence of sparrows."
The panel was set up after a Parliament member raised the issue of ill effects of mobile towers on birds in the Lok Sabha. After an exhaustive study of the published scientific papers – the 88-page report carries a bibliography running into 55 pages – the panel concluded that there are no long-term data available on the environmental impacts of electromagnetic radiation and studies on the impact of radiation on birds and other wildlife are almost non-existent in India.
Source of the above info: https://www.deccanherald.com/india/rajni-movie-20-does-cell-phone-705685.html
In addition to creating a new section to talk about this, the reference numbered "e" in the Notes section has to be removed, as the links there are just sensational articles, ignoring actual science. Amaravind ( talk) 07:04, 2 January 2024 (UTC)