Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at
Help:Related changes.
diffhistRenewable energy 11:47−546
EMsmiletalkcontribs (→Health and environmental impact: took out repetition with other sections. Also this kind of health and env impact would have to be in the individual articles for the different renewable energy source; doesn't make sense to aggregate this together. But air pollution and CO2 emissions is already included above.)Tag: Visual edit
diffhistSCADA 11:29−137
Omnissiahs hierophanttalkcontribs (Removed statement about how it is widely used "in spite" of being insecure. Statement had citation needed since 2021, and imho it was also both irrelevant and alarmistic. It is what you make out of it.)Tags: Mobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
diffhistRenewable energy 11:26−2,000
EMsmiletalkcontribs (I've changed the second sentence now to make it less abstract but more concrete, using the same terms and ordering that we have in the table of content and the terms that the readers can relate to.)Tag: Visual edit
diffhistRenewable energy 11:12−7
EMsmiletalkcontribs (moved into about public support from lead to main text (or maybe better to delete the sentence altogether?). Seems outdated, primary sources. It's not needed for the lead. So what if people say they "support" it. The question is are they willing to pay for it; are their governments willing to scrap other subsidies etc. That's more important.)Tag: Visual edit
diffhistRenewable energy 11:08+2
EMsmiletalkcontribs (re-arranged. Putting into the first para what I think people need to know the most. That info on sustainable energy, I've now moved to the end of the lead. It's more of an academic discussion and won't be so relevant to most of the readers.)Tag: Visual edit