Part of the LGBT rights series
Legal status of same-sex unions
Marriage Andorra Argentina Australia Austria Belgium Brazil Canada Chile Colombia Costa Rica Cuba Denmark Ecuador Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Iceland Ireland Luxembourg Malta Mexico Netherlands1 New Zealand2 Norway Portugal Slovenia South Africa Spain Sweden Switzerland Taiwan United Kingdom3 United States4 Uruguay Recognized Israel5
Civil unions and registered partnerships Bolivia Croatia Cyprus Czech Republic Hungary Italy Israel5 Latvia* Liechtenstein Monaco Montenegro Netherlands:   •  Aruba San Marino United Kingdom:   •  Bermuda   •  Cayman Islands
Minimal recognition Bulgaria6 Cambodia:7   • 68 communes China:8   •  Hong Kong9 India10 Japan11   •  457 jurisdictions Lithuania6 Namibia12 Netherlands:1   •  Curaçao   •  St Maarten Poland6 Romania13 Slovakia6
Unclear legal status Nepal*
See also Same-sex union legislation Same-sex union court cases Timeline of same-sex marriage Recognition of same-sex unions in Africa Recognition of same-sex unions in Asia Recognition of same-sex unions in Europe Recognition of same-sex unions in the Americas Recognition of same-sex unions in Oceania Marriage privatization Divorce of same-sex couples Domestic partnership Military policy Adoption Listings by country LGBT rights by country or territory
Notes KoN: Performed in the Netherlands proper, including the Caribbean Netherlands. Registered in Aruba, Curaçao and Sint Maarten in such cases, but the rights of marriage are not guaranteed. NZ: Neither performed nor recognized in Niue, Tokelau, or the Cook Islands. UK: Neither performed nor recognized in six British Overseas Territories. US: Neither performed nor recognized in some tribal nations. Recognized but not performed in several other tribal nations and American Samoa. Israel: Registered foreign marriages confer all marriage rights. Domestic common-law marriages confer most rights of marriage. Domestic civil marriage recognized by some cities. EU: The Coman v. Romania ruling of the European Court of Justice obliges the state to provide residency rights for the foreign spouses of EU citizens. All EU member states except Romania follow the ruling. Cambodia: Recognition of a "declaration of family relationship", which may be useful in matters such as housing, but they are not legally binding. China: Guardianship agreements, conferring some limited legal benefits, including decisions about medical and personal care. HK: Inheritance, guardianship rights, and residency rights for foreign spouses of legal residents. India: Courts have recognised guru–shishya, nata pratha or maitri karar–type contractual relationships, but they are not legally binding. Japan: Some cities and prefectures issue partnership certificates, but they are not legally binding. Namibia: Marriages conducted abroad between a Namibian national and a foreign spouse recognized for residency rights. Romania: Hospital visitation rights through a "legal representative" status. * Not yet in effect
LGBT portal
v t e

Bulgaria does not recognize same-sex marriage or civil unions. Though these issues have been discussed frequently over the past few years, no law on the matter has passed the National Assembly. In September 2023, the European Court of Human Rights ordered the government to establish a legal framework recognizing same-sex unions.

The Constitution of Bulgaria defines marriage as "a union between a man and a woman", effectively prohibiting the legalization of same-sex marriage. ^[1] Only civil marriages are recognised by law in Bulgaria. ^[2]

Registered partnerships

In 2008 and 2009, there were many debates on several national TV stations on the subject of registered partnerships, with the participation of politicians, religious leaders, gay activists and others. ^{[3] [4]} The government had suggested that the National Assembly vote in favor of the new Family Code, which was supposed to include registered partnerships ( Bulgarian: регистрирано партньорство, ^[5] registrírano partnjórstvo, pronounced [rɛɡiˈstrirɐno ˈpartnjorstvo]) ^[a] providing some of the rights and benefits of marriage. ^[2] These partnerships would not have been open to same-sex couples; however, on July 16, 2008, the Commission for Protection against Discrimination in Bulgaria suggested that the right to registered partnerships be extended to same-sex couples as well. ^[6] The Catholic Church subsequently announced its opposition to recognising registered partnerships, stating that legally recognising partnerships for both different-sex and same-sex couples would "weaken" and "jeopardise" the institution of marriage. Some opponents further stated that the Family Code would legalise incest and polygamy, despite the draft code explicitly prohibiting both. ^[2] On June 12, 2009, the new Family Code was passed without provisions recognizing registered partnerships for either same-sex or opposite-sex couples.

The issue of whether the Family Code should recognise registered partnerships and provide cohabiting couples with several rights available to married couples, including the right to adopt and provide consent for medical treatment, resurfaced in 2012. Opponents claimed that legalising registered partnerships would "weaken" the institution of marriage and "confuse" children, while supporters argued that it would protect couples who choose not to marry as well as their children. According to the National Statistical Institute, about 59% of Bulgarian children were born to unmarried parents in 2012.

Koilova and Babulkova and aftermath

On 5 September 2023, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) ruled in Koilova and Babulkova v. Bulgaria that the government had unfairly discriminated against a same-sex couple, Darina Koilova and Lilia Babulkova, Bulgarian nationals who had legally married in the United Kingdom in November 2016, for refusing to recognise their marriage. The couple had filed a lawsuit in Lyulin, Sofia in 2017 to have their marriage recognised in Bulgaria. ^[7] The Sofia Administrative Court rejected their case in January 2018. ^[8] However, a group of lawyers representing the couple appealed that decision. ^[9] The Supreme Administrative Court of Bulgaria upheld the lower court's decision in December 2019. The couple issued the following statement after the court ruling, "The law's job is to regulate realities in a society. Our family is such a reality, and I regret that the Supreme Court in our country did not have the courage to admit this fact. Not recognizing our marriage does not have the power to break the bond between us. But it has the power to make our lives much more difficult. It is a pity when your own country creates difficulties and makes you feel small and insignificant, and I am sure that in this respect, many people know how we feel. Now, however, holidays are coming and we just want to wish everyone to enjoy them with their loved ones, with warmth and affection, as we will do." ^[10]

The case was appealed to the ECHR in 2020, which held oral arguments on 4 July 2023. The court issued its decision on 5 September, overturning the previous court rulings and concluding that the government had violated Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which protects the right to private and family life. ^[11] The court ordered the government to establish a legal framework recognising same-sex unions. ^{[12] [13] [14]} However, the court also emphasised existing case law in Schalk and Kopf v. Austria that there is no positive obligation under the Convention to recognise same-sex marriage. ^[15] Human Rights Watch issued a statement following the decision, urging the government to "swiftly implement the court's judgment". ^[16] The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights had already ruled in January 2023 in Fedotova and Others v. Russia that Article 8 places a positive obligation on all member states of the Council of Europe to recognize same-sex partnerships. ^[17]

Same-sex marriage

Background

The Constitution of Bulgaria explicitly prohibits the recognition of same-sex marriage. Article 46 states: "Matrimony shall be a free union between a man and a woman. Only a civil marriage shall be legal." ^[18] The only way to legalise same-sex marriage in Bulgaria is to amend the Constitution, which requires a two-thirds majority in the National Assenbly on three occasions. ^[19]

2018 European Court of Justice ruling

On June 5, 2018, the European Court of Justice ruled that European Union (EU) member states must recognise the freedom of movement and residency rights of same-sex spouses, provided one partner is an EU citizen. ^{[20] [21] [22]} The court ruled that EU member states may choose whether or not to allow same-sex marriage, but they cannot obstruct the freedom of residence of an EU citizen and their spouse. In addition, the court ruled that the term "spouse" is gender-neutral and does not necessarily imply a person of the opposite sex. ^{[23] [24]}

Citing the ruling, a Sofia court granted a same-sex couple a right of residency in Bulgaria on 29 June 2018. The couple, an Australian woman and her French spouse who had married in France in 2016, were denied residency in Bulgaria in 2017 when they attempted to renew their residency status, which had previously been granted under an EU mobility directive. ^[25] In January 2019, Bulgarian immigration officials appealed the decision. ^[26] On 25 July 2019, the Supreme Administrative Court upheld the lower court's ruling. ^{[27] [28]} The couple's lawyer, Denitsa Lyubenova, said the move could be "an important first step toward the legalization of same-sex marriage in Bulgaria". ^[29]

Public opinion

The 2015 Eurobarometer found that 17% of Bulgarians supported same-sex marriage. This was the lowest support in the European Union, and only a 2% change from the 2006 Eurobarometer, when 15% of Bulgarians expressed support for same-sex marriage. ^[30] The 2019 Eurobarometer found that 16% of Bulgarians thought same-sex marriage should be allowed throughout Europe, while 74% were against. ^[31]

A GLOBSEC survey conducted in March 2023 showed that 21% of Bulgarians supported same-sex marriage, while 69% were opposed. ^[32] The 2023 Eurobarometer found that 17% of respondents thought same-sex marriage should be allowed throughout Europe, while 75% were opposed. The survey also found that 21% of Bulgarians thought that "there is nothing wrong in a sexual relationship between two persons of the same sex", while 72% disagreed. This was the lowest level of support for same-sex marriage in the European Union. ^[33]

See also

• LGBT rights in Bulgaria
• Common-law marriage
• Recognition of same-sex unions in Europe

Notes

References