Case name
|
Citation
|
Summary
|
Bailey v. Alabama
|
211
U.S.
452 (1911)
|
peonage laws and the
Thirteenth Amendment
|
Weems v. United States
|
217
U.S.
349 (1910)
|
cruel and unusual punishment
|
Bailey v. Alabama
|
219
U.S.
219 (1911)
|
Advisory opinion overturned peonage laws
|
Muskrat v. United States
|
219
U.S.
346 (1911)
|
Advisory opinion doctrine
|
Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.
|
220
U.S.
107 (1911)
|
constitutionality of
corporate income tax
|
United States v. Grimaud
|
220
U.S.
506 (1911)
|
control of forest reserves
|
Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. United States
|
221
U.S.
1 (1910)
|
dissolving interstate monopolies
|
Dowdell v. United States
|
221
U.S.
325 (1911)
|
sometimes considered one of the
Insular Cases
|
Gompers v. Buck's Stove and Range Co.
|
221
U.S.
418 (1911)
|
contempt for violating an injunction against a worker's boycott
|
Hoke v. United States
|
227
U.S.
308 (1913)
|
upheld the
Mann Act, but held that
Congress could not regulate
prostitution
|
Bauer & Cie. v. O'Donnell
|
229
U.S.
1 (1913)
|
extensions of patents by use of licenses, rights of copyright holder regarding “use” of copyrighted works
|
Charlton v. Kelly
|
229
U.S.
447 (1913)
|
procedures to approve extradition of criminal suspect to another country
|
Stratton's Independence, Ltd. v. Howbert
|
231
U.S.
399 (1913)
|
|
Weeks v. United States
|
232
U.S.
383 (1914)
|
establishment of the
exclusionary rule for illegally obtained evidence
|
Ocampo v. United States
|
234
U.S.
91 (1914)
|
sometimes considered one of the
Insular Cases
|
Shreveport Rate Case
|
234
U.S.
342 (1914)
|
Commerce clause, regulation of intrastate
railroad rates
|
Coppage v. Kansas
|
236
U.S.
1 (1915)
|
Economic due process and
yellow-dog contracts
|
Burdick v. United States
|
236
U.S.
79 (1915)
|
Legal effect of a
pardon
|
Mutual Film Corporation v. Industrial Commission of Ohio
|
236
U.S.
230 (1915)
|
free speech and the
censorship of
motion pictures
|
Guinn v. United States
|
238
U.S.
347 (1915)
|
constitutionality of Oklahoma's "grandfather law" used to disenfranchise African-American voters
|
Hadacheck v. Sebastian
|
239
U.S.
394 (1915)
|
municipal regulation of land use
|
Bi-Metallic Investment Co. v. State Board of Equalization
|
239
U.S.
441 (1915)
|
denial of due process procedural protections for legislative and rulemaking acts, as opposed to adjudicatory proceedings
|
Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad
|
240
U.S.
1 (1916)
|
power to tax income under the
Sixteenth Amendment
|
Stanton v. Baltic Mining Co.
|
240
U.S.
103 (1916)
|
power to tax income under the
Sixteenth Amendment
|
Georgia, Florida, & Alabama Railway Co. v. Blish Milling Co.
|
241
U.S.
190 (1916)
|
responsibilities of parties under a
bill of lading
|
United States v. Forty Barrels and Twenty Kegs of Coca-Cola
|
241
U.S.
265 (1916)
|
case brought against
Coca-Cola under the
Pure Food and Drug Act
|
United States v. Oppenheimer
|
242
U.S.
85 (1916)
|
doctrine of
res judicata applies to criminal cases
|
American Well Works Co. v. Layne & Bowler Co.
|
241
U.S.
257 (1916)
|
scope of
federal question jurisdiction in
patent law case
|
Caminetti v. United States
|
242
U.S.
470 (1917)
|
Mann Act applies to consensual extramarital sex
|
Bunting v. Oregon
|
243
U.S.
426 (1917)
|
Labor law, ten-hour workday
|
Adams v. Tanner
|
244
U.S.
590 (1917)
|
Substantive due process, state's prohibition of
employment agencies was unconstitutional under the
Fourteenth Amendment
|
Buchanan v. Warley
|
245
U.S.
60 (1917)
|
constitutionality of local ordinance compelling racial segregation of residential housing
|
Chicago Board of Trade v. United States
|
246
U.S.
231 (1918)
|
Rules of a
commodities exchange examined under
rule of reason
|
Hammer v. Dagenhart
|
247
U.S.
251 (1918)
|
Congressional power to regulate child labor under the Commerce Clause
|
International News Service v. Associated Press
|
248
U.S.
215 (1918)
|
property rights in news;
misappropriation doctrine
|
Schenck v. United States
|
249
U.S.
47 (1919)
|
freedom of speech, “
clear and present danger”, “
shouting fire in a crowded theater”
|
Debs v. United States
|
249
U.S.
211 (1919)
|
sedition
|
Abrams v. United States
|
250
U.S.
616 (1919)
|
validity of criminalizing criticism of the government
|
Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States
|
251
U.S.
385 (1920)
|
Fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine in a
tax evasion case
|
Eisner v. Macomber
|
252
U.S.
189 (1920)
|
pro rata
stock dividend not taxable income
|
Missouri v. Holland
|
252
U.S.
416 (1920)
|
states’ rights
|
United States v. Wheeler
|
254
U.S.
281 (1920)
|
Privileges and Immunities Clause and
kidnapping
|
Smith v. Kansas City Title & Trust Co.
|
255
U.S.
180 (1921)
|
federal question jurisdiction in state
corporate law matter
|
Newberry v. United States
|
256
U.S.
232 (1921)
|
Congress lacks the power to regulate
primary elections
|
Dillon v. Gloss
|
256
U.S.
368 (1921)
|
Constitutional amendment process
|