US: Neither performed nor recognized in
some tribal nations. Recognized but not performed in several other tribal nations and
American Samoa.
Israel: Registered foreign marriages confer all marriage rights. Domestic common-law marriages confer most rights of marriage. Domestic civil marriage recognized by some cities.
Debate has occurred throughout Europe over proposals to legalise
same-sex marriage as well as same-sex
civil unions. Currently 33 of the 50 countries and the 8 dependent territories in
Europe recognise some type of same-sex union, among them most members of the
European Union (24/27). Nearly 43% of the European population lives in jurisdictions where same-sex marriage is legal.
Poland and
Slovakia recognise private contractual cohabitation of two persons (regardless of sexual orientation or relationship type - including non-sexual non-intimate relationships) for limited purposes. Although they do not recognise same-sex unions themselves,
Bulgaria,
Lithuania and
Romania are bound by a ruling by the
European Court of Justice to recognise same-sex marriages performed within the EU and including an EU citizen for the purposes of granting legal residence,[1] though this ruling is not always respected in practice, as in the case of Romania which has not implemented the ruling.[2] In December 2023, the
European Court of Human Rights ruled that by failing to legalise same-sex unions, Poland had violated the right to respect for private and family life.[3]
Of the countries that perform same-sex marriages, some still allow civil unions, e.g. the
Benelux nations,
France and the
United Kingdom,[nb 1] whereas Germany, Ireland and the
Nordic countries have ended their pre-marriage civil union legislation so that existing unions remain but new ones are not possible.
Over the years, the
European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has handled cases that challenged the lack of legal recognition of same-sex couples in certain member states. The Court has held that the
European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) requires member states to provide legal recognition, but does not require marriage to be opened to same-sex couples.
In Schalk and Kopf v Austria (24 June 2010), the European Court of Human Rights decided that the European Convention on Human Rights does not oblige member states to legislate for or legally recognise same-sex marriages.[4] However, the Court, for the first time, accepted same-sex relationships as a form of "family life".
In Vallianatos and Others v Greece (7 November 2013),[5] the Court held that exclusion of same-sex couples from registering a civil union, a legal form of partnership available to opposite-sex couples, violates the convention. Greece had enacted a law in 2008 that established civil unions for opposite-sex couples only. A 2015 law extended partnership rights to same-sex couples.
Oliari and Others v Italy (21 July 2015)[6] went further and established a
positive obligation upon member states to provide legal recognition for same-sex couples. Italy thus breached the convention; it eventually implemented civil unions in 2016. The decision set a precedent for potential future cases regarding the 23 member states, certain British and Dutch territories, and the states with limited recognition (excluding Kosovo), that currently do not recognise same-sex couples' right to family life.[7]
Chapin and Charpentier v France (9 June 2016)[8] largely confirmed Schalk and Kopf v. Austria, holding that denying a same-sex couple access to marriage does not violate the convention.[9][10] At the time of the judgment, France did allow same-sex marriage, however, the case originated from 2004 (regarding the validity of a same-sex marriage officiated by
Noël Mamère), when only
pacte civil de solidarité (PACS) was available to same-sex couples in France.
Fedotova and Others v. Russia (17 January 2023) ruled that states are obliged to recognize
same-sex unions or
civil unions. Other similar cases from other countries, including
Poland, are awaiting the Tribunal.[11][12] The ECHR informed the Polish government that it had accepted complaints about the lack of access for same-sex couples to marriage or civil partnerships in Poland (2020).[13]
In a judgment issued on 12 December 2023 in the case of Przybyszewska and Others v. Poland (applications nos. 11454/17 and 9 others), the
European Court of Human Rights ruled that by failing to legalise same-sex unions, Poland had violated the right to respect for private and family life (
Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights). The Court found that the Polish State had failed to ensure a legal framework providing for the recognition and protection of their same-sex unions, preventing the applicants from formalising fundamental aspects of their lives, which amounted to a breach of their right to respect for their private and family life.[3]
Some debate occurred within the European Union about how to require member states to recognise same-sex marriages conducted in other member states, as well as any European citizens'
civil unions or registered partnerships, so as to ensure the right of freedom of movement for citizens' family members.[14]
In 2010, Romanian LGBT activist Adrian Coman and his American partner, Robert Claibourn Hamilton, married in Belgium, and subsequently attempted to relocate to Romania. Romanian authorities refused to recognise their marriage and the case progressed to the
European Court of Justice.[15] On 11 January 2018, the ECJ's advocate general,
Melchior Wathelet, issued an official legal opinion stating that an EU member country cannot refuse residency rights to the same-sex spouse of an EU citizen on the grounds that it does not recognise same-sex marriage.[16]
On 5 June 2018, the ECJ ruled in Coman's favour, stating the term "spouse" was gender-neutral, and member states are therefore obliged to recognise EU residency rights for partners of EU citizens. However, the court confirmed that it will still be up to member states whether to authorise same-sex marriage.[17][1]
According to research from the
European Parliament, some EU states still do not in practice grant residency to same-sex spouses, as required by Coman v. Romania. As of September 2021, Hamilton himself has not been granted residency by the Romanian government, despite the ruling. In September 2021, the European Parliament passed a resolution condemning some states failure to implement the ruling, and calling on the European Commission to ensure rights of same-sex spouses are upheld.[2]
National level
Status
Country
Since
Country population (Last Census count)
Marriage (21 countries) * In eleven countries that have passed marriage, other types of partnerships are available too.
Total - Countries with some form of recognition of same-sex unions
—
—
502,747,040 (58.1% of the European population)
No recognition (8 countries) † As part of the European Union, is legally bound to provide residency rights to foreign same-sex spouses of EU citizens in compliance with case C-673/16 of the European Court of Justice.
Constitutional ban on marriage (14 countries) † As part of the European Union, is legally bound to provide residency rights to foreign same-sex spouses of EU citizens in compliance with case C-673/16 of the European Court of Justice. * Other types of partnerships are available.
Government proposals or proposals with a parliamentary majority
Liechtenstein: On 11 March 2022, the government introduced a bill to allow stepchild adoption for same-sex couples in registered partnerships, in accordance with a 2021 court ruling, and said future bills for full marriage equality and joint adoption would have to come from individual MPs.[92] On 21 September 2022, a motion calling on the government to introduce a bill legalizing same-sex marriage[93] was submitted to the Landtag by 15 out of the 25 sitting members.[94][95] The motion was passed by a 23–2 vote in the plenary session on 2 November 2022.[96][97][98] On 11 July 2023, the government adopted a consultation report on the implementation of the motion and established a consultation period until 10 October 2023.[99][100] On 6 February 2024, the government adopted the results of the consultation report along with the subsequent proposal regarding the amendment of the Marriage Act, the Partnership Act and the Personal and Company Law.[101][102][103] The proposal was approved at its 1st reading on 8 March 2024 by a 24-1 vote, with an expected enactment date of 1 January 2025.[104][105][106][107][108] A final vote on the legislation is expected before the summer break.[109]
Opposition proposals
Italy: During the current legislature, several bills to legalise same-sex marriage and adoption have been tabled by all major opposition parties (PD, M5S, Azione - Italia Viva and Alleanza Verdi Sinistra). However, as of January 2024, these bills are unlikely to pass due to lack of support from the government coalition, which holds a large majority in Parliament.[citation needed]
Non-marital partnership
Government proposals or proposals with a parliamentary majority
Czech Republic: A bill amending the Civil Code to allow same-sex marriage was introduced in the
Chamber of Deputies on 7 June 2022. The draft was signed by one representative each from five parliamentary groups: Mayors and Independents (STAN), TOP 09, the Pirate Party, the Civic Democratic Party (ODS) and ANO.[110] Debate on the bill began in May 2023.[111][112][113] The bill passed its first reading by 68 votes to 58 in the Chamber of Deputies on 29 June 2023.[114][115] On 23 October 2023, the parties in favor of equal marriage reached an agreement with opponents that the law would be approved and unions equal in rights to marriage would be recognized, as long as those unions were not called 'marriage'. Conservative parties in return withdrew a proposal to ban equal marriage in the country's constitution. This law would therefore not provide for fully marriage equality, as the resulting unions would not be called "marriages".[116] In November 2023, the Chamber's Constitutional and Legal Affairs Committee failed to reach an agreement on whether to approve the same-sex marriage bill or a bill providing partnerships equal to marriage in all but name. A second reading in the Chamber of Deputies took place on 7 February 2024.[117][118] The marriage bill was approved at the second reading,[119][120] but on third reading on 28 February, the lower house of the Parliament amended the bill to provide more rights to civil unions, instead of legalizing same-sex marriage.[121] The resulting compromise bill now awaits reading in the
Senate.
Kosovo: On 10 June 2023, Prime Minister
Albin Kurti stated that the government is strongly committed to passing the new Civil Code, which would introduce same-sex civil unions in Kosovo.[122]
Lithuania: In May 2022, a group of MPs drafted a civil union bill which would provide limited protections for registered same-sex couples. The proposal is a compromise after a more expansive civil partnership bill was defeated in 2021.[123] On 26 May 2022 the bill passed its first reading in the Seimas with 70 votes in favour, 49 votes against and 6 abstentions.[124] It passed a second reading on 23 May 2023, by a vote of 60–52. It awaits a third reading.[125]
Ukraine: On 12 July 2022, a petition on same-sex marriage reached 28,000 signatures (above the 25,000 signatures needed to trigger a debate in parliament).[126] President
Volodymyr Zelenskyy stated on 2 August 2022 that while a change of the constitution, which defines marriage as union of a man and a woman, is not allowed as long as
martial law is in place, he endorses the introduction of civil unions and asked his government to evaluate legal options.[127] As of 26 May 2023[update], the Ukrainian Parliamentary Judicial Committee is considering Bill № 9103, which would introduce civil partnerships in Ukraine.[128]
Opposition proposals and legal rulings
Romania: In May 2023, the European Court of Human Rights ordered the government to legalize same-sex civil partnerships, in order to protect the rights of queer people to a family life, as protected under the Charter.[129] The government had three months to appeal.
After the approval of same-sex marriage in Portugal in January 2010, 52% of the Portuguese population stated that they were in favor of the legislation.[132] In 2008, 58% of the Norwegian voters supported same-sex marriage, which was introduced in the same year, and 31 percent were against it.[133] In January 2013, 54.1% of Italians respondents supported same-sex marriage.[134] In a late January 2013 survey, 77.2% of Italians respondents supported the recognition of same-sex unions.[135] According to an Ipsos poll published in 2021, 83% of Italians were in favour of legal recognition for same-sex couples, 10% stated they were against and 7% did not have a specific position on the issue.[136] 59% of surveyed Italians stated they were in favour of same-sex couples jointly adopting children, while 36% were opposed.[136]
In
Greece, support more than tripled between 2006 and 2017. In 2006, 15% of Greeks said that they agreed with same-sex marriage being allowed throughout Europe,[131] rising to 50.04% by 2017. A survey in 2020 indicated that 56% of the Greek population accept same-sex marriage.[137][138]
In Ireland, a 2008 survey revealed 84% of people supported civil unions for same-sex couples (and 58% for same-sex marriage),[139] while a 2010 survey showed 67% supported same-sex marriage[140] by 2012 this figure had risen to 73% in support.[141] On 22 May 2015, 62.1% of the electorate voted to enshrine same-sex marriage in the Irish constitution as equal to heterosexual marriage.
In
Croatia, a poll conducted in November 2013 revealed that 59% of Croats think that marriage should be constitutionally defined as a union between a man and a woman, while 31% do not agree with the idea.[142] In Poland, support for same sex marriages has increased from 17% in 2006[143] to 45% in 2019,[144] according to Eurobarometer; other polls show a majority supporting registered partnerships.[145][146]
In the European Union, support tends to be the lowest in
Bulgaria,
Latvia,
Hungary,
Romania,
Slovakia, and
Lithuania. The average percentage of support for same-sex marriage in the European Union as of 2006 when it had 25 members was 44%, which had descended from a previous percentage of 53%. The change was caused by more
socially conservative nations joining the EU.[131] In 2015, with 28 members, average support was at 61%.[130]
Opinion polls
Indicates the country/territory has legalised same-sex marriage nationwide
Indicates that same-sex marriage is legal in certain parts of the country
Indicates that the country has civil unions or registered partnerships
Indicates that the country has pending civil union or registered partnership legislation
^
abBecause some polls do not report 'neither', those that do are listed with simple yes/no percentages in parentheses, so their figures can be compared.
^
abComprises: Neutral; Don't know; No answer; Other; Refused.
^Unregistered cohabitation since 2001 and registered partnerships registrované partnerství since 2006. Limited rights for a "close person" (Osoba blízká) since 1964.
^Unregistered cohabitation élettársi kapcsolat and registered partnerships bejegyzett élettársi kapcsolat since 2009.
^Civil unions and cohabitation agreements since 2016.
^Legalised by judicial decision. Registration of same-sex unions is possible through court action.
^Limited residency rights for foreign spouses since 2012.
^Limited rights for a "close person" (blízke osoby) since 1964.
^While Armenia's Constitutional Court has never confirmed that the Constitution of Armenia actually bans same-sex marriage, following the 2015 constitutional referendum article 35 now states that "A woman and a man having attained the marriageable age shall have the right to marry and form a family with free expression of their will." (in Armenian: Ամուսնական տարիքի հասած կինը և տղամարդը միմյանց հետ իրենց կամքի ազատ արտահայտությամբ ամուսնանալու և ընտանիք կազմելու իրավունք ունեն). The article 143 of the Family Code recognizes foreign marriages as long as they conform with the legality of the territory where they were celebrated. Article 152, however, limits the application of foreign family law norms that contradict the internal public order, thus making the registration of same-sex marriages performed overseas possibly incompatible with Armenian law.
^"Mémorial A n° 125 de 2014"(PDF) (in French). Journal officiel du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg. 17 July 2014. Archived from
the original(PDF) on 16 September 2016. Retrieved 17 July 2014.
^"Constitution of the Republic of Serbia". Srbija.gov.rs. Retrieved 22 June 2015. Contracting, duration or dissolution of marriage shall be based on the equality of man and woman.