Global apartheid is a term used to describe how
Global North countries are engaged in a project of "racialization, segregation, political intervention, mobility controls, capitalist plunder, and labor exploitation" affecting people from the
Global South. Proponents of the concept argue that a close examination of the global system reveals it to be a kind of apartheid writ large with striking resemblance to
the system of racial segregation in
South Africa from 1948 to 1994, but based on borders and national sovereignty.[1]
The first use of the term may have been by Gernot Koehler in a 1978 Working Paper[21] for the
World Order Models Project. In 1995, Koehler developed this in The Three Meanings of Global Apartheid: Empirical, Normative, Existential.[22]
Its best known use was by
Thabo Mbeki, then-President of South Africa, in a 2002
speech, drawing comparisons of the status of the world's people, economy, and access to natural resources to the apartheid era.[23] Mbeki got the term from Titus Alexander, initiator of
Charter 99, a campaign for
global democracy, who was also present at the UN
Millennium Summit and gave him a copy of Unravelling Global Apartheid.
Concept
Minority rule in global governance is based on national sovereignty rather than racial identity, but in many other respects the history and structures of apartheid South Africa can be seen as a microcosm of the world. Following the Great Depression in the 1930s and the Second World War, the United States and United Kingdom used their political power to create systems of economic management and protection to mitigate the worst effects of free trade and neutralise the competing appeals of communism and national socialism [citation needed]. In South Africa civilized labour policies restricted public employment to whites, reserved skilled jobs for whites and controlled the movement of non-whites through a system of pass laws. In the West, escalating tariff barriers [citation needed] reserved manufacturing work for Europeans and Americans while immigration laws controlled the movement of immigrants seeking work.
Alexander argued that apartheid was a system of one-sided protectionism, in which the rich white minority used their political power to exclude the black majority from competing on equal terms, and warned that "the intensification of economic competition as a result of greater free trade is increasing political pressures for one-sided protectionism."[24]
At a political level, the West still dominates global decision-making through minority control of the central banking system (
Bank of International Settlements),
IMF,
World Bank,
Security Council and other institutions of global governance. The
G8 (now G7) represent less than 15% of world population, yet have over 60% of its income. 80% of the permanent members of the UN Security Council represent white Western states, 60% from Europe. The West has veto power in the World Bank, IMF and
WTO and regulates global monetary policy through the Bank of International Settlements (BIS). By tradition, the head of the World Bank is always a US citizen, nominated by the US president, and the IMF is a European. Although the rest of the world now has a majority in many international institutions, it does not have the political power to reject decisions by the Western minority.[citation needed]
Alexander claims there are numerous pillars of global apartheid including:[2]
immigration controls which manage the flow of labour to meet the needs of Western economies
use of aid and investment to control elites in the Majority World through reward and punishment
support for coups or military intervention in countries which defy Western dominance
More recently, scholars such as Thanh-Dam Truong and
Des Gasper, inTransnational Migration and Human Security[25] and Kyle and Koslowsk in In Global Human Smuggling, analyse the rise of migrant smuggling and human trafficking in terms of the "
structural violence generated by the escalation of border interdiction by states as part of the system of global apartheid."[26] Political demands for
protectionism and physical barriers between the West and the Majority World, such as President
Trump's wall between Mexico and the US as well as barriers round the EU [27][28] follow similar economic pressures to those which entrenched apartheid in South Africa.
Law scholar
Dimitry Kochenov argues that
citizenship and
nationality law is a form of apartheid that creates unequal protection that would never be accepted within the borders of any liberal democracy. "Like slavery, like sexism, like racism, citizenship knows no justification once you leave the purview of those few whom it unduly privileges."[29]
^
abTitus Alexander, Unravelling Global Apartheid: An Overview of World Politics, Polity Press, 1996
^Bruno Amoroso, Global Apartheid. Economics and Society, Federico Caffè Center, Roskilde, Città di Castello, 2004
^Patrick Bond, Against Global Apartheid: South Africa Meets the World Bank, IMF and International Finance, Zed Books Ltd; 2nd edition February 2004
^Gernot Kohler, Global Apartheid, Working Paper No 7, World Order Models Project, New York, 1978
^Arjun Makhijiani, From Global Capitalism to Economic Justice, Apex Press, 1992
^Ali Mazuri in conversation with Fouad Kalouche, Universalism, Global Apartheid, and Justice
^Adekeye Adebajo, James Jonah, Ali A. Mazrui and Tor Sellstrom, From Global Apartheid to Global Village: Africa and the United Nations, University of KwaZulu-Natal Press, Aug 2009; Leith Mullings, New Social Movements in the African Diaspora: Challenging Global Apartheid (Critical Black Studies) February 2010
^Vandana Shiva, 'The New Environmental Order' Third World Resurgence, 20 April 1992, Third World Network, Penang, Malaysia, p 2 -3
^Anthony H Richmond, Global Apartheid: Refugees, Racism and the New World Order, Oxford University Press, Ontario, 1995
^Joseph Nevins, Dying to Live: A Story of U.S. Immigration in an Age of Global Apartheid (Open Media), City Lights Books, October 2008
^Muhammed A. Asadi, Global Apartheid, iUniverse, February 2003
^Per Gustav Edvard Fridolin, Från Vittsjö till världen - om global apartheid och alla vi som vill någon annanstans (From Vittsjö to the world - about global apartheid and everyone of us that want to go somewhere), 2006
^Amoroso, Bruno (2003). Global apartheid: globalisation, economic marginalisation, political destabilisation. Roskilde University, Dept. of Social Sciences.
ISBN87-7349-590-5.
OCLC71725346.
^Peterson, V. Spike (2004-03-01). "A Critical Rewriting of Global Political Economy: Integrating Reproductive, Productive and Virtual Economies". Routledge: 10.
doi:
10.4324/9780203380826.
ISBN9780203380826. {{
cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (
help)
^Jones, Adam (2012). Crimes Against Humanity: A Beginner's Guide. Oneworld Publications. pp. Chapter 9.
ISBN9781780741468.
^Kyle, David; Koslowski, Rey (2011). Global human smuggling : comparative perspectives. Johns Hopkins University Press.
ISBN978-1-4214-0198-0.
OCLC810545259.
^Marable, Manning; Mullings, Leith (2016). New social movements in the African diaspora: challenging global apartheid. Springer.
ISBN9780230104570.
OCLC326570155.
^Boesak, Allan Aubrey (2016). Kairos, crisis, and global apartheid: the challenge to prophetic resistance. Springer.
ISBN9781137495310.
OCLC960423741.
^Kyle, David; Koslowski, Rey (2011). Global human smuggling: comparative perspectives. Johns Hopkins University Press. pp. 172–179.
ISBN978-1-4214-0198-0.
OCLC810545259.