Maya Forstater (born 3 July[1] 1973) is a British
business studies and
international development researcher who was the claimant in Forstater v Centre for Global Development Europe.[2][3][4][5] The case established that
gender critical views are protected as a belief under the
Equality Act 2010,[6][7] while stating that the judgment does not permit misgendering transgender people with impunity.[8] At a subsequent full merits hearing, the Employment Tribunal upheld Forstater's case, concluding that she had suffered direct discrimination on the basis of her gender critical beliefs.[9] The judgement for remedies was handed down in June 2023, with Forstater awarded compensation of £91,500 for loss of earnings, injury to feelings and aggravated damages, with an additional £14,900 added as interest.[10][11]
Career
Forstater holds a degree from
Newcastle University. In 2002, she co-authored a technical report for the
United Nations Industrial Development Organization on
corporate social responsibility for
small and medium enterprises.[12] She has published academic research on corporate responsibility and illicit financial flows.[13][12] Her collaborators include
Simon Zadek[14] and Peter Raynard.[12] She has been senior researcher for the
United Nations Environment Programme Inquiry into The Design of a Sustainable Financial Systems and in 2015 she became a consultant at the
Center for Global Development (CGD), a think-tank that campaigns against poverty. She described her work as being "in a field of technocratic activism: think tank research, where people are expected to be mission driven and to share their personal, evidence based, opinion in order to influence public policy debates towards socially beneficial goals".[15]
In 2019, Forstater's consulting contract for CGD was not renewed after – during online discourse regarding potential reforms to the
Gender Recognition Act – she published a series of social media messages describing
transgender women as still being men, which led to concerns being raised by staff at CGD. Forstater challenged the non-renewal of her contract at the Central London
Employment Tribunal. In December 2019, a hearing was held to establish whether Forstater's beliefs qualified as a protected belief under the
Equality Act 2010. Judge Tayler ruled that they did not, stating that her
gender critical views were "incompatible with human dignity and fundamental rights of others".[16][17][18]
Forstater appealed against the judgment, and this was heard by the
Employment Appeal Tribunal in April 2021. Judgment was
reserved, with the decision in her favour published on 10 June 2021. As with the original hearing, the appeal was on the narrow issue of whether her beliefs were protected under the Equality Act, therefore amounting to a protected belief. The judgment found that Forstater's gender critical beliefs were protected, meeting the final requirement in Grainger plc v Nicholson, specifically that they were "worthy of respect in a democratic society". However, in its judgment, the Tribunal clarified that this finding does not mean that people with gender critical beliefs can express them in a way that discriminates against trans people.[19][20] A full merits hearing on Forstater's claim that she lost her employment as a result of these beliefs was heard in March 2022, with the decision delivered in July 2022.[21][22] The decision of the Employment Tribunal upheld Forstater's case, concluding that she had suffered direct discrimination on the basis of her gender-critical beliefs.[9][23] The judgment for remedies was handed down in June 2023, with Forstater awarded compensation of £91,500 for loss of earnings, injury to feelings and aggravated damages, with an additional £14,900 added as interest.[10][24]
Campaigning
In March 2019, Forstater criticised the
Minister for Women and Equalities,
Penny Mordaunt, for her
Mumsnet webchat on
International Women's Day. Mordaunt received many questions regarding women and transgender people that she did not answer.[25] Forstater wrote in The Independent that Mordaunt had asked for "discussions on the topic of sex and gender identity to take place in a 'climate of respect, empathy and understanding', but when faced with a group of mothers asking respectful and carefully researched questions, she ducked and ran".[26]
In late-May 2021, Forstater commented under an article published in The BMJ that she believed gender identity should not be used in the collection of sex data for medical matters.[30] The authors of the article responded that she had "misrepresented" their point, as they were not advocating that gender identity be used as a proxy for sex, but rather that "relevant and accurate information about a person’s body and health needs cannot reliably be assumed with sex assigned at birth data." In their response, the article's authors emphasised that "many cisgender and transgender people have the ability to become pregnant".[31]
In an article published in March 2021 in the Journal of Philosophy of Education, Judith Suissa and Alice Sullivan cited Forstater's case as an example of women who "face campaigns of harassment, including attempts to get them fired" for discussing the rights of women and girls and the potential conflicts this may have with campaigns for transgender rights.[32] Forstater's experiences are referred to in
Kathleen Stock's book Material Girls: Why Reality Matters for Feminism in the context of how the charity
Stonewall might influence court rulings.[33]
In 2021,
Baroness Falkner of Margravine, the new EHRC chair, mentioned Forstater in her first interview after taking office, citing her as someone who had faced abuse for her views and stating that "a lot of people would find [it] an entirely reasonable belief" that "people who self identify as a different sex are not the different sex that they self identify."[35][36][37] Forstater was an invited speaker to a University of Cambridge student event on the topic of
freedom of speech and belief.[38]
In December 2021, Forstater received an apology from
The Scout Association after a complaint was made against her, and published the text of the apology on her website.[39] Forstater had described the complaint as "
vexatious".[40]
^Kahler, Miles; Forstater, Maya; Findley, Michael G.; Vittori, Jodi; Westenberg, Erica; Fanusie, Yaya J. (1 October 2018).
"About the Authors". Global Governance to Combat Illicit Financial Flows: Measurement, Evaluation, Innovation (Report).
Council on Foreign Relations. pp. 66–68.
Archived from the original on 30 September 2021. Retrieved 30 April 2021.
^"Maya Forstater". Tax Journal.
Archived from the original on 30 April 2021. Retrieved 30 April 2021.
^Pedersen, Sarah (2020). The Politicization of Mumsnet. Bingley: Emerald Publishing.
ISBN978-1-83909-471-2.
OCLC1245205439. Given her role as Minister for Women and Equalities, it is perhaps not surprising to note that the majority of questions posed for Mordaunt were on the topics of GRA reform, the prescription of 'puberty blocking' drugs to children, how schools should safeguard both female and trans students, trans people in sport and in prisons, and the basic question of the definition of 'woman'.